View Poll Results: Worth buying?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    7 77.78%
  • Only if cheap

    0 0%
  • Only if something else (please specify)

    0 0%
  • No

    0 0%
  • Not even interested

    2 22.22%
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Toy Review - Studio Series Shatter (Jet Type)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    14th Jul 2014
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    857

    Default

    Yeah I read a thing that they did those winglet things to avoid any issues with not having the licence.
    To me a fast jet is a fast jet hahaahaha

    I must say I'm actually not a big fan of the red hands; while they're kinda accurate, it looks cheap bc they just melt into the red plastic of the arms.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimi194 View Post
    Yeah I read a thing that they did those winglet things to avoid any issues with not having the licence.
    That's what tfwiki reckons. <shrugs>
    Makes me wonder... have we had an accurate Harrier jet since 1993's G1.5 Deftwing? Movieverse Dirge is also just an approximation of a Harrier, although at least Shatter's Harrier mode is closer than Dirge's. I wonder if it's because TFs (especially since Bayformers) has primarily focused on US military aircraft from companies like Lockheed & Martin so they haven't bothered to maintain licence from non-American companies like Hawker Siddeley (UK) to fall by the wayside. <shrugs again> Your guess is as good as mine.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimi194 View Post
    I must say I'm actually not a big fan of the red hands; while they're kinda accurate, it looks cheap bc they just melt into the red plastic of the arms.
    See... this is exactly how I feel about blue eyes on Optimus Prime! (and why I went ahead and painted yellow eyes on my Earthrise OP)
    Still, I guess you can always paint the hands a different colour if you like. Adding paints is always easier than removing unwanted paint apps (e.g. "battle damage" on Siege toys )

  3. #3
    Join Date
    31st Jul 2008
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    1,296

    Default

    This is a great toy.

    My only one minor gripe is with the back-kibble...it never feels like it's ever quite in the 'right' place. And it's waaaaay oversided too, but I can't think of anyway they could get around that with how much the designs in the BB movie cheated their transformations.

    Now if they could please go back and give Heli-Dropkick another crack, this time in the right colours etc k thx.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sutton View Post
    This is a great toy.

    My only one minor gripe is with the back-kibble...it never feels like it's ever quite in the 'right' place. And it's waaaaay oversided too, but I can't think of anyway they could get around that with how much the designs in the Bumblebee movie cheated their transformations.
    Yeah, I do wish that the backpack had some way of tabbing or locking into position. I do agree that it is quite large (hence why I took the photo of the toy from behind to show this), but surprisingly it doesn't make the toy too back heavy. She still stands just fine without toppling over.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sutton View Post
    Now if they could please go back and give Heli-Dropkick another crack, this time in the right colours etc k thx.
    Replied here.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th May 2013
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    3,355

    Default

    Absolutely agree with the review. It is an amazing figure, I also highly recommend that if you don't have this, get one!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    23rd Jul 2015
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,493

    Default

    The way the plane comes together is amazing because it remains compact without parts popping out eventually or from the slightest touch. I wish the same thought had been put into the messy alt. mode of KSI Boss. In fact, if reducing him to deluxe size could solve the problem, I would support that based on what Shatter has shown me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    5th Feb 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shockNwave View Post
    The way the plane comes together is amazing because it remains compact without parts popping out eventually or from the slightest touch. I wish the same thought had been put into the messy alt. mode of KSI Boss. In fact, if reducing him to deluxe size could solve the problem, I would support that based on what Shatter has shown me.
    I second this. It's a great example of why more jet-formers need to make use of the fuselage for robot mode limb and torso mass, instead of having the folded up robot just hang off the bottom of a model jet.

    Bonus feature - it's actually (approximately) in scale with the much larger F-22 Raptor Studio Series Starscream figure in jet mode.
    I'm really just here for the free food and open bar.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •