This thread is for the discussion of G1 (1984-1992) comic book art and artists, as spawned from this thread.
________________________________________________
Yes, but that's your individual opinion. What I'm saying is that, according to the common/general fan consensus as illustrated by annual results from the Trannies year after year after year, the fandom as a collective rate Wildman and Senior as their two favourite artists from G1.Originally Posted by STL
I mean, I personally like Beast Machines, but I recognise that it's just my own individual opinion and that the fandom as a collective doesn't rate it very highly. And if I were going to start talking about my liking of Beast Machines, I would be required to back it up as it would be a bold statement in terms of going against the common consensus.
That's more retro-G1 than actual G1. And none of this stuff existed when the Trannies Awards were conducted. Someone might need to conduct another survey - it would need to be quite extensive (i.e.: across several communities from around the world).Originally Posted by STL
Yes, butOriginally Posted by STL
thisroller's thread topic specifies "TF comics in the 80s" (and it would cover the early 90s too as the TF comics did go into 1993), so we need to be looking at comics from that era in context of that era.
Colour really doesn't help with the colourist is as poor as Nel Yomtov. I would much rather have a well done black and white comic over a poorly coloured comic any day.Originally Posted by STL
It also depends on the artist - some artists' work just looks better in black and white than colour. A good example is the artist from the Transformers G.I. Joe series from Dreamwave that was set during the 2nd World War. I collected the original issues which were coloured and I thought the art looked kinda "messy" to me. Then I saw the reprint in black and white and I gotta say that the black and white version looks beautiful. If not for the fact that I already have the colour version, I would've bought that black and white print.
A lot of mangaka's work look better in black and white too. I remember when manga was just beginning to creep into local comic stores, there were some publishers who felt the need to colour in the English-translated manga... it looked horrid.
And really good colouring doesn't compensate for shoddy artwork... you all know that I'm no fan of Pat Lee's art, but I think Dreamwave did a good job colouring his work. In spite of that I still think his art sucks.
That was actually the fault of one of the inkers. I can't remember his name right now, but yeah, there was this one inker that kept on adding spittle, drool etc. to Wildman's pencilling. WEIRD! There was also another inker that added eyeballs (like, black dots) to José Delbo's pencilling too (making Delbo's already sub-par art look worse)!Originally Posted by liegeprime
Wildman admits that this is because he never set out to draw robots and during the 80s and early 90s he didn't "enjoy" drawing robots. Wildman was an avid fan of X-Men and became a comic artist so that he could draw super-heroes like X-Men. Then he got hired to draw Transformers - apparently he wasn't keen on the idea, but Furman coaxed him into it. So Wildman decided that he would draw Transformers in his way of drawing comic characters - like X-Men!! That's why his Transformers look so human.Originally Posted by liegeprime
That's one thing Senior does better than Wildman - Senior sees that he's drawing robots, so he sets about the task to make them look like robots.
Having said that, Wildman draws humans better - and especially super-humans. I really love his rendition of the Neo-Knights (he must've loved drawing them).