Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Hasbro continues its "greener" packaging initiatives

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    5th Jul 2010
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Don't get me wrong im all in for greener business practices, but i just hope that the cost of this change doesn't pass through and effect budgets on toys.
    I want a range like back in the unicron trilogy.
    Follow me on twitter:
    @Kal_ElofKrypton
    @Soundwaves_cast

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KalEl View Post
    Don't get me wrong im all in for greener business practices, but i just hope that the cost of this change doesn't pass through and effect budgets on toys.
    I want a range like back in the unicron trilogy.
    One would think that less money spent on packaging would mean more money available to spend on the toy. Considering how incredibly tight Hasbro are with their toy budgeting where they will skimp on a drop of paint to ensure that a toy won't exceed its budget, if they're going to be using less materials in producing smaller packaging, then surely that money saved can be passed onto the toy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th Jul 2010
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    One would think that less money spent on packaging would mean more money available to spend on the toy. Considering how incredibly tight Hasbro are with their toy budgeting where they will skimp on a drop of paint to ensure that a toy won't exceed its budget, if they're going to be using less materials in producing smaller packaging, then surely that money saved can be passed onto the toy.
    not necessarily, 'green packaging' can quite often be more expensive. size isn't the issue. (not so say it is going to cost them more to be more environmental friendly), i'm just hoping if it does that it doesn't effect the toy budget.
    Follow me on twitter:
    @Kal_ElofKrypton
    @Soundwaves_cast

  4. #4
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    One would think that less money spent on packaging would mean more money available to spend on the toy. Considering how incredibly tight Hasbro are with their toy budgeting where they will skimp on a drop of paint to ensure that a toy won't exceed its budget, if they're going to be using less materials in producing smaller packaging, then surely that money saved can be passed onto the toy.
    Any savings on packaging will be passed to the profit margin. Keep in mind that this is still a modern corporation.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th Feb 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    then surely that money saved can be passed onto the toy.
    Why would they ever do that?

    Any money saved goes to the shareholders.
    I'm really just here for the free food and open bar.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SharkyMcShark View Post
    Why would they ever do that?

    Any money saved goes to the shareholders.
    Yeah, in the 21st century corporate world, the customer comes last

  7. #7
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    Also, note that they emphasised "recycled packaging", which would be a higher cost, perhaps offsetting savings made by having smaller packaging.
    And smaller packaging is something that would be a balancing act - smaller packaging means cheaper shipping for Hasbro from China (more units per shipping container and less weight in the packaging), but bigger packaging can make the product look more "value for money".
    It's why the robot modes (the bigger of the two modes) are often used in Voyager class toys, as they are a higher price, but not proportionally bigger to match that price (close to double price in America, but not double size toy).
    While things like the First Edition Deluxes having that big empty space at the bottom of the bubble being padded out with a cardboard "display stand" to hide the empty space.
    Anything to make the product on the shelf look bigger than it really is, to "deceive" consumers (parents & gift-getters) that their toy at $X is bigger and better value than another toy at the same price in more streamlined packaging.
    Kreo does this well.
    Some look like decent value on the shelf, and may look bigger than similarly priced Lego boxes (which haven't listed piece counts on them to compare that way), but open up many of the Kreo sets and it is 1/2 to 3/4 empty (Ratchet was the worst).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    5th Jul 2010
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffin View Post
    Also, note that they emphasised "recycled packaging", which would be a higher cost, perhaps offsetting savings made by having smaller packaging.
    This is part of what im saying
    Follow me on twitter:
    @Kal_ElofKrypton
    @Soundwaves_cast

  9. #9
    Join Date
    1st Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    Yeah, in the 21st century corporate world, the customer comes last
    Truer words have never been spoken.

    Some retailers that are "environmentally friendly" will now charge you 10 cents if you want a plastic bag. But this practice is not reflected in their pricing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •