View Poll Results: Worth buying?

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 46.43%
  • Only if...

    7 25.00%
  • No

    4 14.29%
  • Not even interested

    4 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Toy Review - Transformers Platinum Edition Omega Supreme

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    $300 is still damn expensive... you could buy a Fortress Maximus for that price!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    3rd Nov 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    For the 3rd party Genesis, also remember that's $300 in US Dollars, not Australian, and also doesn't include shipping So it will be at least $400 probably more!

    Platinum edition on the other hand is a quarter of that price. Its a large figure, and is a good display piece as a classics Omega. It looks good with generations figures, towering over even voyager figures. It may be a overly simple transformer, so its lacking. For this reason its understandable that people who already own the Energon version in the past want to avoid it.

    Looking forward to when Hasbro finally gets to doing a proper Omega Supreme with a brand new mold.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    7th Mar 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    6,605

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Defcon View Post
    For the 3rd party Genesis, also remember that's $300 in US Dollars, not Australian, and also doesn't include shipping So it will be at least $400 probably more!

    Platinum edition on the other hand is a quarter of that price. Its a large figure, and is a good display piece as a classics Omega. It looks good with generations figures, towering over even voyager figures. It may be a overly simple transformer, so its lacking. For this reason its understandable that people who already own the Energon version in the past want to avoid it.

    Looking forward to when Hasbro finally gets to doing a proper Omega Supreme with a brand new mold.
    I've never liked Energon Omega. I always thought it looked cheap and simple. The alt mode IMO is rather silly with next to zero effort put into it.

    Yes I agree Genesis is expensive, that's why I don't own it. But it is an infinitely superior representation of the character (WARNING: The previous sentence is opinion only). When I look at YOTS Omega, it makes me think that at Hasbro they went: "You know, they say you can't polish a turd. But maybe we can give it a fresh coat of paint and a shiny box!"
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain

  4. #4
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Each have their own here, obviously so fans are restricted to G1 thinking and will stick to the G1 design of What Omega is, a space station.

    But I come way back before Transformers was even borned, I seen the Diaclone version and is a kid's toy made into Omega Supreme.

    Yes I saw the Planet X from ebay hence the expensive tag.
    To me it looked flimsy, nice cannons and claw arms but I like to see Tomy Takara's take on a MP version.

    Now for $98 bucks this guy looks solid in the shelf with original G1 colours. The head sculpt is well done. Unlike the Energon version, I was hesitating whether to buy it. Getting the claw hand right was the key selling point.

    Mind you, I am more a real robot collector than Transformer's fan collector, so someone who raves about the old Soundwave I won't bother as to me MP 13 surpass it.

  5. #5
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    To further understand my view, this is where I begin from

    http://www.toyarchive.com/Diaclone/G...atronMIB1.html

    Omega's original design was already dated because I already seen it when I was a 5 year old.

    Basically Omega came out as transformers much later.

    I understand the frustration of the Energon version because we seen better quality toys from Takara. Realise here I am not mentioning Hasbro because they are normally the lesser quality version.

    I have to say, yes if you hated Energon Omega in the first place you wont take a second glance at YOTS version. But for me, this was it for NOW.

    Shiny box aside, the toy is fun, imo reminds me enough of the Omega G1 and is just simply awsome.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    Each have their own here, obviously so fans are restricted to G1 thinking and will stick to the G1 design of What Omega is, a space station.
    I don't have a problem with the alt mode not being a rocket base. That's never been the basis for my criticism of this mould. The issue is the incredibly simplistic and underwhelming engineering and design of the toy for something so big and expensive. The entire transformation is basically split the robot in half, straightened them out and lie them down.

    I don't mind if the alt mode is different from the G1 toy. I understand that it's not G1 -- Energon was never G1. The issue is in the engineering/design. Look at Generations Darkmount. His tank mode is entirely different from the space cannon mode of G1 Straxus, but it's a good tank mode and a well designed solid action figure. So I really do quite like the toy because it's well made.

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    But I come way back before Transformers was even borned, I seen the Diaclone version and is a kid's toy made into Omega Supreme.
    Technical point: Omega Supreme wasn't a Diaclone but was from another line called Super Change Robo. The toy's name was Mechabot 1. It wasn't made by Takara, but by another company called Toy Box which was since bought out by Tomy. After Tomy merged with Takara, Takara obtained the rights to the Toy Box Transformer moulds; namely Mechabot 1 and the other robot who was used as Sky Lynx, hence both Omega Supreme and Sky Lynx were reissued in the Encore line.
    http://pic2.actoys.net/attachment/Mo...f320e7d.jpg?89

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    Now for $98 bucks this guy looks solid in the shelf with original G1 colours. The head sculpt is well done. Unlike the Energon version, I was hesitating whether to buy it. Getting the claw hand right was the key selling point.
    Oh yeah, visually this toy is great. As I said, the colours work a lot better on this version ('cept the wheels - I would've preferred if they'd kept them the same colour as the original Energon OS), and the new head looks fantastic. It has been criticised for being small, but it needs to be that size in order for it to transform correctly and also connect w/ the YotS Optimus Prime vehicles. So it's really as big as they could make the head without compromising the existing play features on the toy.

    But as I said, the issue is the rather substandard engineering/design of the Energon Supreme mould, and this version has further sacrificed some of the original toy's play features to make it look more like War For Cybertron Omega Supreme. The Headmaster gimmick - gone. The transformable neck - gone. The grabbing claw gimmick - gone. It's just a less fun toy to play with. They've taken what was an ordinary toy and made it even more dull (but more visually appealing). Form over function.

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    To further understand my view, this is where I begin from

    Omega's original design was already dated because I already seen it when I was a 5 year old.

    Basically Omega came out as transformers much later.
    Sure, but as I said by 1980s standards this toy wasn't a bad figure. The robot mode is blocky, but that was commonplace in G1. Articulated robot modes didn't come along until late G2 and wasn't standardised until Beast Wars. Having a blocky robot mode was acceptable by the standards of the day. And if anything, Omega Supreme arguably has better arm and head articulation than a lot of other G1 Transformers. He has 9 points of articulation. And as I said, he does have multiple motorised gimmicks for walking, tank rolling, turret spinning, barrel moving and light up window. Yeah sure, the transformation is pretty much pull every thing apart and put it back together, and you have those annoying little yellow clips (which would be a beeyotch to lose)... but overall it's a reasonably decent toy by G1 standards as the first baseformer. Subsequent baseformers did improve on the design by have far more self contained parts (which isn't hard ), but also none of them are trying to have a continuous track running around that allows a motorised vehicle to run along it. So it's kinda like comparing apples and oranges.

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    I understand the frustration of the Energon version because we seen better quality toys from Takara. Realise here I am not mentioning Hasbro because they are normally the lesser quality version.
    Eeh... it's not even that. In general we saw a decline in engineering/design in Armada and Energon with a lot of toys being compromised by their gimmicks (giving birth to the fan term "wHy My ShOuLdErS hUrT?" ). Before Armada we had Beast Wars and Car Robot/RiD which gave us slews of just amazing toys and pushed the envelope in terms of toy engineering and design. Armada and Energon felt like a significant step backward from that. IMO some of the best toys from Armada and Energon were actually the Mini-Cons rather than the Autobots and Decepticons. Takara's versions were cosmetically nicer (and the LED gimmick on Micron Legend Hot Rod was really cool), but still basically the same toys with the same weaknesses (ML Hot Rod's shoulders still hurt!). To Hasbro's credit, Cybertron was a much better line -- it looked like they'd finally gotten the hang of creating toys with gimmicks that compliment the toy without overtly compromising their design.

    I don't think that the Energon Omega Supreme mould is bad per se. It does have a lot of neat features and fun things about it, even with the YotS modifications. But I don't think it's a great toy either. But given how expensive the toy is, one would expect more. Having said that, YotS Omega Supreme is substantially cheaper than Energon Omega Supreme's original retail price IIRC, so that's a plus.

  7. #7
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    RID was a pain with Ultra Magnus and Prime, as much as it was nice, I could not pass it as a transformer, it was almost jigsaw puzzle for me.

    The only reason why I rave about YOTS Omega way because the head looks better even than the Project X which I feel it was a let down at that price tag. The arm and the claws of that guy is wonderful however when I watch the youtube it look vulnerable to break. and the proportion of the legs do not look big enough. The arms were the weakest link and soon in time the joints wont hold up.

    G1 Omega is a pass for me, it is nice in the cartoon but for a toy is not something I will really go with. Again is very selective on how I look at Omega. In the cartoon for G1, is awesome! The toy is totally not what I am after in this case.

    Granted a fan is subjective on Omega's originality as well. But I am having fun with a toy I know it looks good enough to pose. You could really pose it up and it would make people buy it in a snap when they see how nice it can be.

    I thought project X would be fantastic, and is probably is, however, I just kind of fear of some issues with the design. For that amount, I put my money into Metroplex.

    Again I am coming from some different perspective and I think this toy was a bit underrated. A lot of people are just going by "Same thing, different colour" Which is true, however the claw hands and the head was a straight bang, this is Omega Supreme in another mode.

    I do like to see Takara come up with a new G1 omega supreme with a new serious take on it. because by far only Project X by 3rd party is the only one, and I don't feel too comfortable sinking money for that piece.

    I do see your view on it though, but for me is a good piece to display as to half wondering whether should I buy the Energon version back in the older days.

    Also I am not interested in YOTS Optimus nor Ultra Magnus. This is also where I am coming from as to me it doesn't cut it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •