Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Michael Bay hates the Dinobots

  1. #21
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roller View Post
    They would have been too hard to intro

    plus they are pretty stupid

    I just hope the next movie has some Action and Turbo masters
    Given Michael Bay's level of humor we are more likely to get Breast Masters - Literal ones.

    Edit: Looks like Digger is in tune with the ways of Bay

  2. #22
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robzy View Post
    On a positive note - I'm glad he "hates" them... it means we can all relax knowing that it's not another group of beloved characters that he's going to totally screw up!
    Yeah, I wish he'd hate the Stunticons too. I live in fear that he'll butcher them for his third movie.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Dead End already exists in the movie continuity thanks to the Scout (or TF1 Movie Jolt if you accept the retcon). Having said that, not being able to use the Dead End name won't necessarily stop him from putting Stunticons in the movie - after all, only four of the seven movie Constructicons have their G1 counterparts' names (Mixmaster, Long Haul, Scrapper and Scavenger). I would be surprised if we had another Decepticon gestalt in the third movie though consider we already had Devastator in ROTF, and with the Constructicons being an army like the Targetmaster Seacons in Masterforce, I don't see the need for them to have another gestalt. An Autobot gestalt would be possible - but I personally hope they just go for something new. We've seen a gestalt (and a combiner!) in the movie - kay thanks Mr Bay, something new please.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    kay thanks Mr Bay, something new please.
    A tight plot would be nice.


    Eagerly waiting for Masterpiece Meister

  5. #25
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirge View Post
    A tight plot would be nice.
    That's beyond what Bay can provide.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    Dead End already exists in the movie continuity thanks to the Scout (or TF1 Movie Jolt if you accept the retcon). Having said that, not being able to use the Dead End name won't necessarily stop him from putting Stunticons in the movie - after all, only four of the seven movie Constructicons have their G1 counterparts' names (Mixmaster, Long Haul, Scrapper and Scavenger). I would be surprised if we had another Decepticon gestalt in the third movie though consider we already had Devastator in ROTF, and with the Constructicons being an army like the Targetmaster Seacons in Masterforce, I don't see the need for them to have another gestalt. An Autobot gestalt would be possible - but I personally hope they just go for something new. We've seen a gestalt (and a combiner!) in the movie - kay thanks Mr Bay, something new please.

    True, true. I don't tend to regard that scout as Dead End really though, as he has had so many names, Detour, Jolt etc and a rather generic tech spec. And as for the movie line comics... do they sync up at all with the movie continuity? Hell M Bay is so flippant with names, we have two Devastators who are apparently different characters, the Grindor/Blackout, Brawl/Devastator issue... anyways. But you're right, I don't think we'll see another gestalt in the third movie. Won't stop him from cocking them up as individual cannon fodder though, e.g. Bonecrusher, Brawl. eww

  7. #27
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Chadstone, Vic
    Posts
    15,840

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    consider we already had Devastator in ROTF, and with the Constructicons being an army like the Targetmaster Seacons in Masterforce
    I've never looked at them that way before. Swarming drones that I don't have to feel bad watching the heroic Autobots slaughter them. I like that very much as an explanation.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulbot View Post
    I've never looked at them that way before. Swarming drones that I don't have to feel bad watching the heroic Autobots slaughter them. I like that very much as an explanation.
    I thought the heroic US military were the ones that slaughtered them with the Autobots doing this fancy little dance as they shot at the camera.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    2nd Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    I thought the heroic US military were the ones that slaughtered them with the Autobots doing this fancy little dance as they shot at the camera.
    To be fair, Ratched fired and reloaded his weapon...... once. And I remember seeing Ironhide running form the downpour of heroic US missiles, Sideswipe and Arcees, again running. Now that I think of it, did any bot besides Bee and Prime, take down a con at the end? I don't remember much of the battle.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    5th Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Get some else besides bay , there solved

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •