
Originally Posted by
Starscream77
Now again I am far from a Sharks fan but I find it a bit hypocritical of you continually slamming Sharks for drug cheats when the Knights have had plenty of dealings with this.
Andrew Johns has admitted taking illegal drugs during his playing career so I guess we say 2001 win is drugs tainted by your standard?
Not to mention you had a player put in jail for dealing bloody drugs!!!
As he should have. I make no excuses for any drug cheats, not even the "immortal" Andrew Johns. I'm no fan of his even though his drug taking was not systematic or performance enhancing. Plenty of other players fit that bill as well.
I suppose you don't find it hypocritical that Gallen and a number of other players who went on to play at other clubs plead guilty and took their nothing of a punishment but then Gallen still has the cheek to say he wasn't a cheat and that Flanagan claims he had no idea what Dank was doing yet former sharks players are suing the club for the whole systematic banned substance drug program they were put through.
The whole problem with this is that a gallen and co get to keep their records and stats with no little asterisk on them indicating that they played at least a season juiced but then you have Sandor Earl who was the whole face and whipping boy for the campaign whose career was ruined. Why is it one rule for one and another for others? Why does one player get stamped "never to play again" and another touted as a future immortal for feats performed while peptides pumped through his body?
Looking For: Wreckers Saga TPB Collection (with Requiem)