Last edited by griffin; 2nd August 2016 at 09:57 PM. Reason: hotlinked image
Yeah, but that has significantly large winglets which appear to be acting as vertical stabilisers. In fact...
"Winglets served double duty on Burt Rutan's canard pusher configuration VariEze and Long-EZ, acting as both a wingtip device and a vertical stabilizer. Several other derivatives of these and other similar aircraft use this design element." (source)
But I don't know if such proportionately small winglets on Dirge's wings could effectively double as vertical stabilisers.
Last edited by griffin; 2nd August 2016 at 09:57 PM. Reason: editted quote
Dirge's ult mode will fly, it might not be a very efficient design on a fighter jet per se but it will work.
Stabilisers are preferred on delta wings over larger winglets which is another reason you dont see dirges being built.
But the B2 Stealth Bomber has neither and still flies fine, so thats one example.
Anyway, were going a wee off track from what is the MP release of a toy with fictionally modified wing design on an F-15 body.
www.mariokart64.com
--------------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes, the wrong thing feels so right"
--------------------------------------------------------
Good lord, I can't believe we're debating the flyability of Dirge.
But it we must, look at Thrust's wings. Is there a real world equivalent/similarity?
<nerdy.snort.laff> BD
I did mention before that Thrust probably wouldn't fly either. None of the 2nd Year Jets look like they can fly, or if they can, not very well. But yeah, these are fictitiously modified F15s, and hey, if something as ridiculously shaped as Cosmos can fly in Earth's atmosphere, why not these jets? Besides, we all know the real reason as to why they can all actually fly...
In any case, none of this reflects on the MP toy which is merely being accurate to its source material.
Alt mode is nice but im just not feeling the robot mode.
I'd buy all 3 and display in alt mode if money is not object.