Rank 1 - New or Inactive
Internet filtering scope too broad, says Google
Web filter going ahead despite ’shelved’ reports
Pirate Party: Circumvention promotion offence like Iran, China
Reports of the filter’s death are premature
Net filter legislation status uncertain
Senator Sue Boyce: “Internet Filter Proposal Descending Into Farce”
Rank 1 - New or Inactive
Rank 1 - New or Inactive
Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
Yet another reason for me to dislike Telstra.
Telstra, in my books, has just been knocked down another notch BAM!!!During consultations on the implementation of ISP-level filtering in Australia, a number of ISPs, including Telstra, have indicated their belief that filtering should be implemented on a mandatory basis through the implementation of legislation.
Rank 1 - New or Inactive
I wouldn't take Conroy's word for it that Telstra supports mandatory filtering.
Conroy's a known liar, and Telstra have implied in the past they don't support the idea at all.
Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
Good point. Still, Telstra doesn't have a high standing in my book.
That said, this net censorship crap keeps getting pusjhed back, makes me wonder if they are still trying to figure out a way to get it to work, and makes me doubt even more that it will.
Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
We won't know if its truly over until after the next election.Originally Posted by 1AZRAEL1
Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
Oh I know it won't be over, I just doubt that this thing will actually work in the end, not that I ever thought it would anyhow. They want to put it in, and they will.
Rank 1 - New or Inactive
Only if the on-the-fence Libs support it.
Which is why if you're against it you, and anyone else opposed to the policy, should contact the Libs and express your dissatisfaction with the idea and state you won't vote for them if they support the policy.
Rank 1 - New or Inactive
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote