Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Aussie govt's planned mandatory net censorship regime to censor video games

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Why the hell doesn't the government just introduce a rating system that's already in place for film literature?
    Blame S.A. AG Michael Atkinson. He's the one holding back an R-rating for video games.

    He has a screwed up sense of reality and believes there should be no R-ratings for games in order to "protect adults".

    He maintains this line despite most other AGs, to my understanding, having no problems with the idea of R-ratings for games. Even one of Atkinson's own sons thinks he's stupid for holding back R-ratings for games.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Japanicus Minimus
    Posts
    7,720

    Default

    This is pretty un-workable. Its likely to just increase piracy from downloads and those who are in the know will find a way around the ISP blocking anyway.

    This Conroy guy sounds like a complete dick from what I have seen about his lame ass net censorship and now this. If I could, I would vote his ass out quick smart.

    However, if it did go through, it wold add fuel to the fire of Govt censorship debate as it would be seen as a step in the wrong direction.

    To show the crapness of the MA rating anyway, the picture at the top of Fallout 3 which was originally refused classification had a revised rating after a change. It ended up being MA, but if my memory serve me correctly, according to the guys at Good Game, all they changed was the name of the drug....
    Last edited by Tetsuwan Convoy; 25th June 2009 at 09:12 PM.

  3. #3
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tetsuwan Convoy View Post
    This Conroy guy sounds like a complete dick from what I have seen about his lame ass net censorship and now this.
    He's an absolute dick. He shouldn't be Communications Minister at all because of his behaviour and his poor understanding of technology. He doesn't even know the difference between a Megabit and a Megabyte, and has even said in public that he is unable to set up a digital TV box!

    You should have seen his performances on Q&A and Insight a couple of months back. Very face-palmy stuff.

    Rudd made a big mistake keeping Conroy in the Communications portfolio. Conroy should have been booted out of that portfolio in the recent cabinet reshuffle.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Japanicus Minimus
    Posts
    7,720

  5. #5
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tetsuwan Convoy View Post
    To show the crapness of the MA rating anyway, the picture at the top of Fallout 3 which was originally refused classification had a revised rating after a change. It ended up being MA, but if my memory serve me correctly, according to the guys at Good Game, all they changed was the name of the drug....
    that is true!

    Don't they get that an R rating would HELP? Rather than shoehorning GTA into MA and let lots of kiddies get it, it would be R and make it a fair bit tougher for the kiddies to pick up, and I assume parents would be more wary of letting their kids play an R rated game than an MA one...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •