Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: So this years Botcon Set (2015) ...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    7th Nov 2013
    Location
    Lakelands
    Posts
    151

    Default So this years Botcon Set (2015) ...

    Has got a Brand spank'n new Prentender Shell based on unreleased Prentender shell shown off at Botcon 95. It'll be the first Double Pretender actually released, as well as the first Brand New mold released as part of Botcon Set.

    Now, I'm a young'n, born it 88, started collecting at Beast Wars and only have a few pieces pre-BW. Apart from the fact that it's brand new everything, how do you the rest of you feel about a Pretender Shell as part of Botcon history? Don't get me wrong, I'll be getting it for all the other figures, but Pretender Shells don't rank that high on my list of wants. In fact, the only scenario I could see myself getting it is if I won lotto and wanted to start collecting as many TF's as possible ...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    23rd Sep 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,352

    Default

    I've kind of already put up some opinion in the Botcon thread.

    But...

    I like it, it's this sort of thing that the club is good at doing and in my mind should really focus on. It's great that they are producing a new mold. The biggest problem I have with buying club product is it's all pretty much a repaint with or without a new head. it's hard for them to do anything cohesive like the animated set as a result.

    having said that, I don't really have a great affinity for pretenders. I have picked up a couple cheap at the parra fair in the past and find them to be very simple and uninspired. This is a much better version in my mind simply because the internal toy is so much better, not so much that it's more modern but it has an alt mode that specifically looks like a car rather than a folded up robot.

    If I was going to Botcon this year I'd be stoked to get hold of this toy, I am considering trying to find a way of affording the bagged set. either now or in the next 12 months.
    My Fan interview with Big Trev

    my original collection from when I was more impressionable.
    My Current Collection Pics (Changing on occasion)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,772

    Default

    I know it's technically not third party, I guess, but something about FunPub outsourcing the creation of a figure (not just a head or some minor parts) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Haven't quite determined what exactly it is that bothers me but it feels a bit wrong.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Feb 2013
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,019

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    I know it's technically not third party, I guess, but something about FunPub outsourcing the creation of a figure (not just a head or some minor parts) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Haven't quite determined what exactly it is that bothers me but it feels a bit wrong.
    They outsourced the development of the figure, which I would understand to mean the physical design of how it would work as a product. I'd imagine they still came up with the idea to do it and, as stated in the reveal video, clearly have input into what it will look like and the end product. So it's not like they completely outsourced it, and I'd think the actual factories doing the production are probably the same as do the others in the set. Plus, it's not even the whole figure; the actual repainted legion TFs were presumably designed by the same group that did the rest of the set. So it's not like it's been totally outsourced and now some other company that isn't Hasbro, Takara, or FunPub are making TFs everywhere.

    More generally, I have to say that this year's set is one of the most desirable in recent memory, probably only matched by last year's set, which was then only really attractive because of Skorponok. But this set is made up of two of the best regarded Generations moulds of the last two years, one of the best regarded Universe figures, an otherwise unreleased in the west toy with accessories the same, and now an almost completely new toy. It's enough to make me want to source the set despite not going to the con, and my rule is I'll only get exclusives from cons I've been to (so that's a big fat zero so far). I think it's awesome.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    14th May 2008
    Location
    Back in Brisbane
    Posts
    2,477

    Default

    I prefer cohesive sets rather than a smattering of figures that will need to be spilt across my collection. I understand the logic of trying to appeal to everyone but i think if you are good you can make a great cohesive set that will be a winner.

    I do like the idea of them recreating this double pretender. It looks very faithful to the original and was designed by a company that Hasbro uses themselves.
    "I am not a gun. I'm hitting people with a hammer. On Mars."
    The Iron Giant / David Wildgoose

  6. #6
    Join Date
    20th Apr 2015
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    30

    Default

    I'm not a big fan of Pretenders as such, but I like that this is there for all those who are. And it certainly at least tries to hit the same beat as last year's Headmaster.

    That said, I find the idea of an incarnation of Megatron who struck out as a galactic conqueror and became a crime boss instead strangely appealing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    I know it's technically not third party, I guess, but something about FunPub outsourcing the creation of a figure (not just a head or some minor parts) kind of rubs me the wrong way. Haven't quite determined what exactly it is that bothers me but it feels a bit wrong.
    Technically it is no different to Kreo... Hasbro outsources the production of Kreo from a South Korean company, which is not the same as the Chinese factories making toys for Hasbro as the Sth Korean company (Oxford) is noted on the Kreo packaging.

    If FunPub have created heads and wings for their exclusive toys that were not provided by Hasbro, why not something larger. This shell is still non-convertible, and only has three moving parts, so wasn't that difficult to create by BossFight Studios who have done whole action figures in the past.

    On the other hand, when BotCon 2004 had that Actionmaster G2 Breakdown handed out, for a long time it was considered a BotCon toy... but it was not a Hasbro toy, nor was it even authorised by Hasbro. So I guess it comes down to personal preference.

    So to me, the Oilmaster Shell feels wrong for not being produced in-house by Hasbro, but if it has been authorised by Hasbro like any other licensed product or toy (like meal toys), it is a legit toy... but it still feels wrong for some unknown reason.
    Maybe it's just a FunPub thing, and if 3H had done this for one of their BotCons, I might have felt differently about it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deonasis View Post
    I prefer cohesive sets rather than a smattering of figures that will need to be spilt across my collection. I understand the logic of trying to appeal to everyone but i think if you are good you can make a great cohesive set that will be a winner.
    Yep... the most cohesive sets have been the most popular - Beast Wars and Stunticons.
    The sets that are a mix-n-match of subgroups, universes or allegiances just end up looking like a mixed bag, and rely on their combined use in a comic to explain how they came together... a comic that most people won't read or remember.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    19th Oct 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    I like the concept, not fussed that it's not made "in-house" - it's licensed & approved, good enough for me.

    Though personally, the only one from that set I'd want is Battletrap, maybe Stepper (like the mould, but have no attachment to the character)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,472

    Default

    I remember seeing Pretenders in the catalog that was included in G1 Transformers and thought they were dumb at the time. Why would I want a Transformer that looks like a human? I'm still not impressed by them, but at least a couple of the characters have some good IDW fiction behind them now.
    I have a list of all G1 characters that have been released in CHUG form. You can find it here. Please feel free to let me know if I got anything wrong so I can fix it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •