Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: The Soapbox XIII: Necessary Evils

  1. #1
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,150

    Default The Soapbox XIII: Necessary Evils

    The Soapbox XIII: Necessary Evils


    It's our 25th anniversary and what better way to mark it than with the ultimate big screen blockbuster that would shatter record after record. Revenge of the Fallen (ROTF) has been an unqualified success. In terms of sales, that is. But there is much doubt that hovers over the success of ROTF in other terms, more specifically to us, the fandom. Is the success a credible one that adds to the tapestry or is it a cringeworthy one that would be better left forgotten in the depths of Unicron's bowels? That's the question this Soapbox seeks to answer.

    Let's start from base one. Michael Bay. One should generally be able to surmise by whoever is at the helm of the directorship of a flick as to what the flavour of the movie is. Did anyone really expect much more than that from the outset? Did anybody really think for the moment that this was going to be a Star Trek or Star Wars shattering, universe building movie? Given his track record, you'd have been rather naive to expect otherwise. So from this point of view, if you approach the movie with expectations of what type of movie this will be given the director, ROTF definitely isn't a great departure from those expectations. It's a rather soulless flick with lots of explosions and some attempt at humour. In that sense, it achieves what it set out to do and can be hardly considered a failure..To level accusations that it failed because it was an unintelligent, soulless and lame movie are completely unfair. One doesn't cross a dog and expect it to meow.

    Sneaking our way towards base two. The more difficult part. While we can all agree the movie isn't very meaningful, the question is does it add to the mythos? Is it a success in that sense? Why's this important? B/c what you often find with successful franchises is that people hold onto those little nuances that are additions to a mythos and take it in directions for years to come, opening new possibilities and conjecture. In this regard, I think ROTF has succeeded or in many ways exceeded our expectations. The concept of a combiner has been turned on its head with the ROTF Devastator. The discussions and the paradigm that a combiner must be individual robots has all been but turned on its head. ROTF Devastator is a giant who is a combination of a whole lot of vehicles that form one sentient being. In turn this raises questions as to sentience though. Do each of the vehicles have a sentience of their own? Or is it collective? And how does that play out? Is it slowly to react as a whole? Can it choose as it pleases the vehicles that it's a combination? Moving past the combiner concept. The Matrix. The 13. The Seekers. The explorers who sought out different worlds. Can TFs be grown from little cocoons as Starscream did? TF history. How long have the TFs been on Earth? Who else is out there? The Matrix's own sentience. Twins. Sacrificing of sparks. Many of the events in ROTF put those elements of TF on show, raising questions and opening new dimensions simultaneously. Certainly, the story doesn't bring it together effectively but one cannot deny those elements and layers being added to the TF mythos and that's certainly a win for us.

    At third base, we've got a larger complication. It's a movie about TFs but you'd be hard pressed to not think it was about the military and how oh so glorious and coordinated they are. Not to mention their state-of-the-art technology that's armed with absolute precision. You know, across 2 movies how much more do we really know about the TFs? How much layers have they added to the characters? As sad as it is, not very damn much.

    Autobots
    Optimus - okay, that's a win
    Bumblebee - not much really, other than that his attachment to the boy's a bit worrying when he bursts into tears
    Ironhide - okay, pretty G1. Hard, grumpy and uncompromising but completely tied to the cause. Nice.
    Ratchet - team medic, bit of a sense of humour
    Jazz - stereotype galore, then he got maimed
    Sideswipe - my personality oozes from 1 line; but i'm as cool and bad@$$as i look
    Jolt - WTF? and "W" stands for who in case ur wondering. Geez, I described him with more words than he uttered in the movie
    Mudflap - stereotype galore
    Skids - stereotype galore
    Jetfire - awesome but still rather generic

    Decepticons
    Megatron - a fair bit actually though it really sucks to see him all of a sudden willing to be second in command
    Starscream - okay that's a win
    Barricade - dunno, cool cop car though
    Brawl - zilch
    Blackout - more zilch
    Sideways - if you call running and then getting sliced in half "personality", sure
    Alice - hot... oh wait, we're talking personality and character here
    Rampage - nada
    Ravage - silent brooding type, generic, G1 esque though
    Soundwave - hey i sit up here and broadcast all day
    Scapel - borderline fail, he's got a lot more lines than most of his counterparts tho
    Demolisher - more nada
    Mixmaster - even more nada
    The Fallen - generic i wanna take over the world bad guy
    Long Haul - why am I even bothering?

    It's pretty damn inexcusable to be honest. The core characters to a movie yet there's so little of their character. That's an unqualified fail if I've ever seen one. Sure, it might be a soulless Michael Bay movie but surely at some affording some of your characters with a bit of personality and lines couldn't have hurt. Really why is that Mark Ryan guy even needed to do Bumblebee's voice. He never even says a word.

    Heading onto the home straight now, it certainly appears ROTF was not a success from the point of view of the fandom. It's addition to the mythos aisde, it doesn't offer too much. But that's a fairly tunnelled view of things. While sales success, look at box office receipts, merchandise and toy sales, isn't always a gage there's one very significant factor we cannot overlook. Longevity.

    The longevity of TFs is critical to its success as a franchise. What ROTF does is make Transformers big. It makes the brand big. It keeps in the minds of a generation. Much like you still see Matrix or Pirates of the Carribean still on the shelves, it will keep TFs on the shelves. Those who don't even become fans will grow into parents and what they'll still remember the movie, recognise the brand. That will certainly influence the toys they purchase for their kids. And this, my friends, is where we win. By securing the longevity and strength of the brand that gives Hasbro/Takara the ability to keep developing TFs. More specifically b/c of the strength of the brand they'll be able to offer us the fans more. They'll be in a better position to talk with car makers for brands like alternity or Human Alliance. They'll have a stronger market and therefore a bigger budget available for R&D. They are able to do that with confidence b/c they have a blockbuster movie that blew the pants off of ever other movie in the cinemas and were unprecedented successes in the space of 3 years. ROTF helps and contributes to that and that is not a contribution that we can ignore.

    Certainly, it's easy to lose sight of this massive contribution that ROTF makes given the lame characterisation and the subpar quality of the movie. Many of those failures are cringeworthy and ROTF will never be the same as G1 or Beast Wars or heck even Animated, but it's place and contribution we can never understate. In the long-term for the next 10-15 years, we have a strong brand. The cost of that is that to make it mainstream to the public of both genders, a lot of the integrity of TFs was compromised. That we got a soulless creature. That we had some awful stereotypes. That we had lots of humans who were more important that the TFs that the movie was supposed to be about.

    And that is why as sad as it is, ROTF is the necessary evil that we had to have.


    The Soapbox Archive
    The Soapbox I: TFM or TFTM?
    The Soapbox II: The Problem with Jets
    The Soapbox III: Price-Matching
    The Soapbox IV: The Top 10 Characters of All-Time
    The Soapbox V: What makes a good Transformers?
    The Soapbox VI: Don't like gimmicks? Start dealing with it.
    The Soapbox VII: The Top 10 Transformers toys of 2008
    The Soapbox VIII: 2008: A Year in Review
    The Soapbox IX: Budgeting Basics
    The Soapbox X: A Prime Problem
    The Soapbox XI: Battle of the City-Formers
    The Soapbox XII: The Convenient Truth
    Collection Count (w/ a 12.42% upsize): 3053
    New Family Members: DA-15 Jetwing Prime, DOTM Leader Ironhide, Perfect Effect Reflector, DOTM Shockwave & Skyhammer, eHobby United 3-packs
    Current Desires: Japanese BW Optimal Optimus
    The Holy Grail: Ultmetal Optimus Prime


    Visit the Wonderful World of: The Iacon City Hub-Capital Collection

  2. #2
    Join Date
    7th Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,982

    Default

    It was a crap movie but I liked it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    16th Jul 2008
    Location
    Melb
    Posts
    3,974

    Default

    I would argue that it is not a necessary evil on two points

    -the transformers brand would have had adequate longevity for the next 10-15 years without any feature films, let alone the ones we received. Sure sales might not have been as supreme but the toyline/cartoon formula has never gone wrong.

    -ROTF (and the first movie) could have been so much more, an awesome angel instead of a necessary evil.

    That said, i don't think ROTF has wounded the mighty TF franchise at all. Plenty of popular fictional characters have suffered more-atrocious-than-ROTF feature films adaptations in the past without any real detriment to their existing popularity or overall longevity. I think in this and many other cases, film adaptations are dependent on the existing longevity/recognizability of a brand rather than the other way around.

    All this coming from someone who hasn't even seen ROTF yet

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Jan 2008
    Location
    La Face Cachée de la Lune
    Posts
    6,821

    Default

    I can't remember who I was talking to at the Parra fair, but someone mentioned that ROTF was officially the most critically panned film to ever make as much money as it has. That is, no movie has made as much money ($826,889,137) with such bad reviews (about a two-star average, I think.) I don't know where that idea originated, but I think they're great statistics if they're accurate.

    As a Transformers franchise, the 200X movies save me a lot of money. I don't buy a year's worth of toys, DVDs, merchandise, comics - heck, for ROTF I didn't even have to pay to see the film or for my popcorn or drink. The entire movie universe is a triviality to me - unlike Beast Wars or Generation 2 it's not a part of the G1 universe I love (basically the Marvel Comics and Anglophile toy Tech Specs profiles), and unlike Animated or Masterforce or Shattered Glass it's not even an 'alternate' universe in which I enjoy the stories. I don't appreciate the aesthetics or the laborious transformations and have-bits-fall-off-in-your-hands nature of the toys. No sir, I don't like it.

    For me, ROTF is not even an evil, let alone a necessary one. I think evils are things that cannot be ignored and if it were truly evil I'd actually care about it enough to fight against it. As it is, the movies mean nothing to me.

    Although I do like Alice.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Yeah, I wouldn't classify ROTF as "evil" at all - I like it! Sure, it's not the best movie ever, but I'm heavily biased, so that's okay. And yeah, the movie pretty much lived up to what I was expecting from it!

    And like it or not, you can't deny the incredible strength it has bolstered for the Transformers franchise. Compare the social profile Transformers had before and after the movies. I've been a TF fan/collector since 1984 and I can _not_ remember TFs ever being so mainstream before (not saying that it's completely mainstream, but it's the closest I remember seeing).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,150

    Default

    I don't think it's "evil" either. I just wanted a catchy name for my title and that's what it was.

    (Cos after all my contention is that it does bring good to the TF franchise)
    Collection Count (w/ a 12.42% upsize): 3053
    New Family Members: DA-15 Jetwing Prime, DOTM Leader Ironhide, Perfect Effect Reflector, DOTM Shockwave & Skyhammer, eHobby United 3-packs
    Current Desires: Japanese BW Optimal Optimus
    The Holy Grail: Ultmetal Optimus Prime


    Visit the Wonderful World of: The Iacon City Hub-Capital Collection

  7. #7
    Join Date
    1st Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    516

    Default

    As much as I was disappointed by it I'm glad we even got it. Seeing Ninja Prime in the forest was Ousome! Like Skyshadow said, ROTF and TF 2007 is a novelty to me and not a real part of the TF universe. Epic it would have been if Peter Jackson had to make three TF movies. Maybe Live action TF will go the way of Batman? 4 shitty movies (Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, Batman and Robin) before someone comes along and puts it right.
    The only way from here is up!
    MEGATRON Without PRIME is like Bacon without Eggs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default


  9. #9
    Join Date
    10th Nov 2008
    Location
    Cranbourne
    Posts
    504

    Default

    To me it's no big deal. There was a writers strike on so they just used the brainstorm sheet as the script.

    I have one ROTF toy... the ice cream twins... and its a cool novelty but a really crappy toy. I didn't buy it either...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hereticpoo View Post
    Maybe Live action TF will go the way of Batman? 4 shitty movies (Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, Batman and Robin) D
    SACRILEGE!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •