Just.....um. Wow.
Wow. Well you have to believe in something I suppose
Fonzy be praised![]()
Firstly, how did you find this???? and
Secondly, she is one hot rodent
Recent Additions:
Robosen Auto Converting Optimus Prime
Incoming:
Canon Optimus
Wishlist:
MP Jazz, MP Ricochet, MP Waspinator
Selling:
Lots, just need to sort it out.
Looking For:
Seige Cyberton upgrade Optimus Prime
Hey come on... this religion makes about as much sense as any other religion really. People are entitled to believe whatever they want so long as they're not:
1) Hurting anyone else with their beliefs. I don't believe this religion's ever organised a Holy War or had terrorist organisations based around its beliefs.
2) Harrassing anyone else with their beliefs. I've never seen these people preach on street corners with microphones or shove pamphlets in my face or offer me free personality tests or knock on my door on a Saturday morning trying to convert me.
So as long as they're not hurting or hassling anyone... more power to them!
As opposed to Michelangelo's painting of God on the Sistine Chapel where He's baring his bum.A lot of religions like to worship hawt Gods and Goddesses. Just look at the Greek/Roman Pantheon...
------------------------------------
I don't think it's very nice of anyone to laugh or criticise this religion just because it's different from what you may be used to.![]()
Article 2.
* Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 18.
* Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
(The Universal Declaration of Human Rights)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfI0Kai2ILgOriginally Posted by Goktimus Prime
I suppose it depends on your definition of religion. I personally don't like the word "religion" for a few different reasons, but that's not the point right now. The world's main religions explain why the world is in its current state, and how one is to relate with it. If a religion has a doctrine of afterlife, then it will also discuss how one can attain this eternal life/how it has been attained for you.
What if what they believe is wrong? I don't know enough about this particular sect, but how could a fictional character created less than 30 years ago, explain life/universe/etc and/or offer any sense of meta-physical eternal life?People are entitled to believe whatever they want so long as they're not:
1) Hurting anyone else with their beliefs. I don't believe this religion's ever organised a Holy War or had terrorist organisations based around its beliefs.
2) Harrassing anyone else with their beliefs. I've never seen these people preach on street corners with microphones or shove pamphlets in my face or offer me free personality tests or knock on my door on a Saturday morning trying to convert me.
There may be no negative impact upon anyone else, but what if it is just wrong?
Critical reasoning has and will always be part of what it means to be human. To say that we can't use this faculty when discussing religion neglects that it is part of our very human nature. Being critical is not the same as being intolerant. I would agree that it is unfair to laugh at another's religion, but fair criticism should be welcomed rather than avoided.I don't think it's very nice of anyone to laugh or criticise this religion just because it's different from what you may be used to.![]()
![]()
We often have in our minds that to be tolerant is to simply accept that all beliefs could be equally as true as our own. This view of tolerance simply asks us to accept all opinions that an individual may hold, with no judgement upon its validity. True tolerance (as I have come to understand it) is more about the ability to accept the individual - despite any misgivings, criticisms, or judgements you may hold about their religion/creed/job/politics/etc.
It is this view of tolerance that is promoted by the Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 2.
* Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 18.
* Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
(The Universal Declaration of Human Rights)
An example:
As a Christian, I believe that there are certain things wrong in a Muslim or Jewish doctrine of God and his character. As a Protestant Christian, I disagree with some Catholic doctrine. I also disagree with the Buddhist and the Hindu as to the nature of life after death. I disagree with the Atheist on pretty much any point raised in a discussion of "religious" matters.
BUT these differences of opinion do not lead me to think any less of the individual person themselves. Hopefully this can be seen in the way I have tried to respond both to the original article, and to your post, Gok.