Quote:
Originally Posted by
GoktimusPrime
:eek: Umm... 'kay... :rolleyes:
Terran laws and precedents don't necessarily apply to alien civilisations set in a galaxy far, far away. I can think of no canonical evidence that supports your assertions in the Star Wars universe. So let's just stick with what we know is true in Star Wars according to what canonical evidence exists from the films.
:rolleyes: :D
Quote:
First of all, Han does have the Force. All living things are attuned to the Force. Force Users are merely special individuals with an unusually high Midichlorian count in their blood^heightened sensitivity to the Force. And just because Han isn't Force sensitive doesn't mean that Ben would love him any less.
This is stretching it a bit much but you aren't getting the point. ;)
Quote:
Shmi Skywalker wasn't Force sensitive, but Anakin Skywalker always loved her.
You are missing the point that there was no Dad in the picture. This is default. It's not because she isn't force sensitive. Two totally different situations.
Quote:
In the absence of any canonical evidence to the contrary, I think that it is reasonable to assume that Han was an equally loving parent to Ben as Leia was. Leia did say that perhaps giving Ben away to Luke for training (and thus separating themselves from Ben) might've been a mistake, but she used plural first person pronouns, which means that they were both equally guilty of this. It was words to the effect of, "We should never have..."; this implies that if Ben is going to hold a grudge against one parent, he would also hold it against the other.
Han left to become a smuggler during Ben's conflicted time. At least Leia had responsibilities to the republic/rebels as a valid excuse to not be there for Kylo when he was conflicted. There's no evidence either way so it isn't reasonable to assume either way. Being both equally at fault just means that they do not blame what the other did even if each thinking that he/she is more at fault. Guilt/blame doesn't really help their situation so it was pointless to focus on that.
Quote:
Furthermore, if Ben had a biased love towards his mother over his father, then surely Leia would've volunteered to go and get Ben back from Starkiller base instead of letting Han do it alone. Or if she was urgently needed at the Resistance Base, she would at least instruct Han to call her and let her speak with Ben should he find him.
If you say so :rolleyes: and if you think that a call is equivalent to being there.
Quote:
And Han would not have been a one night stand who knocked up Leia and then buggered off. Han and Leia had a massive romance in The Empire Strikes Back and The Return of the Jedi where Leia risked her life to save Han from Jabba the Hutt. The Force Awakens states that the relationship between Han, Leia and Ben didn't fall apart until after Ben became Kylo Ren and destroyed Luke's New Jedi Order. Ren wouldn't be emotionally conflicted over killing Han if he were such a bad father. You could tell that they both still loved each other, which made Ren's act of murdering him so difficult.
Still not getting it? :rolleyes: I just meant that his role in guiding Ben is lacking as he doesn't know what it's truly like to have that kind of power. Han couldn't teach Ben as he isn't "Force sensitive". Expanding the extent of their romantic relationship isn't the point. You can always love someone but not be there for them. Han didn't want to come home to Leia.
Quote:
Of course Anakin chooses power in the end, but it wasn't a quick decision. If it were 'easy' for Anakin, he would never have let Windu touch Palpatine in the first place. Heck, he probably would never have dobbed Palpatine into the Jedi either.
You didn't get the point. The comparison is choosing to kill your parent versus a head Jedi. I said it would be "easier" to kill Windu than it is to kill your own flesh and blood just so that you can have "power".
I'll end this here before it goes into a further long winded sidetracked discussion. :cool: