Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: My Theory **Big bad possible spoilerness** Comparing Comic, Novel and TOy info...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,360

    Default My Theory **Big bad possible spoilerness** Comparing Comic, Novel and TOy info...

    You have been warned...


    SPOILERNESS

    but not official.... just my mind working it over....




    don't keep reading



    unless you want too....

    and you know you do....











    OK!!!!



    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    ......


    So, Hasbro has said "There is a reason for Scavenger and Demolishor having seperate names"

    One is seen in shanghi, one in Egypt.... one fighting Prime and you KNOW he has massive swords for a reason....

    So maybe they are 2 seperate characters....

    This is supported by the toys... Demolishor DOES NOT form part of devestator... everyone is complainging about combiner characters not combining... but if one never leaves China, he isn't one of the combiners...

    THis is supported by Mr Deluxe Rampage.... Who in the Comic, as i have seen from the Issue 4 five page preview, shows up holding Mummy and Daddy Witwicky hostage....

    So?

    Well in the comic, which timing can often suck in, but also the Novel (a bloody good read) this is happening AT THE SAME TIME that Big Devs starts ripping into the Pyramid...

    So we think Hasbro's being cheap making Constructicons that don't combine.... But maybe, just maybe, they are making exactly what will be in the movie, a Bulldozer to robot Toy, and a Bulldozer to leg one...

    That's my theory.... lets see what happens on the 24th....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,840

    Default

    I agree.

    After the five minutes of the film I saw at Botcon I had a different speculation, but it's maybe a bit more spoilery since it's based on seeing some of the film (albeit it out of context). Generally though it's in the same line of thought as yours.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    12th Feb 2009
    Location
    Shellharbour
    Posts
    563

    Default

    I have always thought that Demolisher and Scavenger were seperate characters. When the first pics were shown of the toys they looked similar but small differences made me think that they weren't the same bot. Differences such as the cabin and treads. Although, Demolisher may get an upgrade/downgrade later in the fillm to become Scavenger. Or vica versa.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,840

    Default

    So, now that people have the seen the film, will you all stop complaining that the Supreme Devastator toy is just vehicles that combine into a giant robot? Complain instead that the box calls some of the vehicles Rampage, Mixmaster, and Long Haul when we all saw that they are not part of Devastator, or that the seventh vehicle, the long tuck, is not included. .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    So, now that people have the seen the film, will you all stop complaining that the Supreme Devastator toy is just vehicles that combine into a giant robot? Complain instead that the box calls some of the vehicles Rampage, Mixmaster, and Long Haul when we all saw that they are not part of Devastator, or that the seventh vehicle, the long tuck, is not included. .
    Couldn't agree more!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •