Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Fan Edits

  1. #1
    Join Date
    6th Aug 2010
    Location
    Warrnambool
    Posts
    1,126

    Default Fan Edits

    Ok so these officially don't exist...so what I am saying I'm not actually saying

    However, has anyone seen any? The ROTF edit has me very interested; there was so much garbage in that flick, and yet, some moments of coolness and potential

    I have the fan edit of SW a new hope ANC it's pure brilliance. It's become my version to watch and that says a lot

    So interested to hear of anyone's experiences with the TF franchise

  2. #2
    Join Date
    10th May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gofigure View Post
    Ok so these officially don't exist...so what I am saying I'm not actually saying

    However, has anyone seen any? The ROTF edit has me very interested; there was so much garbage in that flick, and yet, some moments of coolness and potential

    I have the fan edit of SW a new hope ANC it's pure brilliance. It's become my version to watch and that says a lot

    So interested to hear of anyone's experiences with the TF franchise
    TBH, I despise fan edits, with the exception being restorative work (see the recent Star Wars that is compiled from a range of sources).

    My thoughts are the same as they are of fan films, and as someone who's produced a few shorts and production managed a feature, unless you've got permission from the rights holder, it's not yours. You didn't work on it, you didn't have to answer to someone who's looking at a $200m bill and trying to test it across four quadrants worth of demographics, and you didn't have to release it to a particular date in order to best recoup your investment. My attitude is, generally speaking, go play with your toys in the sandbox.

    I dig the first Bayformers, but loathe the two sequels. But I look at the realities of the industry and if it's not my $200m that's paid for it, it ain't mine to frak with. I may not like the product, and that's where my choice comes in. But a tonne of people worked really hard to make that film, and I think you have to respect their work, even if you don't like it.

    Personal opinion, and not an attack on you by any means!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    6th Aug 2010
    Location
    Warrnambool
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    No sweat at all man.

    Was more interested and curious of others opinions. Haven't seem much at all in the way of these films

    I did find Star Wars revisited edit something pretty special and was quite pleased with some of the modifications. Not just the whole 'Han shot first' stuff but the way the discussion between Luke and obiwan plays out differently due to how it's structured. It's a subtle change but makes a lot more sense. If you have seen it you will understand. But I digress.

    Ownership and investment are important considerations and I take that. But I could see how making a number of changes to a film like ROTF could make it watchable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    10th May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gofigure View Post
    Not just the whole 'Han shot first' stuff but the way the discussion between Luke and obiwan plays out differently due to how it's structured. It's a subtle change but makes a lot more sense. If you have seen it you will understand.
    Having been a Star Wars fan that has slowly become less interested over the past 23 years (and the decisions of Lucas are considerable factors in that), I do admit to loving deleted scenes, particularly of those films.

    The version I'd recommend is the Despecialized Edition. Contains a tonne of different sound mixes and so much effort to restore and recomposite footage based on what's available. Truly a guy who wants to leave the best possible preservation of the film available in 1977, etc. 18GB, but worth every meg.


    Ownership and investment are important considerations and I take that. But I could see how making a number of changes to a film like ROTF could make it watchable.
    I remember running projection at cinemas during that time and there is so much that I couldn't get into. At least with TF1, it was that Spielbergian touch of a boy and his first car - a great central "in" for the audience. I could ignore the wacky humour and keep entertained. Part 2 was just a case of "more Fox! more wacky!" and quite frankly, I'd rather watch the 86 animated film, which remains to my mind, the very best example of Transformers ever put to any screen.

    Then again, its all personal choice, 'innit? :P

  5. #5
    Join Date
    6th Aug 2010
    Location
    Warrnambool
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    The megan Fox scene straddling the bike was laughable.....i felt bad for her...and the bike

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    But if you cut all the nonsense out of Revenge of the Fallen, wouldn't the film then just run for about 10 minutes?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2011
    Location
    Rylstone
    Posts
    8,433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    But if you cut all the nonsense out of Revenge of the Fallen, wouldn't the film then just run for about 10 minutes?
    You'd have:
    *Ravage landing then later fighting Jeeps - 3 minutes
    *Long Haul looking through ruins - 15 seconds
    *The fight between Optimus, Megs, SScream and Grindor in the forest - 4 minutes


    So 7 & 1/4 minutes by my calculations

  8. #8
    Join Date
    10th May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTransformerTrev View Post
    So 7 & 1/4 minutes by my calculations
    Still too long for me, given the overly-busy designs. :P

  9. #9
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,558

    Default

    Getting on soapbox...

    I'm anti-fan edit. I believe in the artistic merit of film, music and games.

    It's the directors vision and he/she has the privilege of making a bad movie if he/she chooses. We may not like it but it's Bay's right as an artist to make a bad movie.

    I have no problem with George Lucas's current versions of the Star Wars Saga and it's his right to make changes if he wants. Sure TPM and AOTC are not great and ROTS is passable at best but it's his vision.

    The fan has no legal or moral right to re-edit and distribute what they think a movie should be.

    Now I'll get off my soapbox.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    Anybody can edit a film to their liking. I wouldn't call that talent.
    I'd prefer to see them make their own instead.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •