Where did I say anon edits were rejected outright? Like most wikis (unless they're ones without a large number of regular contributors), anonymous edits are held in lower regard, and we'd prefer it if people went to the extra trouble of registering an account to edit. No anon users are forbidden from editing. I myself actually argued against forcing people to register when somebody from Wikia (when we were on their servers) suggested we do that.

Once again, we are not the wikipedia, and by majority consensus, we like our bias and our tone. If somebody attempts to remove it in the name of "neutral voice" or trying to make the wiki more like the Wikipedia, then it's vandalism.