It's not actually the product placement itself that was the problem - that's the one bit of the alleged contract that Paramount has fulfilled. However, I believe they failed to supply the hotel with an exhibit of props, a VIP celebration and a premiere. As a consequence, the Plaza was demanding the product placement be removed from the film - that's the soured part.Originally Posted by BigTransformerTrev
I've read about this in a few different places. What was their actual problem? Did the hotel get blown up in the flick? Was it on screen not enough? Was there some sub-sub clause that had not been properly signed? I mean, it was described as 'product placement gone sour' but not actually why it went sour. Unless it's that the hotel transformed into Trypticons balls it sounds like the Pangu Plaza lot need to get the starch out of their grundys
Reply With Quote