Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Leaked Movie Optimus toy image

  1. #1
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,468

    Default Leaked Movie Optimus toy image

    So I was looking at the leaked shots of AOE Optimus' toy and I'm just not liking him. As someone that wants to love everything Transformers I hope the final CGI design changes my mind.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    (gave this its own topic, as the more interesting figures can get more attention this way)

    This figure appears to be an photo of the back of packaging, perhaps for some upcoming trade show or convention. (America Toyfair is still 2 months away)
    It is different to the previous one shown off as being a "Generations" figure, and judging by the number of steps (15) is well above their Deluxe size (which will be promoted in 2014 as only being about 5 steps).


    It was funny to see on TFW that the photo was taken down after a couple minutes, and there was 5 pages of people wishing that someone had saved a copy so that it could be reposted.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    11th Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Interesting. Aside from the presumably "simplified" transformation and the back kibble, this one looks better than the Leader Generations figure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th May 2008
    Location
    Back in Brisbane
    Posts
    2,477

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doublespy View Post
    Interesting. Aside from the presumably "simplified" transformation and the back kibble, this one looks better than the Leader Generations figure.
    This is my impression too.
    "I am not a gun. I'm hitting people with a hammer. On Mars."
    The Iron Giant / David Wildgoose

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th Feb 2013
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,019

    Default

    Simplified transformation isn't a problem. It's when the toys themselves are simplified by losing detail such as sculpting and articulation that it's a problem. This does not look like that, thankfully.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    31st Jul 2008
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    1,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zommael View Post
    Simplified transformation isn't a problem. It's when the toys themselves are simplified by losing detail such as sculpting and articulation that it's a problem. This does not look like that, thankfully.
    I agree 100%. The ROTF toys were AMAZING, but too bloody hard for a kid to do. Which has led them to going too far the other way and producing their own over-sized legends figures (beating the Chinese KO producers to the punch I suppose!).

    When I watch my kids struggle with a transformer, it's not how complicated it is that's the problem, it's how fiddly it is that causes the most grief. If all the panels line up easily, and the instructions are clearly written, then it's no problem.

    I've often sent Hasbro the (rather obvious) suggestion that they post instruction videos on their websites for all their toys.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,089

    Default

    What's with the big blue crotch plate

  8. #8
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2011
    Location
    Rylstone
    Posts
    8,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1orion2many View Post
    What's with the big blue crotch plate
    If you were in danger of being kicked in the ball-bearings by a 40-foot tall Decepticon, wouldn't you want one?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    11th Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zommael View Post
    Simplified transformation isn't a problem. It's when the toys themselves are simplified by losing detail such as sculpting and articulation that it's a problem. This does not look like that, thankfully.
    Sadly, for the movie aesthetics, simplified transformation really means losing details or being far from screen accurate, because the concept artists never really think about how or if possible at all their design can be translated into working toys.

    One vehicle panel the artist arbitrarily throws on the robot might make the poor engineers over at TakTom work overtime to get it working for toys. Yet people still complain about "fake chests" and "fake kibble".

  10. #10
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTransformerTrev View Post
    If you were in danger of being kicked in the ball-bearings by a 40-foot tall Decepticon, wouldn't you want one?
    No my ball bearings would be dent proof if I in turn was a 40ft Robot

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •