Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: No opt-out of filtered internet

  1. #11
    Pulse is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    18th Jan 2008
    Location
    at one with the matrix...
    Posts
    3,725

    Default

    Didn't the Fed Gov try to get an "adult content filter" for kids up & running last year or the year before?

    Didn't some teenager crack it almost immediately?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    17th Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pulse View Post
    Didn't the Fed Gov try to get an "adult content filter" for kids up & running last year or the year before?

    Didn't some teenager crack it almost immediately?
    Haha yeah I remember something like that, pretty much as soon as it was out it was cracked...

    Seriously though, it's a pretty stupid idea

  3. #13
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    This won't actually get up. Bob Carr suggested something similar in the 1990s and it just never happened. Sure, it's technically possible, but it'll be pointless. So they block a site on [say] how to build your own atomic bomb. The thing would just get mirrored. ASCII text is replaced by a GIF of the same text, so the 3 guys scouring the net for "bad" content will take months if not years to find it.

    This is as much pie in the sky as the RIAA's attempts at stopping illegal downloading. Site will move and content will get around the system. And the idiots dumb enough to handle Plutonium in their backyard shed will develop acute radiation poisioning either way
    It still might get up and going though as the idiocity of our polititions knows no bounds.

    But I'd fully expect full and brutal retaliation from corporations and business when it ends up totally stuffing up their network speeds and abilities to offer customers reliable web interfacing to their stores.
    Code:
    O o 
      _
     / --------------------------------
    |      IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!!
     \_--------------------------------

  4. #14
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    This won't actually get up. Bob Carr suggested something similar in the 1990s and it just never happened. Sure, it's technically possible, but it'll be pointless. So they block a site on [say] how to build your own atomic bomb. The thing would just get mirrored. ASCII text is replaced by a GIF of the same text, so the 3 guys scouring the net for "bad" content will take months if not years to find it.

    This is as much pie in the sky as the RIAA's attempts at stopping illegal downloading. Site will move and content will get around the system. And the idiots dumb enough to handle Plutonium in their backyard shed will develop acute radiation poisioning either way
    Agreed.

    This stuff never stops the actual people that want to access the naughty stuff. The best they can implement is either HTTP proxies or some variety of unencrypted packet sniffing. This won't affect encrypted torrents, SSH tunnels, something like TOR, or anything else that's encrypted.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    5th Apr 2008
    Location
    Toyooka
    Posts
    3,229

    Default

    When i see crap like this, i'm reminded of the Jurassic Park quote: "life uh... finds a way". No matter what they do, there's always going to be more people, who are more dedicated, who can and will undo it. And it only ever takes one to figure it out, then anyone can do it.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MV75 View Post
    It still might get up and going though as the idiocity of our polititions knows no bounds.
    I should clarify. I meant the idea won't actually get up in a practical sense. They may try and implement it, but it wont ultimately succeed.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  7. #17
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    I should clarify. I meant the idea won't actually get up in a practical sense. They may try and implement it, but it wont ultimately succeed.
    My sentiment exactly.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    16th Jul 2008
    Location
    Melb
    Posts
    3,962

    Default

    Urgh, I gigantic websense would be annoying

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •