View Poll Results: TFPrime Dlx Cliffjumper - worth buying?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    15 93.75%
  • Only if...

    1 6.25%
  • No

    0 0%
  • Not interested

    0 0%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Toy Review - TFPrime FE Deluxe Cliffjumper

  1. #11
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SharkyMcShark View Post
    The wrists do swivel.
    They do?!? I tried turning mine and they didn't budge... maybe I need to apply more excessive force... I'll try it when I get home.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Okay, I played around with Cliffjumper earlier this evening. At first the hands still wouldn't turn even though I used quite a lot of excessive force... any more and I probably would have snapped the hands off (there was even an indent in my thumb where I'd been pushing against the hands -- the indent lasted for several minutes after I finished mucking around with Cliffjumper and there was a tingling sensation... that's how hard I was pushing).

    So then I stopped and examined the forearm section and pushed the inside section (where the gun is concealed) thoroughly in all the way and tried again. It was a bit stiff, but indeed the hands did turn!! Praise Primus!

    You just gotta be sure that the inner forearm sections are pushed in all the way first... which can be easily overlooked because they don't securely lock in (not on mine anyway) and easily come out just ever so slightly that at a glance you wouldn't notice, but it does impede on the wrist articulation.



    So my opinion of this toy has improved, however I do wish that the inner forearms could 'lock' in better and better prevent the outer wrist "guards" from obstructing the hands' articulation. Revised rating for this toy: 8/10

  3. #13
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    Just want to put a warning out there for this otherwise flawless toy - be careful with the head/neck ball-joint. Mine popped off while transforming it, and I noticed a stress mark on the socket inside the head. Unfortunately, the light-piping gimmick of the eyes has been moulded into a piece that goes all the way through the head to be the socket for the neck. It isn't a strong, load-bearing type of plastic... and even though the ball-joint isn't part of the transformation to take on any intentional force, the action of the head popping out and being placed back in IS excessive to the piece of plastic. So be careful... especially as the toy ages and the plastic becomes less flexible over time.

  4. #14
    Decepticon Guest

    Default

    Why does this Cliffjumper look like a goat, with hooves and all? It kinda irritates me now cos all I see is a goat staring back at me.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Decepticon View Post
    Why does this Cliffjumper look like a goat,
    Because that's how the cartoon designed him. Not the toy's fault. (one disadvantage of having Transformers designed as show characters first and toys second) - but it's most likely because of the bullhorns hood ornament on the vehicle mode. This certainly wouldn't be the first time we've had Transformers whose robot mode head was 'based on' the alt mode; just look at Beast Wars Neo and Car Robot (RiD).

    Quote Originally Posted by Decepticon View Post
    with hooves and all?
    They help him to count!

    "Hey Cliffjumper, how many live action TF movies have there been?"
    *clop.clop.clop*

    The feet don't really look like hooves.

    You know what I really love about this toy? It's not Bumblebee! Not a repaint. Not a retool. A purely original Cliffjumper toy. The first original Cliffjumper toy since 1984!

  6. #16
    Decepticon Guest

    Default

    The first original Cliffjumper toy since 1984!
    Is it really? Didnt realize that.
    I must admit I have the RID Prime Cliffjumper and he looks more of a goat than this one. I still believe he has hooves!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Decepticon View Post
    Is it really? Didnt realize that.
    Well there was Energon Cliffjumper who was an original mould, but he's not really based on or inspired by G1 Cliffjumper -- he's just an Autobot buggy who happens to carry the name 'Cliffjumper'. TF Prime Cliffjumper is the first Cliffjumper toy since 1984 who is meant to be a homage to G1 Cliffjumper and is NOT a repaint/retool of Bumblebee.

    Quote Originally Posted by Decepticon View Post
    I must admit I have the RID Prime Cliffjumper and he looks more of a goat than this one. I still believe he has hooves!
    Okay, but this thread is discussing First Edition Cliffjumper, so I assumed that was what you were talking about. If you like, there's another thread for discussing TF Prime RiD Cliffjumper here.

    I don't have TFP RiD Cliffjumper; since I already have FE Cliffjumper I sure don't feel like paying $30 for TFP RiD Cliffjumper (even if he's a new mould). Maybe if I find one on sale... (because the head problem griffin mentioned is kinda worrying me - having TFPRiD Cliffjumper means I can keep that in vehicle mode and FE in robot mode and won't need to transform them back and forth much).

  8. #18
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    I just noticed today that this toy has two faux wheels on the back of the upper legs for no apparent reason (because all four wheels are clearly visible in robot mode). The cavity in the robot body is quite spacious - big enough to fit a Diaclone pilot!

    Pics!


    Aaah the irony that of all the TF Prime toys to hold a Diaclone, it's the toy that's a homage to a Microman-based character.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,089

    Default

    I had a look at Tets's Cliffie on Saturday, All I can say is the plastic flow marks were shocking. I had a look at mine and it doesn't seem to be suffering the same condition. Mine is the U.S version where as I believe tetsters version is the Japanese one. Would it be correct in assuming the glitter affect is only in the Japanese version so that's why my Cliffjumper isn't suffering extrusion flow

  10. #20
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Mine's a Takara version and I haven't noticed any unsightly marks. Do you remember which part of Tetsuwan Convoy's Cliffjumper had those marks? Maybe Tecchan got unlucky with QC?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •