Me too. So far.Originally Posted by Gok
Me too. So far.Originally Posted by Gok
Where did I say anon edits were rejected outright? Like most wikis (unless they're ones without a large number of regular contributors), anonymous edits are held in lower regard, and we'd prefer it if people went to the extra trouble of registering an account to edit. No anon users are forbidden from editing. I myself actually argued against forcing people to register when somebody from Wikia (when we were on their servers) suggested we do that.
Once again, we are not the wikipedia, and by majority consensus, we like our bias and our tone. If somebody attempts to remove it in the name of "neutral voice" or trying to make the wiki more like the Wikipedia, then it's vandalism.
http://www.tfwiki.net, the Transformers Wiki - Serious intellectual discussion about transforming space robots.
I'll take all the Wiki's bias happily if it means articles like Pat Lee and ruined forever exist in that style. Gold.
Going back to what dirge said before:
That pretty much sums up my conclusion on this matter.Originally Posted by dirge
I was reading shortpacked to maintain my sanity at work and came across this:
http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20060411.html
Heh... I wouldn't waste my time doing that. Like I said, I spent a bit of time trying to contribute to TFwiki but since it's clear that my contributions aren't welcome, I just don't bother.
He was also one of the head honchos of #wiijii... I have nothing terribly pleasant to say about that IRC channel so I'll just shut my big yap now.
I'm glad Willis can see a funny-side to Wiki's critics... (which proves the comments/feedback aren't all getting marked as spam )