Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 138

Thread: The Universal Counting Method

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,743

    Default

    i think we can just treat this as a guideline and to many new fans, this might work out for them. For others, we might agree or disagree to some of the rulez but the final decision is always ours.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,150

    Default

    Does it all really matter? Most important part is you like what you collect, yeah? Me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,104

    Default

    I don't know why I've let myself get bothered over this. Must be childhood remnants of my lack of respect for authority. As long as the system lacks democratic review, I will be forced to use my own method. If you don't want to count my poll responses, don't. I'm not competing anyway.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    It only matters when you want to make a direct comparison and participate in the annual survey. Outside of that you can use whatever counting method you want.

    If you want to participate in direct comparisons with other people, you need to be using a common system - whether it's the Universal Counting Method or not - you all have to agree on the same set of rules. When it comes to the annual survey, it has already been decided that we will use the Universal Counting Method. I proposed the formulation of the UCM back in 2005/6 for the express purpose of conducting annual surveys!

    If you really object to using the UCM in any way, shape or form, fine... don't participate in the annual survey. Because in order to participate in the annual survey, you must follow the same counting rules as everyone else otherwise it's just plain unfair.

    Suggesting that you want to participate in the annual survey but you don't want to follow the same rules as everyone else is akin to saying that you want to play a sport but you refuse to follow the rules of that sport or that you want to participate in a certain community, but you refuse to speak the common language of that community.

    For example, let's face it - English is a royally messed up language. Words are often not spelt the way that they sound and for virtually every rule in this stupid language there are plenty of exceptions. e.g.:
    + English word order is supposed to be Subject-Verb-Object, such as in "I have toys"; but then you have sentences like "What toys do you have?" which is Object-Subject-Verb! Buh?
    + In the word "go" g = /g/, in "giraffe" g = /dz/, in "through" g is silent, in "cough" g = /f/ and in "genre" g = /j/ - confused yet?
    + "i before e except after c" except for beige, cleidoic, codeine, conscience, deify, deity, deign, dreidel, eider, eight, either, feign, feint, feisty, foreign, forfeit, freight, gleisation, gneiss, greige, greisen, heifer, heigh-ho, height, heinous, heir, heist, leitmotiv, neigh, neighbor, neither, peignoir, prescient, rein, science, seiche, seidel, seine, seismic, seize, sheik, society, sovereign, surfeit, teiid, veil, vein, weight, weir and weird. Good rule, eh?

    ...but despite the cumbersome/awkward nature of English, if you choose to actively participate in an English-speaking community then you must accept the fact that you have to speak English. If you don't want to speak English, then don't actively participate in an English-speaking community! You don't have to speak the language of a community in order to function in it.

    Likewise you don't have to use the Universal Counting Method as a Transformer collector. You only have to use it if you choose to participate in the annual survey, and it's recommended (but with no obligation) that you use it in other direct comparisons.

    If you don't want to ever participate in the survey or make direct comparisons with other collectors - that's fine. Don't use the UCM.

    Quote Originally Posted by jaydisc
    As long as the system lacks democratic review, I will be forced to use my own method.
    As dirge and I have explained to you, the system needs be locked in order for it to work for comparisons between surveys. If we opened it up for regular revision then it wouldn't work!

    Quote Originally Posted by jaydisc
    If you don't want to count my poll responses, don't. I'm not competing anyway.
    That would be the best thing for you to do (or not do) if you really object to this system that strongly.

    Don't like a particular sport? Don't play it. Don't like a particular language? Don't speak it. Don't like the Universal Counting Method for the annual Transformer collection count survey? Don't participate in the survey.

    That's fine.

    ---------------------------------------------

    And that is the last I will say about that.

    As I said at the beginning of this thread, the rationale for this system is not open to debate. The opportunity for debating all this was available in the polls and will be available in future polls. But what has been set is set and there's nothing to be gained by any further debating about it.

    This thread was made as a handy reference for the UCM rules - NOT to debate its validity.

    People are welcome to ask questions about understanding the rules - such as Borgeman's question about Article19 - that's fine. You are welcome to ask questions about clarification of rules, but not to debate about its validity. We've already had those debates.

    Let's all get back on topic now!

    Thank you.
    Last edited by GoktimusPrime; 30th January 2008 at 04:34 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,599

    Default

    lets ask hasbro how to count, surely they must have a counting system to record their past products?


    why ami typing this?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Hasbro's counting method is basically like a stock inventory listing. Great if you're a distributor or retailer, but I don't think it's all that ideal for collectors.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,104

    Default

    Targetmasters count? (Is a Targetmaster a "nebulan"?)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    A Targetmaster is a Transformer whose gun can transform into a humanoid. In Anglophone continuity the gun component is called a Nebulan whereas in Japanese continuity they're Master robots - toywise they're the same thing. So let's take Kup and Recoil for example - Kup is a Targetmaster and Recoil is his Nebulan partner.

    As far as the UCM is concerned, the Targetmaster Transformer (e.g.: Kup) counts but the Nebulan partner (e.g.: Recoil) does not count. So if you have Targetmaster Kup, with or without Recoil, it counts as 1.

    Click here to learn more about Nebulans.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    8th Jun 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,306

    Default

    How about two of the same toy, one repainted (by yourself) into a different character? Do they count as 2? Do customs count as well?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •