Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Universe Armada Minicon Pack

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    Typically lazy? I think not.
    Dude... have you ever looked at some of the Universe repaints? Take Razorclaw for example. They stripped him of chrome, changed allegiances without worrying about the logo on his chest and sold him for the same price despite the loss of chrome.

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    These Mini-Con molds were never intended for the 2006 Classics line, but like the Real Gear Robots, they were originally made for the Cybertron Mini-Con 2 packs (that's why some teams were a little weird). So in terms of continuity they were originally intended to be Unicron Trilogy toys.
    Guess what - they're not Unicron Trilogy toys. It's not like these toys appeared in Armada - in fact they were first released several years _after_ Armada. So calling them Armada when they're now Classics moulds just doesn't work.

    You don't see people referring to the unreleased G2 Spychanger moulds (Daytonus) etc as G2 toys, do you? They're associated with RiD.

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    Since Mini-Cons are representative of the Armada era, they go under the Armada subtitle in Universe.
    Yes, but only because there's no pride in 95% of Hasbro's repaints
    Last edited by dirge; 15th July 2008 at 11:11 PM.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  2. #2
    Join Date
    29th Apr 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    Dude... have you ever looked at some of the Universe repaints? Take Razorclaw for example. They stripped him of chrome, changed allegiances without worrying about the logo on his chest and sold him for the same price despite the loss of chrome.

    Yes, but only because there's no pride in 95% of Hasbro's repaints
    Then its fortunate that the early Universe (2003) line was not actually done by Hasbro's Transformers team.

    Much of Hasbro's redecos in the past five years have been more or less similar to Takara's, and I challenge you not to find heart in the redecos Joe Kyde does.

    Guess what - they're not Unicron Trilogy toys. It's not like these toys appeared in Armada - in fact they were first released several years _after_ Armada. So calling them Armada when they're now Classics moulds just doesn't work.

    You don't see people referring to the unreleased G2 Spychanger moulds (Daytonus) etc as G2 toys, do you? They're associated with RiD.
    Doesn't matter. Thematically Mini-Cons are associated with Armada (given that's where they mostly appeared in), just as Energon stuff is associated with Energon and Cyber Keys are with Cybertron. Given how successful the Armada line was (in spite of collector hatred), it would be safe to assume that there is a large portion of the public that still associate Mini-Cons with Transformers Armada.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    That's a matter of preferencial perception - the fact is that they're not part of the Armada line. Just as Universe Razorclaw, Nemesis Prime and Depth Charge are not part of the Beast Wars line.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,192

    Default

    I don't consider the 'classics' "minicons" to even be minicons.
    They don't have the molded minicon insignia on them.

  5. #5
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    Who really cares though? Minicons suck the biggest arse, and the only set not to are the cybertron minicon recon team.

    I've got all of the minicon sets released through cybertron, so I have a pretty good idea on how to rate them. And yea, the combiner/weapon ones are the worst for falling to bits.
    ________
    Ford Ltd (North America) Picture
    Last edited by MV75; 11th March 2011 at 10:04 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    Then its fortunate that the early Universe (2003) line was not actually done by Hasbro's Transformers team.
    If they were, you have to wonder who sewed their eyes shut

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    Much of Hasbro's redecos in the past five years have been more or less similar to Takara's, and I challenge you not to find heart in the redecos Joe Kyde does.
    Oh yeah, Kyde's repaints are great. It's a shame that the remainder of them are so uninspired.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  7. #7
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    I consider the Classics Minicons to be just that - Classics Minicons (i.e.: that they are Mini-Cons and part of the Classics line). It's as simple as that. Similar to how a lot of people would still classify the Universe Micromaster gestalts as Micromasters even though Hasbro didn't specifically call them that during Universe and at the same time they're not technically part of G1 (they're essentially reissues repackaged and in cases repainted). Also, official canon makes the Classics Minicons part of the Classics universe (which takes place as an alternate off shoot from the G1 comics instead of Generation 2), clearly portraying them as being in a different continuity from the Armadaverse.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    I consider the Classics Minicons to be just that - Classics Minicons (i.e.: that they are Mini-Cons and part of the Classics line). It's as simple as that. Similar to how a lot of people would still classify the Universe Micromaster gestalts as Micromasters even though Hasbro didn't specifically call them that during Universe and at the same time they're not technically part of G1 (they're essentially reissues repackaged and in cases repainted). Also, official canon makes the Classics Minicons part of the Classics universe (which takes place as an alternate off shoot from the G1 comics instead of Generation 2), clearly portraying them as being in a different continuity from the Armadaverse.
    Exactly, read "Games of Deception" for the origin of the "Classics" minicons

  9. #9
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roller View Post
    Exactly, read "Games of Deception" for the origin of the "Classics" minicons
    I've read it but for the life of me, I can't remember.

    - STL, surprised by how much conversation Mini-Cons can start
    Collection Count (w/ a 12.42% upsize): 3053
    New Family Members: DA-15 Jetwing Prime, DOTM Leader Ironhide, Perfect Effect Reflector, DOTM Shockwave & Skyhammer, eHobby United 3-packs
    Current Desires: Japanese BW Optimal Optimus
    The Holy Grail: Ultmetal Optimus Prime


    Visit the Wonderful World of: The Iacon City Hub-Capital Collection

  10. #10
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    The Classics comic is rather poor but the minicon bit at the end involving the Last Autobot is rather interesting. A shame that it omits G2 and Marvel UK though.

    Now, as discussed to death, yeah those Minicons do not belong in the Armada verse, nameslapping them like that is a typical Archer/Hasbro lazy move.

    Its not a good thing when people accept everything a company does no matter how bad or lazy as it doesn't encourage them to improve. Hasbro knows that the majority of fans are accepting their stuff like candy no matter how bad and that is why they are unashamedly lazy on repaints and the quality of their products.

    The Animated line is an example of this lazy 'uninterested' approach that Hasbro has and I am not referring about the style, design or cartoon. It was a real shame that a 'Repair Guide' had to be produced within the same week the toys were released in the US.
    Last edited by kup; 17th July 2008 at 09:57 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •