Page 17 of 41 FirstFirst ... 712131415161718192021222737 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 407

Thread: Masterpiece MP-23 Exhaust

  1. #161
    Join Date
    5th Apr 2008
    Location
    Toyooka
    Posts
    3,229

    Default

    Honestly, i don't think it'll get completely blocked from release... but i hope they scrap it and release a Slicer inspired deco instead.

  2. #162
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    It may get blocked if Hong Kong has issues there.
    Hell I have two of these on pre order. I guess just see what happens.

  3. #163
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    i really wish i could care enough to be concerned about this figures release, buuuut... i'm not- first world problems and all that

  4. #164
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    I still disagree is a logo, this is like Apple patent right block shape phones.
    Apple has filed suit against Woolworths for their apple shaped logo. AFAIK the case is still ongoing.
    http://www.smh.com.au/technology/biz...1004-ghxe.html

    This goes back to what defines a knock off as opposed to a counterfeit. A counterfeit is a direct imitation, but a "knock off" can be anything which bears resemblance, but isn't actually an imitation.

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    So how do model kits sell nowadays? They must pay for every single sponsor ad?
    Yes. It's called licensing. e.g. MP Bumblebee transforms into a licensed VW Beetle, and part of the licence which TakaraTOMY has paid for allows them to use VW's logos on the packaging and toy.

    Quote Originally Posted by drifand View Post
    Find it funny how hungry jacks cannot use Burger King when the rest of the world is known for that and the restaurant owner gets to win in this situation.
    Here's why.

  5. #165
    Join Date
    18th Jun 2012
    Location
    St Clair
    Posts
    1,982

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinnertwin View Post
    i really wish i could care enough to be concerned about this figures release, buuuut... i'm not- first world problems and all that
    Pretty much this ^

    If it was an integral character I may care but it is just a re paint to get money out of a mold
    Don't see the big drama

  6. #166
    Join Date
    7th Mar 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    6,605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream77 View Post
    Pretty much this ^

    If it was an integral character I may care but it is just a re paint to get money out of a mold
    Don't see the big drama
    The most self entitled population on the planet has been told they can't have something. Irrespective of how important/essential it is, there was always going to be rage
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain

  7. #167
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Apple has filed suit against Woolworths for their apple shaped logo. AFAIK the case is still ongoing.
    http://www.smh.com.au/technology/biz...1004-ghxe.html

    This goes back to what defines a knock off as opposed to a counterfeit. A counterfeit is a direct imitation, but a "knock off" can be anything which bears resemblance, but isn't actually an imitation.


    Yes. It's called licensing. e.g. MP Bumblebee transforms into a licensed VW Beetle, and part of the licence which TakaraTOMY has paid for allows them to use VW's logos on the packaging and toy.


    Here's why.
    its business name was already trademarked by a takeaway food,
    Ur the name Burger King was globally done so why Burger King take this guy to court for using something that is already known? Are you saying this guy had Burger King named before Burger King was invented?

    It be half arse funny if this was Maccus , being called hungry macs or something because some one stole the name and claim it here first.

    As for Apple suing woollies that logo is far off, and IMO Apple should be fined for such wasting time. That's worse than this toy's claim. Very shameful claim.

  8. #168
    Join Date
    23rd Sep 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,352

    Default

    I think a large part of the US issue with the logo is it's application on a childrens toy. I recall reading one of the letters to one of the toy sellers that was posted on both TFW and Seibertron that the logo is part of the Marlboro Trademark but the larger issue is the item being a Toy with tobacco branding on it.
    My Fan interview with Big Trev

    my original collection from when I was more impressionable.
    My Current Collection Pics (Changing on occasion)

  9. #169
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream77 View Post
    Pretty much this ^

    If it was an integral character I may care but it is just a re paint to get money out of a mold
    Don't see the big drama
    No drama until a confirmation that this piece is scraped. As it is, it seems like it's only be taken off websites.

  10. #170
    drifand is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    20th Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UltraMarginal View Post
    I think a large part of the US issue with the logo is it's application on a childrens toy. I recall reading one of the letters to one of the toy sellers that was posted on both TFW and Seibertron that the logo is part of the Marlboro Trademark but the larger issue is the item being a Toy with tobacco branding on it.
    And half of the children today won't even know the brand because it's taken off in sporting events and our cigarette packs . Of course the US themselves may still have the full coloured Marlboro pack which was the alarm bells despite Exhaust is just a red and white car. For all you know, TT may just add a few more triangles and whoala, they are no longer using a known trademark but again debatable by Marlboro .

    Anyway here is what RK said

    To USA customers,

    We hereby announce the following situation regarding the item “Takara Transformers Masterpiece MP-23 Decepticon Exhaust”

    This item was claimed by Phillip Morris USA, that infringe PM USA’s MARLBORO Roof Design.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •