Page 13 of 17 FirstFirst ... 38910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 164

Thread: Discussion of Collection counting methods

  1. #121
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,303

    Default

    PWN!!!!

    George
    www.mariokart64.com
    --------------------------------------------------------
    "Sometimes, the wrong thing feels so right"
    --------------------------------------------------------

  2. #122
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by STL View Post
    Geez, you take it really personally there. "Infiltrating"?
    As in, whether or not any would end up in my collection (:

    Quote Originally Posted by STL View Post
    By definition then, all Transformer products are Transformers. They carry the name, they are identified as such. Hasbro would regard a Robot Replica or Robot Heroes as a Transformer, albeit a non-transforming one.
    Yeah, this is true for a large extent (some things would fall outside the definition, still, but a lot would be included). The reason the fandom - generally - includes AMs is because they were specifically included by Hasbro. As I said, a lot of fans aren't necessarily happy with the inclusion.

    Quote Originally Posted by STL View Post
    I cannot imagine that Hasbro meant to market them as anything as other than Transformers.
    Actually, I doubt Hasbro really care about marketing items such as (for example) a HOC as a Transformer or not - they just want the brand name to help selling the toy. It's this lack of definition which causes fans to differ on whether or not to count them. The crap thing is that there _is_ no right answer. As you say, troublesome.

    Quote Originally Posted by STL View Post
    To blindly contend that the black letter of the law is exactly what Hasbro states is mindboggling and unfortunate.
    Well, in the case of Actionmasters or Animorphs (I hate to admit it, in the latter case) it removes the ambivalence attached to so many other items. Which is why the general concensus is to count such items.

    I personally don't consider Animorphs as TFs, but then I don't have any, which allows me to reconcile my own opinion with Hasbro's marketing decision. It's simply a moot point in my case. And I'm happy about that

    By the same token, I have no problem with you purchasing Krok while not considering him a proper TF, within your own collection. So long as you'd accept that the majority of fans _would_ count him in theirs.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  3. #123
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Batemans Bay
    Posts
    2,304

    Default

    rectum is hardly a profanity anyway and not offensive in the least, i dont think any parent's, being that i am one would rather see that my child was only looking at some geeky forums with people using a counting system named after body parts, then looking at porn sites or any other kind appalling kind of site that can be easily found at the click of a button.

    I can just imagine it some 10 year old reading this forum and he(she) gets the part about r.e.c.t.u.m and the parents walk in and see it on the screen and go OMG look at the filth he is reading and rip telephone cable out of the wall and ban him form the internet in disgust as they cant believe the filth he is looking at.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,460

    Default

    The_Damned - I would tend to agree with you that most parents wouldn't have an issue. Rectum _is_ an anatonomical term. But there are some frighteningly conservative views out there.

    I don't think it's quite enough for any moderator action, mind you. The odds of someone taking serious offence are very low, and the concepts Jay is discussing are not obscene.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  5. #125
    TheDirtyDigger Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roller View Post
    what does fallacious mean?
    False, deceptive or misleading.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,599

    Default

    thanks dad

  7. #127
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Ulladulla
    Posts
    5,294

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roller View Post
    thanks dad
    Creepy.

    Anyway folks does it really matter what counting method we use? In all seriousness it's not like I'm going to do to The_Damned's house look at his collection and say "You said you had 510 transformers but according to UCM you only have 505 you lying bastard! I never want to see you again!"

    From what I've seen in the past, surveys like the UCM survey only create friction amongst friendship as some more competitive collector might get upset that someone claims they have more transformers then them due to mis interpretation of a definition. (Typing that made me feel smart)

    I consider us all friends in this little close knit community. It would be a shame if the thing that united us is the thing that divides us.

    In conclusion why don't we all just use the honour system. If The_Damned tells me he has 510 (or whatever the actual ammount is) Transformers I'm not going to sit there and examine ever figure and to prove him wrong. I'm going to believe him because he is my friend and I trust him.

  8. #128
    TheDirtyDigger Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bartrim View Post
    Creepy.
    In conclusion why don't we all just use the honour system. If The_Damned tells me he has 510 (or whatever the actual ammount is) Transformers I'm not going to sit there and examine ever figure and to prove him wrong. I'm going to believe him because he is my friend and I trust him.

    Well spoken Bart Rim.

    This will help me push my count just over the_doctor's 4752 Tfs as well!

  9. #129
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    In conclusion why don't we all just use the honour system. If The_Damned tells me he has 510 (or whatever the actual ammount is) Transformers I'm not going to sit there and examine ever figure and to prove him wrong. I'm going to believe him because he is my friend and I trust him.
    I am in agreement although at the end of the day, anyone comparing/submiting collection counts is already using an honor system of sorts as there is no one to verify if he did indeed use the UCM or if he is just submitting an estimate or random number.

    To be honest, I doubt more than a few people would use the UCM to count their collection as its too cumbersome to use. Typically a fan would just sit down and start a head count on what he considers to be part of his collection and then submit the number.

    However as mentioned several times on this thread, the UCM was created to serve not to dictate. So if I were really serious about comparing collection sizes in a uniform and accurate manner with a fellow fan, the UCM is available to me as a counting guideline which is what its meant to be.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    2nd Jan 2008
    Location
    NSW (southwest metro)
    Posts
    3,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bartrim View Post
    Anyway folks does it really matter what counting method we use? In all seriousness it's not like I'm going to do to The_Damned's house look at his collection and say "You said you had 510 transformers but according to UCM you only have 505 you lying bastard! I never want to see you again!"

    From what I've seen in the past, surveys like the UCM survey only create friction amongst friendship as some more competitive collector might get upset that someone claims they have more transformers then them due to mis interpretation of a definition. (Typing that made me feel smart)

    I consider us all friends in this little close knit community. It would be a shame if the thing that united us is the thing that divides us.

    In conclusion why don't we all just use the honour system. If The_Damned tells me he has 510 (or whatever the actual ammount is) Transformers I'm not going to sit there and examine ever figure and to prove him wrong. I'm going to believe him because he is my friend and I trust him.
    well said!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •