Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Spider-Man to join the Marvel movie universe!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    4th May 2013
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    3,352

    Default

    Awesome if true...

    I would love to see Spiderman in the Avengers movie...

    Now for Wolverine to make a cameo and I would be a very happy man

  2. #22
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    Meh, as long as the new Spidey is better than that ASM crap I couldn't care if it's part the the MCU, that novelty has worn off.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,653

    Default

    I can deal with a 'soft' reboot; much like what Marvel did w/ The Incredible Hulk. I'd rather that over a full hardcore reboot that completely goes against what was established in the Sonyverse.

    I didn't mind the first Amazing Spiderman movie. The sequel was horrible though.

  4. #24
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    I can deal with a 'soft' reboot; much like what Marvel did w/ The Incredible Hulk. I'd rather that over a full hardcore reboot that completely goes against what was established in the Sonyverse.

    I didn't mind the first Amazing Spiderman movie. The sequel was horrible though.
    I didn't mind anything, I just hated the fact he wasn't part of Avengers.
    Same goes for x-men.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    23rd Jul 2015
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,493

    Default

    Gee, I hope they introduce that Spidey villain called the Demogoblin (he's better than the Original Green Goblin, the Green Goblin & the Hobgoblin).

  6. #26
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,653

    Default

    I read a rumour somewhere that Spidey's next screen villain will be Adrian Toomes/the Vulture. Of course, this rumour's been floatin' round the web ever since the first Sam Raimi film, so take it with a massive chunk o' salt.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    I read a rumour somewhere that Spidey's next screen villain will be Adrian Toomes/the Vulture. Of course, this rumour's been floatin' round the web ever since the first Sam Raimi film, so take it with a massive chunk o' salt.
    Hmm if it is Toomes wonder what the chances are of him being portrayed as a hunky 30-40ish year old person rather than the decrepit old fart he is in the comics.

    Did I just use the word hunky....

  8. #28
    Smint is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    3rd Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    363

    Default

    Such good news for Marvel fans. And such a shame Xmen is still with fox.

    Thanks to Singer I''m still waiting for an Xmen movie because we've got 5 Wolverine movies, co starring Mystique and guest appearances from the "Xmen".

    I cant stand the singerverse.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    It would cost a billion dollars, but how good would it be for the marvel superhero groups (Xmen, Avengers, GotG, FF, Spidey) to have one big crossover movie, like those epic comics that had dozens of superheroes taking on a cosmic threat to Earth.

    With different movie studios owning different Marvel superheroes, it'll never happen.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,653

    Default

    It is possible, so long as the film doesn't reference the movies owned by the other studio(s). This is why Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch were able to appear in Avengers: Age of Ultron. The film only mentions that they are super powered humans who were orphaned as children. It doesn't use the word "mutants," nor does it make any reference to Magneto being their father. Their age also conflicts with the X-Men films, as Quicksilver was still a teenager in 1973 in X-Men: Days of Future Past, thus it clearly establishes the Marvel Studios universe as being a separate continuity from Fox's Marvel universe. And as I understand it, Spider-Man will also appear in the next Avengers film, but again they cannot reference the Sony films, so most likely the film will not retell Spider-Man's origins (but perhaps make a vague reference that doesn't relate to the Sonyverse, as they did w/ the twins). This is also why Marvel can't use the word "Adamantium" in their movieverse, and instead use the word "Vibranium."

    So it is theoretically possible. It would simply involve Marvel Studios*, 20th Century Fox**, Sony☆, and possibly Universal※ & Lionsgate★ sitting down and agreeing to it. And writers would simply have to ensure that rules are followed so that the non-Marvel studios films are not directly referenced.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *Avengers (incl. Hulk, Iron Man, Capt. America, Black Widow, Hawkeye, Thor, Falcon, War Machine etc.)
    **X-Men (incl. Wolverine, Deadpool, Cable etc.) Fantastic Four (incl. Silver Surfer)
    Spider-Man
    Namor
    Man-Thing
    ================================================== ===================================
    I'm not entirely sure about how the rights for Hulk works. Hulk (2003) was made by Universal, and The Incredible Hulk was made by Universal but produced by Marvel. Marvel are able to use the Hulk in their Avengers films, and they are certainly able to even reference his origins (even directly linking it with Captain America's back story). But as I understand it, it's still Universal and not Marvel who still owns the rights to make stand alone Hulk films.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •