-
28th December 2008, 11:53 PM
#21
Originally Posted by
Golden Phoenix
+1
Not me. I don't see the point of FABs at all. They're the exact same price point as Movie toys and they're supposedly easier to transform. From my limited experience, they feel like knocks and are severely simple. I'd much prefer Slammers b/c there's a target audience there - younger kids who aren't necessarily going to be able to transform a Deluxe or Scout. FABs are an inferior alternative and I can't see parents distinguishing the difference between the two lines very well at all. At least not in Australia. Many a parent I chatted with in the TF aisles the previous years just wanted a Prime or BB, didn't matter what it was: robot replica, deluxe or FAB. So for me, I'd much prefer more higher quality toys on the market than an FAB I shudder everytime I pass.
Collection Count (w/ a 12.42% upsize): 3053
New Family Members: DA-15 Jetwing Prime, DOTM Leader Ironhide, Perfect Effect Reflector, DOTM Shockwave & Skyhammer, eHobby United 3-packs
Current Desires: Japanese BW Optimal Optimus
The Holy Grail: Ultmetal Optimus Prime
-
29th December 2008, 12:19 AM
#22
I'd just rather something that actually Transforms over the Cyberslammers "pop up from the roof" thing.
Sure the FAB weren't that great toys, but they were pretty much the beta activators.
If they bring the Activators standard to the 2nd movie toys then they would be find
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules