View Poll Results: Worth buying?

Voters
8. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    6 75.00%
  • Maybe if...

    0 0%
  • No

    0 0%
  • Not interested

    2 25.00%
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Toy review - Studio Series 56 Shockwave

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    10th Mar 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,378

    Default

    Robot mode looks just gorgeous in every aspect of sculpt and deco. However, transformation is pretty simple and the tank mode is pretty meh. He's essentially a Bayverse action master to me, but a really really nice one.
    Looking to buy lucky draw Armada Prime and Diaclone Marlboor Wheeljack.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    9th Apr 2008
    Location
    WEST AUST
    Posts
    5,077

    Default

    How well does it roll? I like the tank mode reminds me off starcraft or halo type computer game aliens.

    Robot mode is super

  3. #3
    Join Date
    19th May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Autocon View Post
    How well does it roll? I like the tank mode reminds me off starcraft or halo type computer game aliens.

    Robot mode is super
    Shockwave will roll, but not freely. It may take a bit of 'massaging' of the legs to get all four wheels to contact a surface without pressing on the figure, and then there is probably a millimetre of clearance from the surface from the backs of the thighs, particularly the top piece that comes from Megatron. I recommend straightening out the legs as much as possible to get that clearance. I've found that wheels rolling on tracked vehicles with little wheels set into them are a mixed bag - some will roll well, some won't.

    The upside of a simple transformation is that these sorts of requests don't take too long to prepare, because it only takes a minute or so to transform the figure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Japanicus Minimus
    Posts
    7,720

    Default

    I saw the images of this guy on the web and thought, oh yeah. But now looking at him, it's a definite oh no. Tanks mode loks awful, but as stated above, this is pointless. But for some reason, even the robot mode doesn't take my fancy.

    I think it comes solely down to personal preference of robot design. This shockwave is just 100% bay movie design to the max and I've come to the conclusion that I'm not that big a fan of that style. Personally I like to see bits of what the turn into in robot mode.

    Good review and I appreciate the pics, but this guy is not for me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Half a decade later...

    I got the 2025 reissue of this toy. AFAIK there are no noteable changes. Great looking robot mode and forgettable vehicle mode. The super soft and floppy weapons and the positioning of the hose in vehicle mode are the biggest let downs. Oddly enough, the "battle damage" on this toy doesn't bug me that much (but I don't find it appealing either).

    IMO the original Voyager is better value for money. While less screen-like, it doesn't have any rubbery parts (ex. hose), and the cannon arm can change, or you can have Shockwave with two hands.














  6. #6
    Join Date
    19th May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Half a decade later...

    I got the 2025 reissue of this toy. AFAIK there are no noteable changes. Great looking robot mode and forgettable vehicle mode. The super soft and floppy weapons and the positioning of the hose in vehicle mode are the biggest let downs. Oddly enough, the "battle damage" on this toy doesn't bug me that much (but I don't find it appealing either).
    Now I'm wondering if Hasbro have changed the formulation of their soft plastic, because my Shockwave's 'rubberised' parts were never soft to the point of being 'floppy.' The large arm blade certainly felt flimsy because it's hollow and its walls are very thin, but it kept its shape and didn't droop or sag. The cannon barrel and left hand felt solid enough, and the foot spikes weren't bent or saggy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •