Quote Originally Posted by bowspearer View Post
A majorly strawman argument here.
A straw man argument is this:

Quote Originally Posted by bowspearer View Post
Do you realise you just effectively argued against the existence of museums in general there (as every single artefact in a museum was originally a commodity of some kind, even if it was just a brick)?
and this:

Quote Originally Posted by bowspearer View Post
The problem with your argument is that you're looking from the present forward as opposed to the future back, and your entire argument here falls apart as a result.
and this:

Quote Originally Posted by bowspearer View Post
In other words, we should avoid using items as evidence in court cases the moment they don't serve a function of being looked at in everyday life then. Considering that historical artifacts, or evidence, work the exact same way as evidence used in a court of law, that's exactly what you are saying.
You, on the other hand, are likening unique historical paintings to

Quote Originally Posted by bowspearer View Post
a lithograph poster
Unlike La Gioconda or Vase with Fifteen Sunflowers or No. 5, 1948, Transformers and other 80s toys - like lithographic posters - are mass-produced items that exist in such numbers that there will always be ridiculous quantities of them, not unique items that need to be preserved.