Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Referring to TF:Prime toys as RID

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,840

    Default Referring to TF:Prime toys as RID

    I wonder can we not call the wave 1+ Transformers Prime toys "RID"?

    There is a toy series we know as RID. A very good one from a decade ago with a mix of something for everybody: beasts and cars and trucks and combiners and a ten-changer and a not too shabby anime cartoon.

    The packaging in all the pics I've seen, of both the European and American releases, quite clearly say "Transformers Prime" on them.

    It's suggested, and seems more plausible, that the 'robots in disguise' phrase is the new equivalent to Mechtech, to differentiate the deluxe/revealer, voyager/poweriser, leader/weaponiser scales from the legion/commander size in "Cyberverse" (as with the DOTM toys).

    DOTM toys didn't need to be called Mechtech when they were referred to. Mostly that was just skipped over.

    The only toys that need perhaps to be differentiated are the First Edition / FE ones.

    Just call them TF:Prime or Prime or TFP or whatever, but please stop calling them RID toys.

    [/Rant]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2010
    Location
    Camden
    Posts
    2,978

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    [/Rant]
    I Agree!!

    #Like
    UP UP CRONULLA

    Follow Me on:

    Twitter - @Sharky_Wattsy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    RID is a subtitle for the larger figures, like Mechtech was for the Movie toys (they kept Cyberverse as the subtitle for the smaller figures, but needed to change the larger subtitle). I didn't call the Movie toys Mechtech, so I won't be calling the larger TFPrime toys as RID here (in any official, info or news posting).

    I would be editing news topic titles that use RID as well, because of the current comic... as it would be confusing.
    (as to what people call them in the body of their posts, is up to them - I won't be editing people's posts if it is known what they are referring to)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,840

    Default

    Within posts/topics/context it's been perfectly clear, but it's starting to become dominant on other TF websites.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    I just looked at the Cliffjumper comparison topic at Seibertron, and can see the need to use the two acronyms within a posting to make it easier to refer to each quickly, but don't see a need for RID to be used in a topic title... especially since the FE set is essentially been and gone now. If it was an ongoing line with the Regular "RID" toys, then there might be an allowance for it, but fortunately there shouldn't be anymore news on the FE set, so don't need a prefix for the regular figures in news titles to differentiate them from the FE figures.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    18th Jan 2012
    Location
    top ryde
    Posts
    87

    Default

    But I thought all transformer lines were associated with the old catch phrase Robots In Disguise, isn't it just that though?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •