Because you pay top dollar. You shouldn't expect cheap light plastic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zommael
If you collect other toys, you would have a better understanding why.
Printable View
Because you pay top dollar. You shouldn't expect cheap light plastic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zommael
If you collect other toys, you would have a better understanding why.
A light toy has zero to do with engineering costs. Material costs, yes, but nothing in terms of the intricacy, design considerations, licensing etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by drifand
Your comment is a complete moot point apart from in the vaguest of discussions.
I do collect other toy lines, and the pricing for Transformers is hardly "top dollar". If I were willing to pay the $100 plus prices expected these days for Play Arts Kai figures, I would expect generally better construction than I typically see with them. To go further, I have never had any issue with plastic quality with Transformers. To be quite honest, the logic that suggests weight and plastic quality are a measure of the quality of a toy would suggest a well-made ABS plastic brick is a better toy than CW Devastator. It wouldn't be and isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by drifand
What I look for in a Transformer is engineering and design; design being the artistic and appearance related facets of a toy, and engineering being the practical work used to put that in place. What fans who talk about weight don't seem to get is that better engineering leads to stronger toys (or products in general, really) that weigh less. That's why Generations Metroplex weighs less than G1 Fortress Maximus despite being on just about every level the better toy.
But even with modern lines, for some figures, the design and engineering will mean that it weighs less than another toy in the same size class. Case in point, Generations Springer (or Sandstorm, as it's the nearest comparison I have) and CW Hook (or just about any of the Devastator components). The constructions are very simple toys with limited articulation and easy transformation, whose primary design feature is the combination into Devastator. On the other hand, the Springstorm mould is a highly articulated figure which transforms into two separate relatively convincing alt modes. Taken on their own, I'd have to say Sandstorm is the better figure; it has better detailing, is better engineered with all the articulation, looks nicer in robot mode, etc - none of which is to say Hook is a bad toy, because it's not, just not as good as Sandstorm. In this case, Sandstorm weighing less isn't an aspect of the quality so much as it is a facet of the engineering; the Combiner Wars Constructicons in general need the extra strength that comes from weight to support one another as Devastator, but that doesn't mean Sandstorm is made of pixie dust or that Hasbro skimped out on quality when designing it.
Weight is a bad measure of quality because numerous other features go into the manufacture of toys. We should assess them based on how well-designed and engineered they are, not how much they weigh.
Sorry light weight does have things to do with engineering. Material like you said are all part of the engineering. Putting too much weight isn't great either, putting weight in the wrong areas is also bad engineering.Quote:
Originally Posted by millhouse
I didn't come into this thread to have a dispute, I only explain why some people feel that way.< I didn't say anyone is right or wrong, is how people expect when you throw some money into it.
Zero factor? Afraid not.
Masterpiece paper prime for $100?
Yeah okay
I actually kinda appreciate the trend moving towards lighter toys. Remember how clunky a Voyager toy was from 5+ years ago? Anything with a backpack would pretty much fall over backwards unless it had ridiculously oversized heel spurs.Quote:
Originally Posted by drifand
Lighter toys helps with balance and hence the stability of dynamic poses. Sadly they've also cut back on the number of joints/parts which absolutely ruins pose ability. What do they have against wrist joints?
I think CW Devastator would benefit from a lighter mass and stronger joints: at least for Hook, Bonecrusher and Scavenger. The weight makes outstretched limbs sag. But hey, a Devy of that scale is an achievement in itself and progress is always in baby steps.
Cost would be my assumption. That and potential for choking hazards/child safety standards across multiple markets.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lint
Well if you let ages 1-3 play with this, then it sure answers a lot of questions about materials, weight and a whole different category.
I think the toy is fine if you paid rrp for it. Sure a lot of things can be better but this is not a masterpiece.
As for weight of this toy, is exactly what I expected. And I am not saying it should be lighter or heavier.
I think he's far from MP quality but combined he's super impressive. Great articulation, solid joints, well proportioned and aesthetically hes very pretty.
The individual figures are a disappointment. Mixmaster is borderline G1 quality. Elbows are awful. None of the transformations are particularly clever. Scrapper is the only one that comes remotely near MP in terms of articulation and proportions. Everyone else just looks a bit weird.
But all those issues dont worry me, i bought it for Devy and as Devy im satisfied with him as much as one of my MP's.
i just put it all together, this thing is huge lol
Yeah me too! Devastator is massive.Quote:
Originally Posted by philby
Loving the G1 homage, especially the head sculpts. The figures feel solid, but with a good balance of weight that allows greater movement and more poses.
As much as I enjoy the set, it would've been nice if the crane arm on hook could be detracted (sticks out a bit too much in combined mode) and the chest wing parts featured different plug ins (rather than peg holes that feel like they're going to snap when I pull the wing apart).
I have the TakTom UW set and for an extra $10 the significant improvements in design and paint apps as well as additional accessories are well worth it.
On a side note - I think "Not even interested" should be removed as a voting option on a toy review poll. Aren't we all here to vote on a toy that we've actually purchased and discussing design/quality etc? Seems like a redundant voting option. Doesn't add much value if some people aren't even interested in buying the reviewed toy in question :confused: