Results 1 to 10 of 110

Thread: WIP masterpiece slipstream

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Iriorne is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    31st Oct 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Hmmm... reducing the ears might be the easiest solution. If necessary, there's also about 2mm of space at the top that you can recover by dremelling out the head pass-through as well. Another option might just be to scale the head well and have it non-transformable? Just pop it off the ball when converting to jet.

    If you want to get a feel for how the face scales, here's a front-on photo of the head:

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...head_trans.png

    Are you able to set it as a texture on the front of the block head and and post a front-on render?

    Edit: I'd be wary of scaling the head too small as the MP-03 seeker head is proportionally quite small to begin with, particularly the width.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    26th Jan 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,204

    Default

    yeah i agree , that you should reduce the ears as the head scale is small to begin with..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,388

    Default

    Cool, I'll give it a try. Back to the drawing board.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd Sep 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,352

    Default

    As awesome as it already looks, reducing the width of the ear may add to the femininity of the sculpt. just a thought.

    brilliant work by the way.
    My Fan interview with Big Trev

    my original collection from when I was more impressionable.
    My Current Collection Pics (Changing on occasion)

  5. #5
    Iriorne is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    31st Oct 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Just had a thought: what if instead of just reducing the width, you adjusted the angle of the ears? Make them more swept back and streamlined?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    26th Jan 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iriorne View Post
    Just had a thought: what if instead of just reducing the width, you adjusted the angle of the ears? Make them more swept back and streamlined?
    That would be interesting ....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,388

    Default

    Thanks for the ideas guys. I'll have a play and see what I can come up with. Maybe even a combination.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •