Sent. awaiting response.
I actually suggested something like this to Kyle, except I used the Stormbringer comics to pitch my idea.
Yeah, the guy's name is Nate, AKA NATO-BOT.
Last edited by FFN; 21st November 2008 at 01:03 AM.
http://www.tfwiki.net, the Transformers Wiki - Serious intellectual discussion about transforming space robots.
Well if there is a toy desperately needing an upgrade to make the G1 tribute 'right' its this one.
Other than doing an all-new mold, the toy is probably the best mold one can use for Roadbuster given how many weapons it has and the potential for expandability. Also has a truckload of paint on it, too (wheels are cast in green, painted black. I suspect Universe Brawn has painted wheels as well).
http://www.tfwiki.net, the Transformers Wiki - Serious intellectual discussion about transforming space robots.
I understand that and its true. However the same thing could be said about Classics Cliffjumper - at the time, the mold was the best 'fit' for the character when it comes to a repaint.
However despite the 'best fit' for a repaint reasoning, neither Roadbuster nor Cliffjumper properly captured their supposed tributes. Cliffjumper looked like a red bumblebee and Roadbuster almost looks like a new character or Springer in camo when it comes to the robot mode.
The Cliffjumper set brought out the character and made it Cliffjumper instead of a friendly/happy looking Red Bumblebee.
I am sure that something similar can be done with Roadbuster and I hope the drawings are realized into an upgrade set avaliable to the public.
I don't think Universe Roadbuster is as bad as Classics Bumblebee in terms of being a messed up G1 homage, mostly because there's no ambiguity with the Cybertron Defence Hot Shot mould. In G1, both Bumblebee and Cliffjumper were available in red and yellow - so a red Bumblebee was still Bumblebee, not Cliffjumper! What also riled me was how they were willing to extensively retool Classics Starscream for Classics Ramjet, but they didn't even retool the head of Classics Bumblebee (which would've been a far less extensive retool) for Classics Cliffjumper - and both toys came out in the same wave.
With Roadbuster being a repaint of CD Hot Shot, it's not as if you're going to confuse him for being another G1 character - there's no real ambiguity there like you had withred BumblebeeCliffjumper. Secondly, he's released as part of a set which are all just repainted Cybertron toys anyway, unlike Cliffjumper who came in the same wave with Classics Ramjet. If they were going to retool Roadbuster, then I would expect them to retool Dirge, Ratbat and Springer too...
And I agree with dirge's sentiment - this kit seems to be reproducing the less desirable (re: crappy) element of the G1 Roadbuster toy! Since I was a kid I've always hated how Roadbuster came with a buttload of parts that you could easily lose! I much prefer Transformers that have self-contained parts, i.e.: parts that you don't need to detach and re-attach when transforming between modes. IMO I think Universe Roadbuster is a neat enough tribute to the G1 toy/character - he's bulky and heavily armoured, and the fact that the armour is non-removable is a good thing IMO!Okay, his face may not be very G1 accurate, but neither is Universe Ratbat. Springer is kinda close and of course Dirge is accurate for obvious reasons (I like how they gave Dirge a blue helmet which is accurate to the G1 toy
).
I can forgive Universe Roadbuster more than Classics Cliffjumper because this lot of Universe figures are all just Cybertron repaints, and in that regard Roadbuster isn't fundamentally better or worse than Ratbat, Dirge and Springer, unlike Cliffjumper who came out with Ramjet - clearly showing that Hasbro could/would retool one toy, but not the other. Gah.
I was informed by an inside source that a different head for Cliffjumper was actually discussed by the design team. Why they didn't go through with it though I forgot to ask about. In the end it was Hasbro's loss and the guys that made the CJ upgrade kit (and the guys that sold theirs for 1000% profit) gain.
As for this Roadbuster upgrade, I'm not too fussed on getting it as I mainly collect my Classics as an homage to the cartoon and not the toys.
If it's cheap enough I'll be all over it though.![]()
Roadbuster did appear in the comics (G1 and War Within) as part of the Wreckers. Universe Roadbuster's tech specs even mentions that he's a member of the Wreckers (nice)! Springer was the Wreckers' leader, but I haven't read Universe Springer's tech specs yet. Roadbuster is like Autobot Rambo.
"Wreck and slaggin' Rule!"
Hasbro would've profited too since you need to purchase the actual Classics Cliffjumper toy to attach the garage kit onto!Originally Posted by TheDirtyDigger
I disagree when it comes to Roadbuster. To me the face of the robot mode severely hurts the tribute and to me its not as obvious. Basically it feels like another character and not roadbuster.
When it comes to body, alt mode and colors, yes it is roadbuster but the face makes all that null the same as how it happened with Cliffjumper.
Most important, they are only proposing 2 extra accessories for the Roadbuster kit (drawn in different angles) and a face replacement for the head. It's no where near as bad as G1 Roadbuster.