Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 65

Thread: Animated not reflecting the style of the Movie?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roller View Post
    yeah, Armada trilogy copied G1 in the Unicron respect.

    Now, instead of trying to blow up a monster planet in every series, we'll be seeing both factions dukin it out for a box/cube

    Thats why RID rocks, so unique
    OMG I agree with roller, RID Rocks.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    19th Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydneytron
    Posts
    3,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SilverDragon View Post
    I prefer the difference in styles, since I dislike the Movie designs quite a bit.

    Also, it gives us greater variety to choose from. Movie toys for people who like 'real' robots, Animated for cartoony styles, and Universe for nostalgia.
    I'm the oppisite, I like the Movie designs and dislike the Animated ones for the most part, G1 is toony enough for me. I agree with you though that diversity is a good thing though. I recall when Armada was out it was a choice of unispiring TF's ore more uninspiring TF's!

    What Hasbro does with there toons doesn't really bother me as I haven't really got much from a TFcartoon since Beast Wars. Though I will agree with Roller to some exent Car Robots was amusing, in it's native tounge at least.

    Originaly posted by Loophole
    I personally dont mind the cartoony styling of Animated its different and i like cartoony looking stuff hell i have Daffy Duck tattood to my arm. btw i like cartoons.
    I like cartoons to, though toy cartoons get a bit sameish after a while. Daffy Duck rocks! I wrote and essay about Daffy Duck, Buggs Buny and the Transformers at Uni once, I really love the old Tex Avery cartoons where Daffy Duck is straight jacket insane! Although Chuck Jones's ones are awesome to.
    Last edited by Lord_Zed; 10th December 2008 at 08:43 PM.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    I really like how the movie made the Transformers so other-worldly. I can't think of any other TF continuity that's done that quite so well. Budiansky comes close, but the movie is better IMO.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    A little to the left... a little bit more...
    Posts
    3,962

    Default

    I really dislike the movie designs... and at first I wasn't so keen on the Animated ones - but now i love em! I'm also impressed by how they've managed to make cartoony toys that actually transform!

    Overall, I agree that Animated is a breath of fresh air!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    25th May 2008
    Location
    Mount Barker, South Australia
    Posts
    3,448

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Zed View Post
    I really love the old Tex Avery cartoons where Daffy Duck is straight jacket insane! Although Chuck Jones's ones are awesome to.
    Crazy insane Daffy is the best

    And on the point of this actual thread. I like the movie designs because of how different and how thats how they probally look like if they did come to Earth my biggest problem not so much with the movie cast but most of the movie toys there head mould/ designs just arent that appealing i know there alien robots but i still like to see eyes and mouth

  6. #36
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loophole
    I like the movie designs because of how different and how thats how they probally look like if they did come to Earth
    Not only that, but it's more like how Transformers would look if they were from an alien world and if they existed in real life. The reason why more traditional TF designs are unrealistic in real life compared to the movie designs would include:

    1/ Why would alien robots completely unrelated to humans happen to have unnecessary human-like features, such as a humanlike face with nose, mouth, teeth etc. - the movie Transformers have mouthes, but they don't look like human mouthes!
    2/ Traditional TF designs really restrict movement. Anyone who's ever done TF cosplay would know this. Animators and comic artists cheat by morphing and dislocating parts to do things like make TFs cross their arms. This would not work in a photorealistic setting, so designs had to be changed to make their bodies more streamlined.

  7. #37
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    I prefer the animated type of look (g1, unicron trilogy, etc). I like the look of them looking like they are dressed and not half naked with their alien robot parts showing and wearing high heels.
    Code:
    O o 
      _
     / --------------------------------
    |      IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!!
     \_--------------------------------

  8. #38
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Yeah but there's nothing to say that a non-Cartoon Networky TF series wouldn't be marketable...
    This is why youre not in the industry, Gok. Theres much more to it than the fans point of view.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    1/ Why would alien robots completely unrelated to humans happen to have unnecessary human-like features, such as a humanlike face with nose, mouth, teeth etc. - the movie Transformers have mouthes, but they don't look like human mouthes!
    Like accents in their voices? Agreed with the rest tho.. still ugly..

  10. #40
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by springah
    This is why youre not in the industry, Gok. Theres much more to it than the fans point of view.
    When I spoke to Eric Siebernaler about this issue he did concede that the style of Animated is "divergent" (that's the word he used) from the standard/orthodox style of Transformers. He said that Hasbro initially wanted Animated to completely unrelated to the movie but others thought that Transformers should incorporate elements of the movie. That faction won a slight victory toward the end of the conceptual development stage when they were able to introduce the AllSpark into the story - something that's obviously from the movie. But Animated is largely not influenced by the movie because it was Hasbro's initial decision for it to be so. Eric didn't say that basing the follow-up cartoon on the movie would be a bad idea per se, but merely that it simply wasn't Hasbro's decision.

    Quote Originally Posted by springah
    Like accents in their voices?
    They learned Earth's languages through the internet. I'm grateful they're not talking in 13375p34|<! Seriously though, when acquiring a language of course they're going to have an accent - it's impossible to speak a language without an accent. As machines they would be able to acquire languages quickly without having an alien accent as would happen with organic aliens (e.g. Yoda).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •