Page 4 of 29 FirstFirst ... 234567891424 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 286

Thread: SPOILER THREAD: SW: The Force Awakens

  1. #31
    Join Date
    19th Mar 2015
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raider View Post
    There is no doubt that there are similarities, specifically done on purpose I would guess. However, I do not think that these similarities, done for nostalgia and as a nod to the original trilogy, take away from the originality of the story line.

    Of course, if you want to look at the story in a vacuum and speak in generalities, then yes of course you can make it seem very similar to A New Hope. However, when you start to look at the differences you will see the originality behind it and in particular the different dynamic of the characters. That is the key difference; the characters are very very different in nature other than a comparison between Luke and Rey both being raised in a dessert environment and not knowing their past/force abilities.

    However the similarities stop there. Rey is clearly a survivor. She has been on her own for a long time and does what she needs to in order to survive. She had no desire to leave Jakku (even if she always knew there was nothing really holding her there). Her command of the force seems to far exceed what Luke's was from the time they first became aware of their abilities - she is already using mind control. Contrast this with Luke who was always wanting to get off Tatooine and had a loving supporting family that was around. Luke was driven by a need to help others (following Leia's message) where as Rey, whilst having such virtuous qualities, was more of a reluctant hero.

    Vadar and Kylo Ren have some similarities but their characters are mostly different. Vadar knew who he was and only questioned his position when faced with the death of his son. Ren on the other hand is deeply conflicted and ultimately took the path Vadar could not, he killed his father! Ren is deeply troubled by the light he feels inside and is clearly insecure and not in command of his powers to the extent Vadar was. Ren's background and upbringing are similar to Vadar (both were Jedi and seduced but isn't this generally how most Sith are arising at the time?).

    There was no character like Finn in the original trilogy. Rey is like a mash up of Luke and Han. Even BB's personality was clearly different from that of R2. R2 always seems to know what he needs to do. BB seemed unsure of himself but always wanting to do the right thing.

    The overall story line in a nutshell sounds like A New Hope, but once you flesh it out the similarities are nothing more than nods to the original. I'm not going to dissect the story line but I would still say the script is original.
    I'm not in any disagreement with you on the take on the new characters, all three are fresh and new in my opinion which was one of the main highlights for me, I enjoyed the actors portrayals and the chemistry between them, they were unique (in respect of Star Wars) and I found myself intrigued and connected, I want to know more about them, my comparison relates specifically to the structure of events and settings within the general storyline, I think it is a hard argument to say it is completely original when we can link so many comparative attributes with A New Hope. But again I'm not really bothered about it cause it was very enjoyable, I'm a fan of it, there is little criticism from me (to be honest my only personal criticism is having the starkiller aka super mega force Death Star shoot lasers to blow up planets, I think leaving it at sucking the energy out of suns would have been enough, killing the sun dooms the system and planets in it, which that alone would make it a much greater threat then the original Death Star, and they could of just stated they utilise the energy harvested to power the enormous starkiller, you know sort of like Unicron in a way, I think that would have been enough and kept it a little bit more original in a way).

    Ultimately what I was stating wasn't meant to be a criticism, just something that I thought was pretty obvious (which again I don't personally have any issues with it because I thought it was a. Awesome adventure in the end, I'm a fan )
    Last edited by Meister; 18th December 2015 at 01:33 PM.
    My wife asked me why I carry a gun?, I said "Decepticons"... She laughed, I laughed, the toaster laughed, I shot the toaster. It was a good day.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    18th Jun 2012
    Location
    St Clair
    Posts
    1,982

    Default

    Saw it, loved it, going tonight to see again

    While yes as a general idea a lot was borrowed from the original trilogy but hey who cares as that was the Holy Trilogy and if it aint broke...

    Thought the character development was great and also casting. and unlike the prequels the CGI did not take away from any scene

    Thank you JJ, bloody good job !

  3. #33
    Join Date
    27th Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,360

    Default

    To add to the missnamed kid dilemma... Han and Leias EU Youngest, Anakin, was a mechanical genius just like his grandfather....

    So maybe it's still Uncle Luke.... Maybe Han never knew he had a daughter... no telling how long he's been AWOL

  4. #34
    Join Date
    19th Mar 2015
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krayt View Post
    To add to the missnamed kid dilemma... Han and Leias EU Youngest, Anakin, was a mechanical genius just like his grandfather....

    So maybe it's still Uncle Luke.... Maybe Han never knew he had a daughter... no telling how long he's been AWOL
    I think this is the most likely and safest option, this way we don't have to worry about a partner for Luke, it provides an explanation why she would be hidden seeing what eventuated with Kylo and we also keep the saga within the family circle, this time pitting brother against sister. The safest way to go forward In order to keep the story focused on the central characters the way the OT did without too much deviations into other areas
    My wife asked me why I carry a gun?, I said "Decepticons"... She laughed, I laughed, the toaster laughed, I shot the toaster. It was a good day.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    29th Oct 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,024

    Default

    Did anyone else see it at IMAX? The one at Darling Harbour was horrendous! It was grainy, low-res and overly dark, almost like a TN display viewed from an angle.

    As for the movie.... yeah, it was pretty craptacular! Nowhere near as bad as the prequels at least...

    I've no problems with them killing off Solo, but with Harrison Ford gone, they need someone with high charisma, because none of the new blood exhibited any! The guy playing Finn has potential though.

    And what was up with Leia's mouth? The botox is strong with this one...

  6. #36
    Join Date
    8th Nov 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    I loved it that much, I'm going to go again, but in gold class this time. Wow, so blown away but so much to take in.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    16th Mar 2015
    Location
    Young
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEEEGGGAAATTTRRROOONNN!!! View Post
    Did anyone else see it at IMAX? The one at Darling Harbour was horrendous! It was grainy, low-res and overly dark, almost like a TN display viewed from an angle.

    As for the movie.... yeah, it was pretty craptacular! Nowhere near as bad as the prequels at least...

    I've no problems with them killing off Solo, but with Harrison Ford gone, they need someone with high charisma, because none of the new blood exhibited any! The guy playing Finn has potential though.

    And what was up with Leia's mouth? The botox is strong with this one...
    So did you like it or not? I'm kinda getting mixed messages...
    "Save the rebellion! Save the dream!" - Saw Gerrera


  8. #38
    Join Date
    3rd Sep 2014
    Location
    North-west Sydney
    Posts
    2,029

    Default

    How is it that the Death Star thingy can destroy 5 planets without charge, but when they have to destroy the last planet they need to suck the sun so it can charge?
    I'll update this when I'm needing help finding particular figures

  9. #39
    Join Date
    8th Nov 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Handsprime View Post
    How is it that the Death Star thingy can destroy 5 planets without charge, but when they have to destroy the last planet they need to suck the sun so it can charge?
    It was already charged prior and needed to recharge.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    6th Jul 2015
    Location
    Blaxland
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by philby View Post
    i loved it but come on young person leaves desert planet trying to get droid containing important information to freedom fighters so they can find a way to destroy super weapon in last ditch effort as time counts down to their destruction. along the way they discover the force and their mentor, whom they only just met, is killed. which movie am i describing?
    But the information the droid has doesn't tell them how to destroy the Starkiller base.......

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •