Harry Porter Deathly Hallows P2 - 3D or normal?

[Tetsuwan Convoy]

I saw it in 3D... not because I wanted to, but because the 2D showings are very, very limited. 3D was all I could get... having said that, it was great!! The 3D was excellent; some shots were brilliant. It was a little dark at times (light wise) which didn't help the 3D, but overall it was a positive experience!

Wow. Did we see the same film? I caught it in 3D and halfway through I was wondering why I had these damn glasses on. I thought that perhaps as the spells started flying the 3D might come into play... Nope. Film finished and I turned to the wife and she said before I could "Why was that in 3d?"

Just like Pirates 4, it's a waste of a 3d film. It got to the point for me where I wanted to take the glasses off and just watch the damn thing normally. but then everything was blurry.

See it in 2d, you aren't missing anything.

was an Ok film though. Not the best but was nice to see the ending.

[Robzy]

Wow. Did we see the same film? I caught it in 3D and halfway through I was wondering why I had these damn glasses on.

Evidently not I've heard/read some people can't see 3D the same way others can, so maybe that's the issue?! Not sure. All I know is, while it wasn't on the level of Avatar, the 3D in "some" shots (as I wrote) was amazing. But, like Tron Legacy or DOTM, it was limited.

See it in 2d, you aren't missing anything

Yeah, I agree... and that would be my recommendation too. Unfortunately, however, as I wrote in my first post, I had no choice! 2D screenings were limited to one per day at my local.

[Tetsuwan Convoy]

Evidently not I've heard/read some people can't see 3D the same way others can, so maybe that's the issue?! Not sure. All I know is, while it wasn't on the level of Avatar, the 3D in "some" shots (as I wrote) was amazing. But, like Tron Legacy or DOTM, it was limited.

I think it has more to do with expextations than interpretation of 3d. If I see a 3D movie, I want ther to be justification for the 3D. Harry 7 Pt1 was filmed 2d, then they thought to convert to 3d, but didn't have enough time so released in 2d afterall. Obviously part 2 was filmed 2d and converted afterwards. However I dont think they took into account the effects of 3d when filming, hence the lacklustre 3d in Harry.

Some Good 3d films (IMO) are Up (3D added depth to the world and adventure), Avavtar (filmed with 3d cameras and was aided in immersion), thor (asgard and ice world place looked good in 3d, I think this filmed did well). transformers 3, robots look cool! Kung Fu panda 2 (fireworks!!)

Bad 3D filsm, Pirates 4, Harry 7 pt2, clash of Titans. Why? because just 2d films convetered into 3d without appropriate thought of how to use the 3d. I dont want to see that. that is why Transformers 1 & 2 and the Star Wars movies when converted will suck (in regards to 3D films).

that is also why I think I will pass on Capt America in 3D. It just doesn't Justify it.