View Full Version : The G1 Renaissance or how long it will stay 1984 for? 😜
Gofigure
1st June 2016, 02:44 PM
Right off the bat I can't tell you how happy I am with current focus on the G1 period across the line. It seems that the first incarnation of our favourite bots are heavily influencing and featured in the toys, comics, and games within the TF universe for the last few years. I am thrilled and it's such a great time to be a 'Transfan'. The IDW series are incredible reads, the masterpiece line is a child of the 80s wet dream, the main hasbro line is kicking along very nicely too with its focus on 80s combiners and now Titans of old. And let's not start on third party. The sheer volume of geewun releases there is staggering and unrelenting. It's hard not to break the bank
So suffice to say I'm quite satisfied. However I'm turning 40 soon.
So my question is how long have we got? We as in the 80s fans, the old brigade?
I don't want to tempt fate here however it feels like we have it way too good hehe
When does beast wars or armada have its time to shine and captured all the 90s Childs imagination all over again?
Can we just ask hasbro to stay in the 80s? It's awfully comfortable there! 😀
5FDP
1st June 2016, 03:10 PM
In my head, it's always 1984 :p
Zommael
1st June 2016, 03:11 PM
Speaking as someone who isn't that big a fan of G1, but nonetheless is almost exclusively a Generations collector these days, I have to say it's difficult.
Generation 1, specifically the first two seasons of the cartoon, will always be cemented as the iconic Transformers story in the minds of a vast number of fans. On the other hand, in my opinion there is much more fertile ground to explore in the other parts of the franchise, particularly the later and Japanese exclusive seasons and the comics.
Some fans have shown a clear distaste for when Hasbro try new things with old characters, such as making Optimus, Sky Lynx, or Cyclonus combiners. Terms like "retcon" and "not canon" get thrown around a lot. My question regarding that is what exactly constitutes canon for a work of fiction that's still ongoing in the form of the IDW comics? What is so wrong with changing things up and trying new things?
On the other hand, I feel a lot of frustration when I see HasTak focusing on, essentially, the same old ****. I was massively disappointed when Bruticus was announced as the first wave 2016 combiner since all it does is complete the trifecta of Superion, Devastator, and Bruticus who have been hanging around like a bad smell since Energon, as if those three are the only combiners. I've lost almost all interest in the Masterpiece line for the same reason: I just don't need "definitive" versions of a whole bunch of 80's cars.
As far as the IDW comics are concerned, they draw so widely from Transformers fiction that I don't really regard them as "G1" anymore so much as they're just "the Transformers". Outside of my own headcanon or fanfiction, they're the definitive story of the Transformers.
I don't know if we'll ever get a time when Armada or Beast Wars has the majority of the focus from HasTak for the simple reason that they seem to have figured out that remaking and redesigning old favourites is more profitable. They can do that for other franchises as well such as with the Universe Hot Shot, Generations Armada Starscream, and multiple Generations Beast Wars toys. They do seem to have progressed from a line dominated by 1984 to one that's now sitting comfortably across seasons three and four of the cartoon. Where they go from there is anybody's guess but I wouldn't be surprised to see them delve into more obscure concepts and characters.
G1 isn't and shouldn't be the be-all and end-all of the franchise, but it's hard to say it doesn't dominate - and it's hard to argue that that's not okay when there are still awesome toys like CW Sky Lynx coming out of that. I'm okay with that, even if I do see my interest waning long-term.
prjkt
1st June 2016, 03:38 PM
Character wise I think G1 has the widest gamut of bot's to pick from, we've still got most of the -master characters, micromasters and pretenders to go before we've "completed" the NeoG1 lineup with Classics-verse releases.
Having said that, as stated above we have been getting some Armada and Beast Wars love from HasTak over the last couple of years in the Generations/Legends lines, even Animated characters crossing over like LG Slipstream and I don't see that ending any time soon
GoktimusPrime
1st June 2016, 07:09 PM
I quite like seeing G1 characters getting Classicsverse or MP "upgrades" because I feel that they are in greater need. We know that late G2 and BW was the major turning point for Transformers toy engineering, transitioning from just being transformable toys to becoming articulated action figures. A lot of the features that we see in Transformers toys today sprang from that period. I have Generations Waspinator, Rhinox and "Fat" Tankor, and as nice as these toys really are, I also find that - in relative terms (e.g. price, size etc.), they are effectively on par with their original namesakes. None of them are really superior in relative terms. But when I take a Classicsverse or MP toy and compare it with its G1 counterpart, then the new toy blows the G1 toy right out of the water. There is no comparison, even in relative terms! :eek:
With post Beast Wars toys, I think it depends. As I said, Generations Tankor didn't feel like much of an upgrade to me, but toys like Universe Hot Shot and Combiner Wars Armada Megatron do feel like significant improvements over their original counterparts. Basically, toys like Armada Hot Shot and Megatron were pretty disappointing toys when they came out. Hot Shot soon became the butt of fan jokes, giving birth to the fan expression, "wHy My sH0uLd3rS hURt?" - a reference to so many Armada toys whose were designed to complement gimmicks (thus sacrificing action figure integrity), as opposed to gimmicks that are designed to complement toys (which we see in better toys like Tidal Wave and the Mini-Cons etc.). So when it comes down to post-BW figures, I think it depends. I don't think all of them need upgrades, but some really do (e.g. Armada Scavenger).
Having said that, I wouldn't personally go and buy upgrades of these characters, simply because I was already an adult when they came out. They hold no childhood nostalgia for me. But I think it's still cool that they do it and allow younger fans to enjoy upgraded figures from their childhoods. I bought my Combiner Wars G1 Megatron at the same time that young Handsprime bought his Combiner Wars Armada Megatron. Handsprime grew up with Armadaverse, so Armada Megatron is the Megatron from his childhood just as G1 Megatron is the Megatron from mine. We were sitting next to each other and opening our Megatrons at the same time (and comparing them with each other). :) While Armada Megatron doesn't hold that special meaning for me, I was happy to see Handsprime delight in opening this toy just as I delighted in opening my G1 CW Megatron.
So yeah, I'm all in favour of seeing HasTak release more upgrades of Transformers from newer post-G1 series. I may not necessarily be personally interested in all of them, but I'm not opposed to them either. And I think the clever thing for Hasbro to do is to try an redeco this moulds to appeal to multiple generations of fans, as they did with G1/Armada Megatron as well as others like Generations Armada Starscream/Jhiaxus (never got 'Screamer, but happily got Jhiaxus). And I'd be willing to support these toys by getting G1 redecos if they make them. :)
I did mention on the Combiner Wars Speculation thread (http://otca.com.au/boards/showthread.php?t=20222) that Titans Return Fortress Maximus could be redecoed as Grand Maximus and Brave Maximus. A Generations Brave Maximus would be really neat for people who grew up with Car Robot/RiD2001 in their childhood, especially considering that Hasbro never released the original Brave Maximus (because the G1 Fort Max mould fails the contemporary US drop test for kids' toys).
There's no reason why HasTak can't continue to appeal to multiple generations of fans by designing toys with the potential to be redecoed into different characters across generations. After all, isn't that why the line is called "Generations" in the first place? ;)
But as prjkt said, G1 is a massive line, and there's still a lot to go. TR is now giving us some characters from 1987 - namely Headmasters. But what about Targetmasters, Throttlebots, Clones, Punch/Counterpunch, Sixshot etc.? Then there's 1988-93 which has a whole host of characters to be done. :)
Bladestorm
1st June 2016, 07:30 PM
In my head, it's always 1984 :p
Here! Here!
There is something timeless about the G1 characters. As much as the vehicle modes might be dated they bring back fond memories for us kids of the 80's.
Now maybe my kids are weird but the also LOVE the G1 cartoons. My son will watch G1 Transformers all afternoon if you let him (in preference to shows like RID2015). Having access to those characters through things like Combiner Wars allows him to enjoy the characters just as kids back in our day did. So if other kids out there are getting the same opportunity to see the original G1 cartoons and enjoy the classic characters I can see the popularity of the originals continuing on into the future generations.
The G1 storylines were often cringeworthy but there was something addictive and enduring in the characters - well cast voices, a bit of humour, lots of camaraderie and hope with the reality that things don't alway go your way.
To be honest I don't think any other version of the franchise other than perhaps the Bayverse characters have made the same connection in such a broad way with their fans.
Beast Wars was great but I am not sure it has the momentum G1 had. G2 - I have a cousin who grew up with G2 and would longingly love to have a G2 Optimus like he had as a kid but he enjoyed watching G1 reruns so aside from the toy he doesn't connect with any other Transformers media from his era.
I suspect in 20 years time the Bay bots may have their renaissance period as the kids of the 2007 films reach their 40's. At that point it will be interesting to see if G1 can sustain itself or finally gets overshadowed by the CGI bots.
Jetfire in the sky
1st June 2016, 08:06 PM
I have the simple answer to the thread's question: As long as it is profitable for Has/Tak/Tom :p
prjkt
1st June 2016, 10:39 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the late G1 figures that the US didn't get (Turbomasters, Predators, Lightformers etc) get the Generations treatment (I'm surprised we didn't get those first two groups out of CW moulds, could have made Thunderclash's combined mode the unreleased "Hyperion" character.)
That would be my ideal "era" as those were the toys I had growing up - Thunderclash, Scorch, Falcon, Stalker, Skydive were all figures I had growing up, along with some of the G2 figures like Ransack and Leadfoot, as well as a couple of the Aquaspeeders I just can't remember. I remember having Deftwing too, he was one of my favourites for the longest time.
Would love to see new versions of all of these guys. Although my partner and wallet may not.
GoktimusPrime
1st June 2016, 10:53 PM
Bladestorm makes an interesting point. I think that there are several factors which have contributed to making G1 the most popular and endearing Transformers series in this franchise's 3-decade long history, and it includes:
Alpha and Omega
G1 came first. Okay, this does seem incredibly unfair to post-G1 series, but there it is. When something comes first then it sets the benchmark for the entire franchise and there's nothing to really compare it to (other than its competitors like GoBots, and Transformers smashed them out of the ball park). Subsequent series, they invariably end up being compared with G1, as G1 has essentially become the "metric" for Transformers. I know that this can often be unfair, but I also think that one cannot deny this reality. It just seems to be the nature of fans to compare things with original sources. Just look at the Deadpool movie; fans have loved this movie because it's far more faithful to the original source material than Deadpool's previous film appearance. But new and different ideas can be successful, but it has the additional hardship of overcoming comparisons with the original. Beast Wars is a good example of this. When this series first came out, it was met with a lot of skepticism from fans, with many crying foul with comments like "trukk not munky." But Beast Wars rose to the occasion and soon proved its worth on its own merit, but in terms of the quality of toys (which has set the standard for Transformers today) and story-telling in the cartoon (which has never been matched on screen; all TF stories that rival BW can only be found in comic books - BW still reigns supreme as the best Transformers screen story ever written... nothing else comes close).
But the whole "G1 as the baseline" thing is compounded when you consider that many subsequent series have based themselves off G1 rather than trying to do something more original.
+ G1 = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ RiD (2001) = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ Armadaverse = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ Movieverse = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ Animated = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ Prime = Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons
+ RiD2015 = Bumblebee and the Autobots vs the Decepticons
^One thing that I do admire about RiD2015 is how they're trying to break away from the same tired old formula of "Optimus Prime and the Autobots vs Megatron and the Decepticons!" I wish that they didn't bring Optimus Prime back, but I'm glad that they've made him subordinate to Bumblebee rather the usurping him. And I'm glad that they didn't just bring Megatron back (in Season 1 at least, I haven't finished watching S2 yet so please no spoilers, thanks). I quite like Steeljaw as the de facto leader of the Earthbound Decepticons; he kinda reminds me of IDW Soundwave, albeit more sinister. I was disappointed that Michael Bay just brought Megatron back (as Galvatron) in AoE... no imagination. If people want new Transformers series to leave the shadow of G1, then that series really needs to stop trying to emulate G1. This is another reason why Beast Wars was so awesome; they weren't trying to be like G1. :)
The Toys
The toys captured our imagination and fascination. While many G1 toys have become outdated by modern standards, they were mostly excellent toys for their time. The first year of Transformers become the highest grossing debut toyline, raking in US$1,400,000 in the US alone (which was a lot of money in 1984!). e.g. MP Soundwave's transformation is almost the same as G1 Soundwave's, but that just goes to show how well made G1 Soundwave was. MP Soundwave didn't deviate much from the original design because it didn't need to! You can't beat perfection. :) G1 Soundwave was a perfect toy by 1980s standards, and MP Soundwave is a perfect toy by 2010s standards. We know that the G2 toy line didn't fare as well because it failed to capture this same imagination. Early toys were just redecoed G1 toys, and while G2 did give us some really great toys like the Combat Heroes, Laser Rods etc., we did also get some really rubbish figures like the Power Masters etc. Beast Wars was the next line to recapture our imagination, as proven by impressive toy sales, and Car Robot/RiD2001 sold like wildfire with toys flying off shelves months before the show started. And we know that Car Robot went on to inspire Binaltech/Alternators and Masterpiece, so while that series has ended, its legacy lives on. But some of the post-CR/RiD series arguably failed to capture our imaginations at that same level. Armada and Energon saw a lot of gimmick dominated toys (Cybertron was a lot better though :)).
The Great Shift
Since 2007 we've seen Hasbro shift towards Transformers based on animation models instead of animation models being based on toys (as was the case with most pre-07 TFs). This was understandable for the live action movie toys, but Hasbro has since applied the same principle with other lines, namely Animated, Prime and the current Robots In Disguise series. The issue that I have with this is that animators and artists don't know how to design toys. They're not engineers. So it's been up to HasTak to "translate" animation models into transformable action figures, and quite frankly, it's a tough job. With most pre-2007 Transformers, HasTak's designers never had to worry about this, they could just focus on making the toys for the sake of being toys, not for the sake of emulating a screen model. There was far more creative freedom; let the animators 'translate' the toys as screen characters. This worked brilliantly in Beast Wars. When I look at all my Animated, Prime and RiD2015 toys, none of them strike me as being particularly excellent. Just good at best, but on the whole, I find these lines to be rather mediocre. There's nothing in these lines that I find on par with figures like G1 Soundwave, Ultra Optimus Primal, Mach Alert etc. where I just think, "That's a really clever toy!" It's not capturing my imagination and fascination at the same level as previous figures.
The Canon
One thing that made G1 stand out was the quality of story telling. Even with the G1 cartoon telling a story at a more superficial level (the Transformers were more caricatures than characters) and camp factor, the show didn't talk down to the audience. This is something which G1 voice actor Michael McConnohie (Tracks, Cosmos) has spoken about in interviews. Kids hate being treated as idiots. Many other toy franchise stories in the 80s had a condescending tone, but not Transformers. Transformers was more than happy to use mature language, which was littered throughout the tech specs, comics, cartoon etc. I learnt a lot of new words through my exposure to Transformers. G1 writers ensured that their characters spoke properly, demonstrating basic standards of language. This is incredibly important when it comes to children's literature too. I remember first watching Transformers on TV and my mum came into the lounge room and tried to convince me and my brother to "turn that rubbish off," but when she heard the characters speaking, she instantly noticed that they were well spoken. She then allowed us to watch Transformers, but told us to be mindful of the way that they spoke in order to pick up new vocabulary and grammar. This is what educators call the "hidden curriculum" in literature. The G1 cartoon occasionally hit on some really heavy themes too. McConnohie once used "The God Gambit" as an example; an episode where there's a planet whose gods resemble Cybertronians, and when the Cybertronians arrive they initially worship them as gods, and the Decepticons happily exploit this. This episode explores how religion can be corrupted as a means of controlling the masses and examines what people are willing to do in the name of religion. The Autobots on the other hand demonstrate religious tolerance - insisting that they're not gods and being appalled at seeing the Decepticons abuse the indigenous people's beliefs.
The G1 comic continuity, of course, was written at a significantly higher level than the cartoon, where the Transformers were actually treated as characters, and many stories were written in ongoing arcs rather than stand alone episodes (although they were plenty of those too). This is something IDW is doing now. And IDW has taken many cues from the Marvel Comics, such as the Wreckers, Decepticon Mayhem Attack Squad, ancient Cybertron being a corrupted republic (although this republic was far more sinister in IDW; in Marvel they were just incredibly arrogant and naive) etc.
Quirky Characters!
Here's something that is arguably lacking in more recent Transformers series -- individual quirks. This was something that G1 established through its toy continuity, much of which was picked up in other continuities, but just looking at the original toy canon, we can see that while many Transformers had awesome abilities, they also had bizarre quirks. This helped to flesh them out as being interesting characters, and not just, "butt kicking robots!" :rolleyes:
e.g.
* Bumblebee; while physically weak, his inconspicuous (i.e. not an attention-drawing sports/race car!) alt mode made him the ideal spy. There's a scene in Captain America Civil War where Cap, Bucky & Falcon are travelling in a VW Beetle to avoid drawing attention to themselves. But at the same time, Bumblebee is also desperate to prove his worth to his fellow Autobots.
* Soundwave; uses his incredible eavesdropping ability to blackmail his fellow Decepticons, who all hate him.
* Mirage and Thundercracker; moral ambiguity.
* Bluestreak; former refugee/asylum seeker whose cheerful exterior masks a tormented past.
* Trailbreaker; riddled with guilt as the most fuel consumptive Autobot.
* Breakdown; paranoid. WHO SAID THAT?!
* Dead End; emo.
* Motormaster; hate-mongering hate ball who is hated by his fellow Stunticons. This causes Menasor to be one big mentally messed up gestalt who finds it hard to think.
* Hook; The Decepticon equivalent of Hannibal Lecter.
* Groove; pacifist (IDW Megatron is currently more like Groove should be!)
* Blades; violent thug and all round adrenaline junkie. Surprisingly Blades and Groove are able to set their differences aside and work together professionally as components of Defensor, as his mind isn't fragmented like Menasor or Devastator's.
* Cosmos; lonely and desperate for companionship.
* Snarl; lonely and that's just the way he likes it. Hates the company of others.
* Shockwave; logic fiend.
...etc etc.
And we know that IDW comics have been feeding off the original source material from the G1 tech specs, Thundercracker being a notable example. IDW also saw the first canonical appearance of Hasbro's (not Takara's) Overlord, as well as the longest canonical appearance that Hubcap's ever had (although in other cases, completely deviating from it; e.g. Swerve, Tailgate etc.).
Not too many post-G1 toy lines have 'seeded' themselves with so much rich story potential via their toy continuity such as their tech specs. One of the brilliant things that Hasbro did with Transformers and G.I. Joe was to get Marvel comic writers to create characterisations for the toys. Larry Hama worked on GI Joe, and Bob Budiansky worked on a lot of the profiles for the Transformers. IMO few post-G1 TF lines have well written tech specs; those that do were Beast Machines and Transformers Cybertron.
Longevity
The original Transformers series (G1) ran for 8.5 consecutive years. When I think about why Beast Wars, despite its awesomeness, hasn't achieved the same level of fan endearment as G1, I think one contributing factor was its significantly shorter lifespan. Beast Wars only ran for 3 years (1996-99) before Hasbro cancelled it, and in the opinion of many fans (myself included), prematurely so. This is why the latter half of Beast Wars S3 feels so rushed, because it was. Writers had to wrap up all of these loose story ends because Hasbro was cancelling the line. But this gave it a relatively shorter span of time to sink into the fandom's psyche.
Subsequent series haven't fared much better. Beast Machines and Car Robot only lasted about a year each, and others have barely lasted beyond 3 years.
* Unicron Trilogy = 2003~06 (well, it started at the tail end of 2002, but most stores didn't get these toys until 03)
* Animated = 2008~09
* Prime = 2011~13
* Robots In Disguise = 2015~16
So Hasbro's now really into constantly rebooting the franchise on a fairly regular basis. The rationale being that it keeps the line fresh, but the downside is that it makes it difficult to build a strong fan base. Also, these lines are often used to fill the gaps between the live action movies, then a new movie comes out and the mainstream kids line gets rebooted. The live action movie franchise started 9 years ago, but bear in mind that these are not consecutive years; there are 2~3 year breaks between each film. Basically, there's not much in the way of long running continuity with post-G1 Transformers series.
Now, G1's longevity is even longer when you consider the G1 Renaissance, which may have started as early as 1996.
* 1996-99: Beast Wars & Beast Machines. As we know, the Beast Wars cartoon established itself as being in the same continuity family as G1, enhancing G1. Beast Wars also gave us a few characters that were explicitly stated as being the actual G1 characters themselves, such as Grimlock etc. Beast Machines continued from that and even started retroactively introducing new characters into G1, namely Obsidian and Strika.
* 1997: Machine Wars. All of them being new versions of G1 characters.
* 2002-08: exclusive G1 redecoed characters. Ichikawa Hirofumi's work on creating new characters for the eHobby and convention exclusive toys served to further expand G1, giving us characters like Road Rage, Tiger Track, Clampdown etc.
* Binaltech; again, more of Ichikawa's work to further expand G1, and also retroactively explaining things from G1 (e.g. Prowl II etc.).
* Masterpiece. New characters like Exhaust and Loud Pedal continue to expand the G1 universe.
* Classicsverse. While it's mostly upgrade of previous Transformers, Classicsverse has also given us a fair number of new characters too, including Drift, Windblade, Rook, Off Road, Victorion etc.
...in other words, G1 has continued to grow, it arguably has never stopped. One might argue that G1 never died off, but rather, evolved into becoming these "Renaissance" series. Much like dinosaurs evolving into birds.
BigTransformerTrev
3rd June 2016, 02:53 PM
So my question is how long have we got? We as in the 80s fans, the old brigade?
I don't want to tempt fate here however it feels like we have it way too good hehe
When does beast wars or armada have its time to shine and captured all the 90s Childs imagination all over again?
Can we just ask hasbro to stay in the 80s? It's awfully comfortable there! 😀
Okey doke, I read/skimmed most of the previous posts to if I repeat points that have already been made I apologize in advance :o But here are a few points I consider:
*The 80's fans - or the GeeWunner generation - is now of an age (and Im in the same boat as you Gofigue) where a lot of us are either:
-Single and have a disposable income to spend on toys that remind us of our youth or...
-Have kids who we want to share our passion with and want to be passionate about the same characters so buy them toys paying homage to them.
Therefore we are buying a lot of the Generations G1'esque toys. It's why I think there hasn't been a 'Generations' cartoon, because they dont need a TV show or movie to sell these characters, they have been firmly implanted in our minds for 30+ years. And chances are a lot of us will continue to buy these character toys, either for ourselves or our kids or both.
*Back then many of us only had 2 to 5 TV stations and of course no internet. There was not the competition for our attention from as many sources as there are now. Even in BW the internet was starting to take shape and you could get cable TV. Instead of being exposed to a few dozen different cartoons to try and flog you toys, in the recent TF incarnations there have been hundreds competing against them. It's much harder to grab a slice of the kids imagination and pockets. So while G1 was a revolutionary big fish in a little pond, BW onwards was just trying to swim as well as they could in a sea of competition.
*A lot of G1 characters have resurfaced in other TF cartoons and toylines. Starscream and Optimus in Armada, Omega Supreme and Scorponok in Energon, Metroplex and Soundwave in Cybertron, Ratchet and Blitzwing in Animated, Wheeljack and Shockwave in TFPrime, Bumblebee and Laserbeak in the movies etc etc. These characters have been repurposed again and again, they have stood the test of time. So they are known to multiple generations who are interested in them and likely to buy toys of them.
*A lot of G1 characters have cropped up in alternate media such as comic books and video games, once again, getting introduced to a new generation.
To be honest I don't see the revival of G1 centric toys ending, if anything it continues to expand. Many of us got excited when Heroes of Cybertron, Alternators and Titanium got released - suddenly characters we hadnt seen toys of for decades were back on the board! And they sold well. So since then we've had the immediately popular MP and CHUG lines appear as well as many mini lines such as Robot Heroes etc as well - these G1 homage toys make money!
As someone who finds it very hard to bypass a G1-homage toy it's a damn expensive time - but a golden age for Cybertronian collectors. And they day G1 homage toys begin to see a decline in sales across the board they will finally make a Generations' cartoon and a few DVD movies and kick it all off again :D
Lord_Zed
3rd June 2016, 05:20 PM
Parts of G1 will be around as long as Transformers exists as a brand. Like them or not the live action movies catapulted Bumblebees, Optimus and Megatron into the limelight once again and made them household names for the first time since the 80's. Hasbro will just keep reinventing the core characters over and over again as companies like Marvel do with their core heroes. I seriously doubt we will ever see a new Transformers story that doesn't involve Optimus or Bumblebee.
The core characters will endure though this G1 renaissance may start to fade in time when the buying power of the current g1 fans declines, new generations will no doubt still want more Optimus and co, but I imagine the ancillary characters (IE: pretty much everyone who hasn't been in 3 live action movies) will start to fade.
Already I think they are pushing the G1 thing maybe a little too far with some of those forced repaints, like the Combiner Wars Autobot cars. other than Scattershot and Armada Megatron they are the only Combiner Wars toys I've shelf warm.
Anyway while I'm happy that there are so many nostalgia miners at work with G1, it would be nice to see something new in Transformers again, Beast Wars was cool because it was a little bit different to what came before but still linked to it. It seems like we are trapped in various iterations of the same thing now.
GoktimusPrime
3rd June 2016, 08:02 PM
Armada Megatron is possibly one of the worst shelfwarmers we've seen in Classicsverse. Just today I walked into Target and saw a whole bunch of them gathering dust on the shelf.
The Armada kids are now in their late teens and early 20s, around the same age bracket that we G1 kids were when Beast Wars came out. That was the age when many of us "matured" as collectors, becoming more interactive with other fans and joining fine fan clubs like AusTrans^OzFormers. :) But it's also that age where people are still students, and thus lack the same level of disposable income that they'll have in a few years' time when they've entered the workforce.
The G1 Renaissance
The first big push of the G1 renaissance happened in the 00s, which is when most of us G1 kids had completed our education and were participating in the workforce. We suddenly had this thing called disposable incomes. And for those still living at home, unburdened by things like needing to pay rent, bills etc. HasTak (especially Takara) took advantage of this. This was the period when Takara started producing toys explicitly made for the collector market, labelled 対象年齢15歳以上 ("For Ages 15 and Up"). We got toys like:
* G1 reissues (now with fully powered launchers that would choke a child!)
* Smallest Transforming Transformers
* Binaltech/Alternators
* Masterpiece
* Alternity
* Various busts and statues, as well as PVC figurines
This was also when Transformers shifted away from beasts and towards vehicular alt modes. Hasbro were a bit slow to start, giving us Beast Machines in 2000 with mechanical looking bestial Maximals vs fantasy vehicle-moded Vehicons. It shelf warmed. :rolleyes: Takara on the other hand, gave us Beast Wars level engineering with licensed vehicle modes; Lamborghini, Dodge, Mercedes etc.; Hasbro released them a year later as Robots in Disguise. They sold like hot cakes. And of course, every Transformers series since then has primarily maintained that G1-esque theme. Sure, we get a few individual figures that are a nod to Beast Wars here and there, but not entire lines (except for BW reissues in 2006 for the 10th Anniversary; but those weren't new moulds). Armada finally gave us a Unicron toy, and Cybertron gave us Primus! :eek:
It was also the heightened enthusiasm in Transformers in the 00s which prompted Hasbro to green light production for a live action movie; announced in 2003 and first debuting in 2007. And of course, the movie in turn helped to massively boost interest in Transformers, but let's not forget that it was already the rapidly increasing interest in Transformers that prompted the creation of the movie franchise in the first place. 2000 was also the first time that "Generation One" entered official currency (before then it was an unofficial fan term for all pre-G2 Transformers). So our love for G1 actually pushed that term into official usage. :)
Why Haven't We Seen The Same Thing With Post-G1 TF fandoms?
Uh... this is a really good question, and I'm not entire sure where the answer may lie. The Children of Armada are probably still too young for Hasbro to thoroughly exploit; they would the around the same age that we G1 Kids were when Beast Wars came out. But the Children of Beast Wars would be around the same age that we G1 Kids were when the G1 Renaissance began. So where are all the BW reissues? Where are all the new BW figures and merchandise? :confused: Masterpiece is actually doing pretty well, with MP Beast Convoy coming out and also Cheetor being announced. That's actually better than how G1 MP started with just MP1 Convoy and MP2 Ultra Magnus (which was just a white MP1). :o So hopefully the BW MPs will mean more good things to come for the Children of Beast Wars. :) The Armada kids are probably still too young a demographic group for HasTak to commercially exploit, but give 'em a couple of years (i.e. once they begin entering the workforce and earning disposable incomes), then they should be.
But does the demand exist? I honestly don't know...
Gofigure
3rd June 2016, 10:13 PM
BigTransformerTrev you highlight a very big reason for the continuation that I missed. Legacy.
G1 continues in my household because of Dad. I reintroduced the cartoon via DVD and it was a big hit. The chug stuff I picked up because of my kids and their demand (with my approval of course hehe) They saw the characters and wanted specific figures.
Heck, just a few hours ago I told a transformers bedtime story to my 7 and 4 year olds to go to sleep. It's was given the title of megatrons ultimate doom part 1. Sure it was partially for me but the kids really love that stuff. And I'm happy to oblige.
I reckon I'm not the only Dad doing this stuff.
Jaxius._
5th June 2016, 09:21 AM
Profile:
Jaxius._
DOB **/11/00
I am as much of a G1 fan as the next guy, I think after my generation stops collecting (damn now i sound old) G1 will cease to exist and they will be reissuing Prime figures... But thats decades away!
GoktimusPrime
5th June 2016, 11:59 AM
I think that G1 will remain staple, but other generations may become blended. We've already seen it happen. All post-Beast Era (arguably including Car Robot) series are basically G1-inspired, but some also include elements from other series or introduce new characters...
* Car Robot; the original Japanese concept stood more on its own than Hasbro's version (RiD), as it didn't any names from G1. Even redecoed G1/G2 moulds (e.g. Brave Maximus, Spychangers, Vuldigus, Black Convoy) were given new names. Hasbro went and gave most of them G1 names, arguably making their version more "G1" than Takara's. But Hasbro did give some of their characters new names such as W.A.R.S., Rev, Hot Shot (cos they'd lost the rights for 'Hot Rod' :p), Sky-Byte, Ruination, Ro-Tor, Armourhide, Movor etc.
* Armadaverse; introduces lots of new characters including a third Mini-Con faction.
* Animated; introduces some new characters (Lugnut, Bulkhead etc.) as well as characters from BW/BM (Blackarachnia, Waspinator, Strika)
* Movieverse; most characters are G1-derived, but there are some post-G1-era characters too, e.g. The Fallen, Drift, Lockdown) and a few new characters (e.g. Stinger), and of course the idea of the Vehicons originates from Beast Machines.
* Prime; mostly G1-derived characters, but a few new ones (Airachnid, Makeshift, Darksteel, Thundertron), and of course the Vehicons are conceptually descendant from BM.
One could make a valid argument that the "G1 inspiration" in these newer series is quite light; often just name reuses because Hasbro is maintaining trademarks. So does this count as maintaining G1? I don't know if there's a definitive answer for this, but we see this happen in many other franchises too - characters which seem to bear limited or superficial relation to their original namesakes, such as Deadpool (Wolverine Origins), Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Deadpool) etc.
Going back to my first point, we have already seen Transformers series blend post-G1 or new characters with G1, but G1 still arguably remains the 'core inspiration' of these series. Especially whenever an Optimus Prime or Megatron continue to lead the warring factions. This is why I quite liked how the current RiD series has Bumblebee leading the Autobots (who remains in power after Optimus Prime's return) and Steeljaw being a de facto leader of the Decepticon remnant (I haven't watched much of S2 yet, so please no spoilers). I personally have grown sick and tired of always seeing yet another Optimus Prime or Megatron in charge. Let's face it, Hasbro are making enough toys of these characters that their trademarks are not going away any time soon. And considering that Hasbro now has multiple TF lines running concurrently, would it hurt to have at least one of them without an Optimus Prime or Megatron in it? They seem to have at least staved off bringing Megatron back to RiD, and I hope it stays that way (again, no spoilers please). I quite like how the IDW comics have placed Optimus Prime and Megatron in positions where neither have executive command of their respective factions anymore. :)
I suspect that future generations will be a continuation of what we're already seeing; G1 will continue, but Transformers will continue to become blended with post-G1 and new characters. We've seen similar things happen with other non-TF series, such as...
The Avengers
Note: also including villains (☆) and allies who weren't members of the Avengers (※)
"G1" = Thor, Ant-Man, the Wasp, Iron-Man, the Hulk, Loki☆
"G2" = Thor, Giant-Man (formerly Ant-Man), the Wasp, Iron-Man, Captain America, Baron Zemo☆, Kang the Conqueror☆, Wonder Man☆, Count Nefaria☆
"G3" = Captain America, Hawkeye, Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, Giant-Man (as Goliath; later becoming Yellowjacket), the Wasp, Hercules, Black Panther, Vision, Grim Reaper☆, Black Knight※, Black Widow※, the X-Men※
Many generations later...
(Current?) Avengers Alliance = Captain America, Black Panther, Iron-Man, Captain Marvel, Star Lord, Gamora
The Justice League
Silver/Bronze Age = Superman, Batman, Aquaman, The Flash, Green Lantern, Martian Manhunter, Wonder Woman, Green Arrow, The Atom, Black Canary
Challenge of the Super Friends = Superman, Batman, Aquaman, The Flash, Green Lantern, Hawkman, Black Vulcan, Apache Chief, Samurai
JLI (Batman: The Brave and the Bold) = Batman, Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, Blue Beetle, Booster Gold, Guy Gardner, Fire, Ice
Disclaimer: I'm not a fan of these series; this is just information that I've found from a cursory Google search and may not be completely accurate. Apologies to any actual fans reading this, but you get the point that I'm trying to make.
As we can see, subsequent incarnations of these franchises have seen a blend of characters from the first series with new characters. The current RiD series is an eclectic blend of characters who are either derived from G1 (e.g. Optimus Prime, Bumblebee, Sideswipe etc.), derived from post-G1 (e.g. Strongarm, Drift, Megatronus etc.) and new characters (e.g. Fracture, Underbite, Thunderhoof etc.). So I think that Transformers will continue along the line of maintaining characters derived from G1, but also those from other series and new characters too. Removing G1 characters entirely may be deemed as removing the "original spirit" of Transformers; much like say if they were to release a new Avengers series where none of the Avengers came from any of the previous incarnations (i.e. 100% new characters). I'm not saying that this is an inherently bad concept from a story-telling perspective, but from a marketability POV I think that consumers always demand at least some ties with the original series. I think one reason why the Doctor's Tardis' chameleon circuit is never fixed is so that the Tardis' iconic blue police box disguise remains a constant visual fixture throughout every incarnation. The Doctor may change his looks and persona (and potentially even ethnic appearance and gender), and of course, he goes through many companions; and the interior design of the Tardis has undergone many changes, but the iconic blue box has always remained. It wouldn't be the same if he finally fixed the chameleon circuit and we saw a new Doctor travelling in a new Tardis, say, shaped like a wardrobe or something. :o Even the very concept of having Autobots and Decepticons as factions is still a carry over from G1.
The only times I can think of when G1 is completely removed from Transformers is in lines that cross over with other franchises, which I think many fans don't consider to be the "proper" or "main" staple of Transformers. These include:
* Transformers Animorphs
* Transformers Crossovers, Star Wars
* Transformers Crossovers Marvel
* Disney Label
* Hello Kitty
...although with those last two, some figures have alt modes still inspired by G1 (e.g. Mickey Mouse & Hello Kitty being influenced by Optimus Prime, Donald Duck's alt mode being a yellow VW Beetle like Bumblebee). When I was in Japan in 2012, I tried to get a free bonus Arms Micron figure when I purchased my Disney Label Mickey Mouse TF, but the staff member who served me initially said that this toy didn't count as a Transformer. I then asked to speak with her manager who also made the same assertion. We then perused through the campaign's Terms and Conditions, which explicitly said 「トランスフォーマー商品」 ("Transformer product") without specifying any kind of series. They reluctantly conceded to my point and gave me the free Arms Micron figure. :rolleyes: Now of course these staff members most probably weren't Transfans, but through their eyes we can see the general public's perception of what a Transformer "should be." i.e. something that ties in or feels like G1.
IMO Beast Wars was the closest we've seen in terms of a successful (very successful) Transformers series that tried to step out of the shadow of Generation 1. And unlike Animorphs, Star Wars, Marvel, Disney or Hello Kitty, Beast Wars ran on their own steam; they didn't rely on the popularity of another franchise. But we also know that Beast Wars was initially met with a lot of skepticism and even hostility, and while BW was able to triumph over this, it was still a significant hurdle which I think Hasbro are now keen to avoid by sticking to the 'tried and true' with G1. Hasbro (well, Kenner) branched off with BW because the G1 formula had proven to be a dismal failure with Generation 2, they had to step away from G1 in order for Transformers to survive. I think that it's highly unlikely that G1 will ever suffer a "dark age" like it did in the early to mid 1990s, so it's likewise most unlikely that we'll ever see G1 go away from Transformers.
Sinnertwin
15th June 2016, 09:33 AM
In my head, it's always 1984 :p
Preach! :D:p
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.