That's not really a fair comment. I'm the only one on the staff currently posting the first sightings postings, which often means a group posting of items from a week or two beforehand. This means scrolling through EVERY sightings posting, and I know (and have acknowledged it a few times in the past) that I sometimes miss something... which is why I recommend posting a photo if it is something new so that I can better see it and can post it as proof to others (here and overseas who follow our first sightings topic).
I'm sorry I missed yours, but it has now been added into the first sightings topic now.
Since the beginning of this year, sightings posts that have been quoted in the first sightings topic have been from...
9 - NSW
9 - ACT
8 - QLD (now 7, as I swapped out one for your sighting)
4 - VIC (now 5, from your sighting)
4 - WA (includes one of your sightings, so there is nothing deliberate in missing your sightings)
0 - SA
0 - TAS
Victoria may not be at the top of the list, but it isn't being totally ignored either... and "southern states" take out the top two spots. Not to mention, QLD would probably be equal or less than Victoria if you took out my sightings of the more obscure items that I have to keep track of here that most others don't even collect to notice.