Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst ... 234567891015 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 201

Thread: The Pros & Cons of Michael Bay - discussion topic

  1. #41
    Join Date
    4th Jan 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,180

    Default

    I actually think a better movie comparison to Transformers would be Fast and Furious 7. I'm not a fan of the F&F franchise but hubby dragged me along to the latest one and I was impressed with the balance between the action sequences and the flow of the storyline. With actors like Rock and Vin Diesel you don't get a lot of "expression" and yet somehow the story and the way it flowed did bring out the best of these guys while still providing fast cars, lots of explosions, action and even the odd bit of sexualisation. I was pleasantly surprised by the film actually having more to it than I expected.
    I sat there thinking - why couldn't TF4 be like this? Why couldn't they have writers bring enough substance to the story... to the characters... to make you care like this movie does? Let's face it - there are a lot of scenes in F&F that could translate directly into a Transformers storyline and even some of the vehicles matched up with past and present TF characters.

    As for Avengers. It's directed by Joss Whedon... who really does live for his characters... possibly a bit TOO much in the new film (did anyone else think they overdid the Hawkeye scenes?) but he makes a point of understanding the source material, the personalities, strengths and weaknesses and building on them (and he does this with every film/TV show he directs). You can tell he actually put thought into and cares about the storytelling aspect as well as the CGI and explosions. I always wonder what his take would be on a Transformers film as I think it would be a vastly different vision to that of Michael Bay.

    In terms of Imax, visually Transformers 4 was far superior to Avengers:Age of Ultron but the storyline in Ultron despite its faults is still far more robust, in depth and entertaining than Transformers. As TF4 proved - you can have amazing Imax scenes, good CGI and incredible surround sound but that adds up to nothing if you don't have a story that engages your audience and treats them like sentient beings.

    I think the blame for the storyline does lie with the writers, but ALSO with Bay who directs the story, the writers and the vision. I don't think he takes his main characters - his bots - seriously enough. That's really apparent when you don't even bring the actor behind the main character, Optimus Prime (ie Peter Cullen) to the world premiere despite using that character (Optimus) as the limelight piece for the media at the same event, yet you bring the actors who had no real purpose to the storyline other than to add rubbish romeo and juliet scenes (yeah - I'm talking about the waste of space who played Shane). I think Bay focusses too much on his real life actors and forgets about the real stars and the real story - his Autobots, Decepticons, and whatever you would consider those KSI bots to be. If he was taking these films seriously we would see an underlying storyline development of (as an example) Optimus Prime from Autobot leader through the struggles and trials of being on Earth, displaced and struggling with a new norm/leading his team/learning from hardship to ultimately his purpose/fate and inevitable sacrifice to save the universe and fulfil his destiny. Optimus hasn't had any consistent development or evolution through the movies in my opinion. He doesn't grow or learn or even really emote. We don't see the ramifications of his mentors betrayal on him in DoTM or AoE. We don't see the heartache and conflict of loosing arguably his best friend (Ironhide) or most trusted comrade (Ratchet) - just anger and vengeance (which doesn't fit with who Optimus is in my opinion). We don't even see him inspiring Bumblebee or any of his team. Autobots fight in front of him and he does nothing. NOTHING! A leader like Prime is supposed to be would not let that go unresolved. You can argue similar problems with all the characters (don't get me started about poor Galvatron!).
    Even with the best CGI and best voice talent in the world, without a purposeful story to emote, your characters are going to remain 2 dimensional and I think that's the current problem the Transformers movies face.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnus View Post
    Finally, I maintain that a lot of 'problems' are issues with the script, and such criticism should be levelled at the scriptwriters, not Bay.
    I disagree with this point - Look at most recent Bay or Bay affiliated movies - They all follow the same stupid trends regardless of who the writer is.

    Bay's Turtles for example, they follow all the basic failings of the TF movies and clearly identifiable in style to most Bay movies. He makes the writers write a script that basically link his action scenes together, there is no room for plot or meaningful characters.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    13th Dec 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bladestorm View Post
    I think the blame for the storyline does lie with the writers, but ALSO with Bay who directs the story, the writers and the vision...

    ...Even with the best CGI and best voice talent in the world, without a purposeful story to emote, your characters are going to remain 2 dimensional and I think that's the current problem the Transformers movies face.
    I haven't seen any F&F movies, but I agree completely with everything Bladestorm is saying in her post.

  4. #44
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    BTW, yes I still watch it somehow, but its because I am a transformers fan.
    But how I rate and view the movie as compared to the other action movies out their Transformers is going down hill and very badly.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    13th Dec 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    BTW, yes I still watch it somehow, but its because I am a transformers fan.
    But how I rate and view the movie as compared to the other action movies out their Transformers is going down hill and very badly.
    That's the thing, we all want to like the Transformers movies. The complaints that I mainly see aren't just "Ruined Forever!!!" from people who won't cut the studio any slack to re-invent their treasured childhood memories. They're about disappointment at the fact that we go in really wanting to give it a chance and wanting it to succeed. That's why we keep watching them, hoping.

    We want to like the movies, but Bay just keeps making it so damned hard for us to do.

    The most frustrating thing though, is that you watch these other action franchises and you see that it doesn't have to be this way.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,637

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yongeltron View Post
    We want to like the movies, but Bay just keeps making it so damned hard for us to do.

    The most frustrating thing though, is that you watch these other action franchises and you see that it doesn't have to be this way.
    ^Amen!

    I watch these films out of fan obligation. When a few film comes out, I always watch it on the first day. I expect the film to suck, but desperately hope to be proven wrong. I dare them to prove us wrong on Transformers 5 and make it freakin' awesome. Go ahead... make us eat our words. DO EET!!

  7. #47
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    ^Amen!

    I watch these films out of fan obligation. When a few film comes out, I always watch it on the first day. I expect the film to suck, but desperately hope to be proven wrong. I dare them to prove us wrong on Transformers 5 and make it freakin' awesome. Go ahead... make us eat our words. DO EET!!
    We'll have Hoverboards by 2015...oh wait..

  8. #48
    Join Date
    19th May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Yeah, but it becomes a sore point when the humans become more of a focus for the story than the Transformers. As Demonac pointed out, none of the Transformers in the film have any personality (save Optimus Prime in Age of Extinction, and even then a lot of people didn't like that personality, including Peter Cullen) -- what limited characterisation that existed in the films was more focused on the humans. The first three movies felt like "The Adventure of Sam & the US Army vs Giant Robots." The Autobots felt more like high powered accessories for the human protagonists, much like say J.A.R.V.I.S. was to Tony Stark in the Iron Man and Avengers films.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bladestorm View Post
    I think the blame for the storyline does lie with the writers, but ALSO with Bay who directs the story, the writers and the vision. I don't think he takes his main characters - his bots - seriously enough. That's really apparent when you don't even bring the actor behind the main character, Optimus Prime (ie Peter Cullen) to the world premiere despite using that character (Optimus) as the limelight piece for the media at the same event, yet you bring the actors who had no real purpose to the storyline other than to add rubbish romeo and juliet scenes (yeah - I'm talking about the waste of space who played Shane). I think Bay focusses too much on his real life actors and forgets about the real stars and the real story - his Autobots, Decepticons, and whatever you would consider those KSI bots to be. If he was taking these films seriously we would see an underlying storyline development of (as an example) Optimus Prime from Autobot leader through the struggles and trials of being on Earth, displaced and struggling with a new norm/leading his team/learning from hardship to ultimately his purpose/fate and inevitable sacrifice to save the universe and fulfil his destiny.

    Even with the best CGI and best voice talent in the world, without a purposeful story to emote, your characters are going to remain 2 dimensional and I think that's the current problem the Transformers movies face.
    I'm not going to argue this point, because I agree, but I think the problem is twofold: there's a large cast of characters to manage, but also for humans, character development takes place during 'everyday'/between action scenes, whereas the robots are only seen up to, during and after action sequences, probably since the robots are time-consuming and expensive to put on screen. It's 'ok' for humans to stand around and talk, but apparently not for robots. Perhaps there's an expectation that the robots should be seen to be doing something when they're on screen (although this hasn't always been the case).

    Also, as I posted before, humans are there to be relatable/audience surrogates, since our world is the backdrop for these battles.

    After all, I did say I also wanted to see more robot screen time, and we have been getting it with each movie

    The director is ultimately the captain of the ship when it comes to film making, and it is the director rather than the crew who accepts acclaim or blame for the strengths and weaknesses of the film. The director has the authority to make changes to the script during filming as s/he sees fit, as well as commanding the performers and crew in bringing the script to life as a film. Similarly a Prime Minister or Premier may be the head of a government which comprises many other ministers and senators, but ultimately it is the PM or Premier who accepts ultimate ownership of that government's performance. Such is the burden of leadership.
    Yeah, I agree that the director has final say, but their decisions are based on the script, which is the foundation of the movie. Remember, movies released in the months after the writer's strike in 2008 suffered, since they were rushed in the writing phase to meet production and release deadlines. Even so, I can't help but wonder if Michael Bay is a favourite target - people don't blame Ridley Scott for Prometheus, or Sam Mendes for Skyfall's failings.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bladestorm View Post
    I actually think a better movie comparison to Transformers would be Fast and Furious 7. I'm not a fan of the F&F franchise but hubby dragged me along to the latest one and I was impressed with the balance between the action sequences and the flow of the storyline. With actors like Rock and Vin Diesel you don't get a lot of "expression" and yet somehow the story and the way it flowed did bring out the best of these guys while still providing fast cars, lots of explosions, action and even the odd bit of sexualisation. I was pleasantly surprised by the film actually having more to it than I expected.
    I sat there thinking - why couldn't TF4 be like this? Why couldn't they have writers bring enough substance to the story... to the characters... to make you care like this movie does? Let's face it - there are a lot of scenes in F&F that could translate directly into a Transformers storyline and even some of the vehicles matched up with past and present TF characters.
    It's interesting that Fast and Furious has been brought up as a comparison - it's been noted that some aspects of the movie have been compared to Bay's style, yet F&F has been reviewed more favourably. Some suspect a double-standard which views Michael Bay more negatively for whatever reason. Perhaps, as has been opined, people in cars are more 'accessible' to audiences than large alien robots.

    As for Avengers. It's directed by Joss Whedon... who really does live for his characters... possibly a bit TOO much in the new film (did anyone else think they overdid the Hawkeye scenes?) but he makes a point of understanding the source material, the personalities, strengths and weaknesses and building on them (and he does this with every film/TV show he directs). You can tell he actually put thought into and cares about the storytelling aspect as well as the CGI and explosions. I always wonder what his take would be on a Transformers film as I think it would be a vastly different vision to that of Michael Bay.
    One opinion I've read is that because Bay isn't a 'fanboy,' he might not be as invested or as sentimental as, say, Whedon (this 'investment' could also be due to the fact that Whedon wrote the scripts for both Avengers movies).

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    I disagree with this point - Look at most recent Bay or Bay affiliated movies - They all follow the same stupid trends regardless of who the writer is.

    Bay's Turtles for example, they follow all the basic failings of the TF movies and clearly identifiable in style to most Bay movies. He makes the writers write a script that basically link his action scenes together, there is no room for plot or meaningful characters.
    Have you seen The Island or even Pain and Gain? No shortage of character moments there, and I have yet to come across a Michael Bay movie where the overarching plot isn't clear or present in some form. Maybe I'm taking things too literally, but I really don't get the 'no plot' criticism.

    In Transformers, character interaction and development is taking place - just not with the robots. See above.

    Ninja Turtles had a lot of turtle screen time, more so than the first Transformers did, so on that front, the Turtles were pushed as main characters more aggressively.

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    I watch these films out of fan obligation. When a few film comes out, I always watch it on the first day. I expect the film to suck, but desperately hope to be proven wrong. I dare them to prove us wrong on Transformers 5 and make it freakin' awesome. Go ahead... make us eat our words. DO EET!!
    Um... doesn't that mentality kind of ensure you'll hate it, since you're expecting something to suck and therefore will look for aspects that suck to confirm your suspicion? I'm certainly guilty of this myself, mind you, but I'm just pointing it out.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    lol
    Don't enjoy the movies but still watch them for fear of missing out? Hasbro and Paramount Pictures would like to sincerely thank each and every one of you for fuelling the machine and funding future projects. See you all in 2017

  10. #50
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinnertwin View Post
    lol
    Don't enjoy the movies but still watch them for fear of missing out? Hasbro and Paramount Pictures would like to sincerely thank each and every one of you for fuelling the machine and funding future projects. See you all in 2017
    We like to be confirmed that it is a bad/good movie. Not because of miss out as you per say. I don't think I watched DOTM more than twice as compared to say pacific rim.

    I only watch on free rentals anyway. I enjoyed Battleship, which I actually thought it was going to be way worse than what I expected.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •