Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Frenzy Rumble's Video Review and Photo Album for Supreme Devastator

  1. 4th July 2009, 02:04 PM #11
    STL's Avatar
    STL
    STL is offline Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,150

    Default

    I'm not convinced but I'll bite. I suspect they'll be like Ult BBs. We should be able to get them for about $100.
    Collection Count (w/ a 12.42% upsize): 3053
    New Family Members: DA-15 Jetwing Prime, DOTM Leader Ironhide, Perfect Effect Reflector, DOTM Shockwave & Skyhammer, eHobby United 3-packs
    Current Desires: Japanese BW Optimal Optimus
    The Holy Grail: Ultmetal Optimus Prime


    Visit the Wonderful World of: The Iacon City Hub-Capital Collection
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 4th July 2009, 02:19 PM #12
    blackoptimus
    blackoptimus is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    6th Jun 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    935

    Default

    Why is demolisher renamed to scavenger, also in the movie, devastator was climbing the pyramid but you see bumblebee fighting rampage, how is that possible isn't he meant to be a part of devastator, same goes for mixmaster and long haul.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 4th July 2009, 04:36 PM #13
    MV75's Avatar
    MV75
    MV75 is offline Rank 6 - Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    2,879

    Default

    Because they were non-robotic vehicles that were "gathered" for formation.

    Anyways, yes, I see very little play value in those toys, and little to no details on the vehicles to make up for their very simple and base conversions.

    And could you imagine a kid trying to pull those toys apart? Looked like the adult was having to put in some force.

    Quote Originally Posted by shokwave2 View Post
    Still looks too cheap and out-of-proportion to me. I hope Hasbro plan to make combining constructicons in the future. Even it meant no robot mode, but a massive and detailed Devastator at the end.
    *cough*

    I think that's what this toy is. Instead it came out detail-less.
    Code:
    O o 
  _
 / --------------------------------
|      IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!!
 \_--------------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 4th July 2009, 06:22 PM #14
    GoktimusPrime's Avatar
    GoktimusPrime
    GoktimusPrime is offline Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    I'd like to see Hasbro give us the Animated Constructicons - they don't need to combine since they never did in the show. I just wants them is all.

    Stuff for sale
    Transformers collection: 2955
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 4th July 2009, 09:03 PM #15
    Doubledealer's Avatar
    Doubledealer
    Doubledealer is offline Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
    Join Date
    14th Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,783

    Default

    Wouldn't mind it if it cost $100 or less. One of my main concerns is where I'd put the blardy thing - It's huge!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 4th July 2009, 09:55 PM #16
    TF76's Avatar
    TF76
    TF76 is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    9th Jan 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    497

    Default

    I like it, I think it will be a good toy, I hope it is under $150, but even worst case if it is $200, it would be close to that on a 20% off sale.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 5th July 2009, 01:19 PM #17
    RageOnTheRoads's Avatar
    RageOnTheRoads
    RageOnTheRoads is offline Rank 3 - Basic Member
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    I'd like to see Hasbro give us the Animated Constructicons - they don't need to combine since they never did in the show. I just wants them is all.
    Amen to that!

    Mmmm, he is kind of warming to me. Don't mind him as much as I used too. Mixmaster's barrel is laughably oversized though. Still think EZ Devi is leagues above Hasbro's.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 5th July 2009, 02:53 PM #18
    Gutsman Heavy's Avatar
    Gutsman Heavy
    Gutsman Heavy is offline Rank 8 - Deluxe Member
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    I'll grab one for about $80-90 or not at all (I hope)
    G1 sales
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 5th July 2009, 03:50 PM #19
    blackoptimus
    blackoptimus is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    6th Jun 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    935

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MV75 View Post
    Because they were non-robotic vehicles that were "gathered" for formation.

    Anyways, yes, I see very little play value in those toys, and little to no details on the vehicles to make up for their very simple and base conversions.

    And could you imagine a kid trying to pull those toys apart? Looked like the adult was having to put in some force.



    *cough*

    I think that's what this toy is. Instead it came out detail-less.
    WTF, non robotic vehicles, that sucks also why do they have the same names then?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 5th July 2009, 06:16 PM #20
    jaydisc's Avatar
    jaydisc
    jaydisc is offline Rank 9 - Board Staff
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    8,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackoptimus View Post
    WTF, non robotic vehicles, that sucks also why do they have the same names then?
    I suspect due to trademark ease.
    Check out My Internet Transformers Garage Sale!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules