Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: The First Ever Transformers Review. (Hilarious, but real.)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Jan 2008
    Location
    La Face Cachée de la Lune
    Posts
    6,821

    Default The First Ever Transformers Review. (Hilarious, but real.)

    The following is almost certainly the first-ever review of anything from the world of Transformers (from May 1984.) For anyone who hasn't read it before, it's definitely worth a look from a cultural and historic perspective (or merely for amusement.)

    Original link: http://groups.google.com/group/net.c...e=source&hl=en

    "My vote for worst comic of the year would have to go to Marvel's
    TRANSFORMERS #1. Has anyone out there seen it? I'm still trying
    to figure out why I wanted to spend $.75 on it in the first place,
    but any reason I may have had was inadequate.

    The premise is that two groups of 'robots' evolve on a faraway planet
    and start an eons long war for control of same. This knocks the planet
    from its orbit and sends it spinning through our solar system (!)
    The goodguy robots send an expedition out to punch a path through the
    asteroid belt, where they are ambushed by the badguy robots and all end up
    crashing into Earth and being suspended for ages in a volcano. Then they
    wake up and start the battle again.

    I had thought I had seen bad comic writing at its peak during Marv Wolfman's
    tenure on MACHINE MAN (MM 10-13 in particular are classically bad comics
    and can be savored as such), but I think Ralph Macchio has topped even this.
    The following is typical :

    "--The AUTOBOTS. Whereas life elsewhere in the cosmos usually evolved
    through carbon-bonding, here it was the interaction of naturally
    occurring gears levers and pulleys that miraculously brought forth
    sentient beings."

    In addition, both sides go through incredibly bad sequences to establish
    the identity of each robot in the worst 'of course you know..' manner,
    and there are gaping holes in even elementary plot logic.

    First has been accusing Marvel of what ammounts to dumping. I cannot
    think of any other reason for this comic to exist,and admit to being
    mystified about its intended audience (esp given the price).

    On a more pleasant note, many thanks to y'all out there for
    plugging Swamp Thing and Summerset (sp?) Holmes. I am enjoying them.

    Clear Ether
    Ted Nolan"

    (P.S. This is Sky Shadow again. With comics now at $3.99 I'm most amused by the fact that the reviewer was disgusted by the 75c pricetag!)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,659

    Default

    US#1 is a pretty ordinary issue with horrific artwork (although it was toy-accurate! The UK comics gave us better toy-accurate art though). It's only worth collecting/reading purely from a G1 collector's POV but it's otherwise by no means the high point of the G1 comic run. Having said that, the G1 comics were pretty successful. Originally slated to be just a four issue limited series it spanned for 80 issues in the US run - something Marvel pointed out with the caption on the top of US#80's front cover.

    #1 in a Four Issue Limited Series

    #80 in a Four Issue Limited Series

    Toy-accurate art (US)--><--Toy-accurate art (UK)

    The premise is that two groups of 'robots' evolve on a faraway planet
    and start an eons long war for control of same. This knocks the planet
    from its orbit and sends it spinning through our solar system (!)
    The goodguy robots send an expedition out to punch a path through the
    asteroid belt, where they are ambushed by the badguy robots and all end up
    crashing into Earth and being suspended for ages in a volcano. Then they
    wake up and start the battle again.
    Yeah, I've never been a huge fan of an orbitless Cybertron in the comics. :/ I prefer the G1 cartoon's premise of Cybertron being depleted of energy and thus prompting the Autobots to leave Cybertron in search for more fuel.

    "--The AUTOBOTS. Whereas life elsewhere in the cosmos usually evolved
    through carbon-bonding, here it was the interaction of naturally
    occurring gears levers and pulleys that miraculously brought forth
    sentient beings."
    Thankfully that's since been retconned by Simon Furman. Primus FTW!

    In addition, both sides go through incredibly bad sequences to establish
    the identity of each robot in the worst 'of course you know..' manner,
    and there are gaping holes in even elementary plot logic.
    Heh... that's true. They basically had to introduce the entire 1984 toy line in a single issue. I suspect that was under direction from Hasbro. The Rebirth Part 1 also suffered from the same thing.

    First has been accusing Marvel of what ammounts to dumping. I cannot
    think of any other reason for this comic to exist,and admit to being
    mystified about its intended audience (esp given the price).
    ...and by the end of that year the Transformers had become the highest grossing debut toy line in history.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky Shadow
    (P.S. This is Sky Shadow again. With comics now at $3.99 I'm most amused by the fact that the reviewer was disgusted by the 75c pricetag!)
    Compare 75c in 1984 with $3.99 in 2008 though... anyone know how much petrol was per litre in 1984?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    27th Jan 2008
    Location
    La Face Cachée de la Lune
    Posts
    6,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Compare 75c in 1984 with $3.99 in 2008 though... anyone know how much petrol was per litre in 1984?
    Rich Johnson (or one of his lackeys) did the maths - from an inflation-since-1977 POV, at most comics should be around $1.50 by now:

    http://www.comicbookresources.com/?p...ticle&id=18583

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,659

    Default

    I remember paying $1.70 for G1 comics around 1990/1. Hrmmm... I do agree that comic book are horrendously overpriced here.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,772

    Default

    Transformers was more expensive than the average Marvel comic at the same time (not by much though).
    Last edited by Paulbot; 9th December 2008 at 09:57 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th Jan 2008
    Location
    La Face Cachée de la Lune
    Posts
    6,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    Transformers was more expensive than the average Marvel comic at the same time.
    Yes... by a whopping fifteen US cents!

  7. #7
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Compare 75c in 1984 with $3.99 in 2008 though... anyone know how much petrol was per litre in 1984?
    About 25cpl.
    Code:
    O o 
      _
     / --------------------------------
    |      IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!!
     \_--------------------------------

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •