Originally Posted by
OptimusNerd
Disclaimer: I completely understand why people are annoyed, anxious, etc. when it comes to items they've pre-paid for and haven't received. Compounded by the slow/lack of communication, and uncertain ETAs.
But... I still don't see where anything illegal has occurred. You're entering into a purchase agreement for a yet-to-be-released product which has an ETA which is specified as "subject to change". The problem is language that speaks of "not delivered within a reasonable time when there is no agreed end date" as there is no specified definition of reasonable. PC isn't holding stuff in a warehouse somewhere and just not shipping yours... they are delayed getting stuff, which is (arguably) out of their control. As far as I'm aware they've had language tantamount to "ETAs are subject to change" on their products for a long time.
Anyway, like I said - I understand people's frustrations. But I also kind of think that the ACCC may try to mediate just to be helpful, but I doubt there's anything illegal that's actually occurring.
Every time I see a post on FB or here threatening legal/ACCC action I kind of find myself thinking of those times I CC:-d (fake) lawyers on correspondence I sent to companies just to seemingly make it look more official/threatening.