The Razzies are no more or less a popularity contest than the Oscars are.

I'm not sure if I agree that DB:E and A3 were 'worse' in an objective sense. Both were significantly lower budget, and were playing to a very specific viewership.

Not wanting to restart old unresolvable debates, but I think that a film like RotF, taking into account its budget and the hundreds of thousands of work hours that went into its production, had at least had a basic obligation to be coherently plotted, acceptably paced and have characters of more than 1.5 dimensions. Given how poor it was on these counts relative to the first one, I think it has thoroughly earned its Razzies.

If there was any justice in the world, that film would be on the clearout shelves with DB:E and A3 for $13....

Oh wait - it is.