That extra A$0.86 is a deal breaker, eh?
Because that's the estimated cost for a collector to collect them.
Refusing to pay aftermarket prices for any item (regardless of whether the seller acquired it for free or as a prize), seems to me to defeat the whole point of collecting. I understand your own choice to not want, but to insinuate that it "defeats the whole point of it" bewilders me greatly. Would that also mean that:
- Importing toys to Australia that are meant for the Japanese market defeats the whole point of it?
- Buying G1 Reflector with money instead of robot points defeats the whole point of it?
- Buying toys in 2010 made to be sold in 1984 defeats the whole point of it?
It seems to be a very basic tenet of collecting anything that people will buy things they want, regardless of its original purpose and price, without defeating the point of anything.![]()