Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Hasbro continues its "greener" packaging initiatives

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SharkyMcShark View Post
    Why would they ever do that?

    Any money saved goes to the shareholders.
    Yeah, in the 21st century corporate world, the customer comes last

  2. #2
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    Also, note that they emphasised "recycled packaging", which would be a higher cost, perhaps offsetting savings made by having smaller packaging.
    And smaller packaging is something that would be a balancing act - smaller packaging means cheaper shipping for Hasbro from China (more units per shipping container and less weight in the packaging), but bigger packaging can make the product look more "value for money".
    It's why the robot modes (the bigger of the two modes) are often used in Voyager class toys, as they are a higher price, but not proportionally bigger to match that price (close to double price in America, but not double size toy).
    While things like the First Edition Deluxes having that big empty space at the bottom of the bubble being padded out with a cardboard "display stand" to hide the empty space.
    Anything to make the product on the shelf look bigger than it really is, to "deceive" consumers (parents & gift-getters) that their toy at $X is bigger and better value than another toy at the same price in more streamlined packaging.
    Kreo does this well.
    Some look like decent value on the shelf, and may look bigger than similarly priced Lego boxes (which haven't listed piece counts on them to compare that way), but open up many of the Kreo sets and it is 1/2 to 3/4 empty (Ratchet was the worst).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th Jul 2010
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffin View Post
    Also, note that they emphasised "recycled packaging", which would be a higher cost, perhaps offsetting savings made by having smaller packaging.
    This is part of what im saying
    Follow me on twitter:
    @Kal_ElofKrypton
    @Soundwaves_cast

  4. #4
    Join Date
    1st Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    Yeah, in the 21st century corporate world, the customer comes last
    Truer words have never been spoken.

    Some retailers that are "environmentally friendly" will now charge you 10 cents if you want a plastic bag. But this practice is not reflected in their pricing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •