Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: eBay USA thoughts, comments and feedback

  1. #21
    Join Date
    10th May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravagecat View Post
    Finally my question for you guys....
    Should I leave negative feedback to the seller for the SDCC figure set or Neutral at the very least??
    The reason is this...yes the seller had great communication and sent the item quickly but he only wrapped the box in large scale bubble wrap then modified another box to fit snugly around the SDCC box leaving no room for movement (shock absorption etc) also meaning any damage done to the outside box was also incurred to the inside box resulting in the beautiful artwork on the front of the SDCC box looking like a piece of corrugated iron The toys inside were not damaged thank god...Oh and by the way the seller did write on the outside box in marker pen "fragile please do not crush" with a big smiley face which IMO just made it a bigger target
    So do I do a Jim Carey and "bend over and take it up the tailpipe" or ask for a partial refund or just leave some sort of negative feedback?? What would you guys do??
    If it's the Titan Guardians figure set, they were all pretty much hammered when they hit the floor at SDCC. There's not many in great condition.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    14th Mar 2012
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,108

    Default

    Thanks for all your comments guys...I'm glad you are all of the opinion of communicating with the seller first
    I really hate angry ebayers (and there seems to be a lot out there) that just slam people with negative feedback because something is not exactly as the imagined or expected when a solution or compromise could of been accomplished by simply contacting the seller first

  3. #23
    Join Date
    22nd Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,266

    Default

    But I believe we can all agree Australia post handling of parcel is just amazing.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    The Ebay "Global Shipping Program" thingy is annoying, but was probably a result of people scamming ebay or buyers scamming sellers with claims of items not arriving.

    If a listing is using it (and if it isn't obvious), it won't let you use a Post-box address, so ebay won't let you go through Checkout until you change your address (which isn't clear as to why it is refusing your address, despite the original listing saying it ships to Australia).

    Then when the customer service person suggested changing my address from a POBox address, the payment went through, but most of the shipping went to an unknown third party. Ordinarily that would be fair, because at least you know that the seller isn't shafting you on the shipping quote... but in this instance of mine, I won the item for $2 and wanted him to send it by a cheaper shipping option (the GSP demanded $44) which would have only been about $20 by USPS for trackable shipping (to still cover us both for paypal/ebay)... leaving him with an extra $20.

    I know it isn't necessary, and I'd still be paying the same total amount, but I just felt bad for the seller getting stuck with just $2 for a complete boxed Built to Rule set.
    And I know it is part of the risk of ebay auctions, but I don't see why a $2 item needs $44 in postage... when some of that can be kept by the seller, and I still pay less than my maximum anyway.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    15th Apr 2010
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    5,893

    Default

    agree, expensive shipping

  6. #26
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Well so far items are arriving at my parcel locker. all my ebay items are going to it without issues.

    The posting options on ebay isn't very accurate, I believe ebay.com had more flexibility in adding insurance, registered, ship to what places exclude whatever......

    Some of my items overseas did not even reach to Australia Post system but it arrived.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    I really think that Ebay should instate a small listing fee, as the current system of "free until it sells" is driving up prices, by people who have no incentive to drop them if they don't need the money.
    I know it is intentional by ebay to encourage people to pad out ebay with more listings, but more and more of the collectable stuff is not selling, and fewer people are having low-starting auctions (or auctions at all) to sell at what the market is willing to pay. In the past when Ebay had listing fees, the Buy-It-Now option was rarely used, as it was something you maybe used once if you thought there was enough demand for it to be snapped up at an excessive price (otherwise you were stuck with a hefty listing fee and no sale). Now it seems people just sit on items for years, sometimes never selling (or even willing to discount). One item I've had on my watch list for 3 years now (yes, since 2010), is a $50 SCF figure. It's obviously not worth $50 or else someone would have bought it by now... but since there is no incentive to discount (no ebay fees to force a quicker sale to make a profit), it's just going to keep sitting there. (and I've asked if they would drop the price after all this time... but no)
    This dealer was one I was looking through because they advertised on TFW recently, and you'll see on that link (if you are member of ebay) the completed listings... and less than 10% sold (25 of their recent 277 TFs items). I then clicked on some of their relisted items, and they were all the same price. So even though no one bought or bid on 91% of their items because they over-valued them (compared to what the market obviously values them at), there is no incentive to list them at "market value" because it is free until they eventually sell.

    Perhaps they should have a tiny fee for repeat listings, and then their regular % fee if it sells. That way, it remains free for a one-off listing for the seller to see if there is interest at their preferred price, and then they have a choice to relist it for a fee that will be negligible at first, but will start adding up if they don't start turning over their stock.
    Because as much as ebay gets people listing lots of stuff for free, if they don't have an incentive to turn over that stock, the listings will plateau as most will only have the time to manage a certain number of listings at one time.
    And people will be less likely looking if bargains are harder to find (especially if the 10% of items that are selling to rich or desperate buyers, encourages other sellers to bump up their prices believing it to be "market value" - one random sale to a rich or desperate collector doesn't make "market value", the recent average auction win is what the "market" is willing to pay).
    It's making it harder to buy rarer items if sellers keep sitting on them (including collectable stores who watch ebay listings), instead of auctioning them off to get what they are actually worth.

    It'd be like a flea market that wants to increase its business by starting to only charge people if they sell stuff. Sure, there would be a surge of sellers, but they would be less willing to discount if they don't have a financial penalty for being there now (minimum sales don't need to be as high to cover their costs of being there). And sure, they would keep coming back each week with their hefty prices, but they will only be able to bring in a certain amount of stuff each time (meaning, the flea market reaches a certain capacity eventually)... and buyers are less likely to go back if there is less of a chance for a bargain.
    Ebay used to be like a flea market - full of bargains and items that needed to sell. Now it is full of greedy people, teasing us with stuff we can never afford, that they don't need to sell.
    (it probably also encourages Knock-Offs, seeing how much they could sell a fake for, or catering for the majority of people who can no longer afford the original)

  8. #28
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    I used to look upon Ebay as first source to get cheap deals for toys, now I know this would be my last resort for all new toys. Things have definitely changed.

    Most current toys on ebay are 20% mark up as they consider the commission they have to pay ebay as well.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    27th Apr 2012
    Location
    perth
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffin View Post
    I really think that Ebay should instate a small listing fee, as the current system of "free until it sells" is driving up prices, by people who have no incentive to drop them if they don't need the money.
    I know it is intentional by ebay to encourage people to pad out ebay with more listings, but more and more of the collectable stuff is not selling, and fewer people are having low-starting auctions (or auctions at all) to sell at what the market is willing to pay. In the past when Ebay had listing fees, the Buy-It-Now option was rarely used, as it was something you maybe used once if you thought there was enough demand for it to be snapped up at an excessive price (otherwise you were stuck with a hefty listing fee and no sale). Now it seems people just sit on items for years, sometimes never selling (or even willing to discount). One item I've had on my watch list for 3 years now (yes, since 2010), is a $50 SCF figure. It's obviously not worth $50 or else someone would have bought it by now... but since there is no incentive to discount (no ebay fees to force a quicker sale to make a profit), it's just going to keep sitting there. (and I've asked if they would drop the price after all this time... but no)
    This dealer was one I was looking through because they advertised on TFW recently, and you'll see on that link (if you are member of ebay) the completed listings... and less than 10% sold (25 of their recent 277 TFs items). I then clicked on some of their relisted items, and they were all the same price. So even though no one bought or bid on 91% of their items because they over-valued them (compared to what the market obviously values them at), there is no incentive to list them at "market value" because it is free until they eventually sell.

    Perhaps they should have a tiny fee for repeat listings, and then their regular % fee if it sells. That way, it remains free for a one-off listing for the seller to see if there is interest at their preferred price, and then they have a choice to relist it for a fee that will be negligible at first, but will start adding up if they don't start turning over their stock.
    Because as much as ebay gets people listing lots of stuff for free, if they don't have an incentive to turn over that stock, the listings will plateau as most will only have the time to manage a certain number of listings at one time.
    And people will be less likely looking if bargains are harder to find (especially if the 10% of items that are selling to rich or desperate buyers, encourages other sellers to bump up their prices believing it to be "market value" - one random sale to a rich or desperate collector doesn't make "market value", the recent average auction win is what the "market" is willing to pay).
    It's making it harder to buy rarer items if sellers keep sitting on them (including collectable stores who watch ebay listings), instead of auctioning them off to get what they are actually worth.

    It'd be like a flea market that wants to increase its business by starting to only charge people if they sell stuff. Sure, there would be a surge of sellers, but they would be less willing to discount if they don't have a financial penalty for being there now (minimum sales don't need to be as high to cover their costs of being there). And sure, they would keep coming back each week with their hefty prices, but they will only be able to bring in a certain amount of stuff each time (meaning, the flea market reaches a certain capacity eventually)... and buyers are less likely to go back if there is less of a chance for a bargain.
    Ebay used to be like a flea market - full of bargains and items that needed to sell. Now it is full of greedy people, teasing us with stuff we can never afford, that they don't need to sell.
    (it probably also encourages Knock-Offs, seeing how much they could sell a fake for, or catering for the majority of people who can no longer afford the original)
    Agree 100% people just putting up their favourite pieces at stupid prices and just hitting resist every 30 days. Pretty much just waiting for some inexperienced collector to over pay for stuff

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •