Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Rumour on multiple toy/cheat mode.

  1. #21
    TheDirtyDigger Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FFN View Post
    Don't bother man. Some people in this forum believe Hasbro bears them personal ill will.
    Me for one.
    A. Archer still hasn't forgiven me for that terrible joke that went wrong at our high school prom.
    How were we to know he'd go crazy after we drenched his gf in pig's blood?


    I'm sorry Aaron!!! God...how many times do you want me to say it???
    Last edited by TheDirtyDigger; 8th November 2008 at 08:53 PM. Reason: removed the blood! :)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffin View Post
    Hasbro do need to get some credit here, as the movie toys don't have the 18 month design period of normal TFs toys. They have to be rushed out in about half that time, and even still, some elements that are added to the animations in the movie, aren't in the toys (like Prime's sword). To have to rush out a huge number of toys, with exceptional sculpting and auto-morph features, bonus gimmicks like combining, just have to be sacrificed due to lack of time. It's not because of laziness.
    Fair enough - I wouldn't call it laziness. I would call it trying to do so much in that short timeframe.

    Personally, I'd rather see half the junk stripped out of the movie line this time around (Slammers, 2/3 size classes of the leader characters, peripheral stuff like the walkietalkies) so that the designers are able to focus on the core toys. Considering how badly some of this stuff sold last time around (the Slammers only moved when everything else was gone in the leadup to Christmas, the Prime & Megs voyagers took a long time to sell), I'd rather see fewer toys given more designer time each.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  3. #23
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    *nods* focus on quality rather than quantity

  4. #24
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    I would actually be more understanding of Hasbro's predicament here if they did not use the same 'lacking' approach on their other most recent non movie lines which have the same production cycle as any other.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griffin
    Everything in the Movie news section is a spoiler if the movie is not yet out, so it is redundant having 'spoilers' on every post. We just have the rule of not having spoilers in topic titles, because they show up on the main table and topic listings. Everything else is hidden in the post itself.
    No plot details are to be posted in non-spoiler topics until after each movie is released.
    My understanding of this rule was that plot spoilers couldn't be posted in threads that weren't marked as containing spoilers. Has that only been my interpretation? If not, could that rule be re-worded better to make it clear that even topics not marked with a spoiler warning can still contain spoilers? *shrug*

  6. #26
    Join Date
    24th May 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    38,239

    Default

    I will re-word it. This section was set up before the first movie came out so a lot of the parameters was guess-work. Now that it has passed, I can make some refinements to fix up the flaws.

  7. #27
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    Personally, I'd rather see half the junk stripped out of the movie line this time around (Slammers, 2/3 size classes of the leader characters, peripheral stuff like the walkietalkies) so that the designers are able to focus on the core toys. Considering how badly some of this stuff sold last time around (the Slammers only moved when everything else was gone in the leadup to Christmas, the Prime & Megs voyagers took a long time to sell), I'd rather see fewer toys given more designer time each.
    Oh heck yes.

    No more robot replicas, or that TECH stuff (which is still peg warming at my local bigw). And no more "ultimate", unless it really is ultimate, as in robosapien style ultimate.

    But I expect to see shelves full of mighty muggs, slammers and bumpers. Sigh.
    Code:
    O o 
      _
     / --------------------------------
    |      IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!!
     \_--------------------------------

  8. #28
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MV75
    And no more "ultimate", unless it really is ultimate, as in robosapien style ultimate.
    ...or if they're gonna give us a Universe Fortress Maximus! (can I have an A-men?)

  9. #29
    Join Date
    5th May 2008
    Location
    Clifton Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    ...or if they're gonna give us a Universe Fortress Maximus! (can I have an A-men?)
    A-MEN Brotha!
    |Buy ALL my things!|Collection Thread|Current Collection Count: ~661|
    |Wants|Galaxy Force Blue Rumble|

  10. #30
    Pulse is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    18th Jan 2008
    Location
    at one with the matrix...
    Posts
    3,725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    ...or if they're gonna give us a Universe Fortress Maximus! (can I have an A-men?)
    You mean one of these badboys...

    Hallelujah!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •