View Poll Results: Is it worth buying?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    31 83.78%
  • Only if cheap

    4 10.81%
  • No

    0 0%
  • Doesn't interest me

    2 5.41%
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Toy Review - Generations Thrust

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    12th Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    3,863

    Default

    I'm a fan of Thrust too, but....

    ...I also have a Robots in Disguise Ramjet (which basically has most of the same mold as Generations Thrust, apart from the stabilizer packs and wing position) and when comparing the quality of the plastics, Thrust seems to have a more subtle, not-so 'strong' plastic feel to him.

    I don't know if anyone else notices this too but my Thrust doesn't fit together as tightly as Ramjet, one example is where the Rear-nose of the plane pegs into the body in Alt. mode (seen looking down on the alt. mode) - both toys have the exact same transformation and parts at this region yet Thrust just feels somewhat weaker. Maybe it's because of the colour tat Thrust is, being a nice, glossy like maroon?

    What are your thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    5th Feb 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyWarp91 View Post
    I'm a fan of Thrust too, but....

    ...I also have a Robots in Disguise Ramjet (which basically has most of the same mold as Generations Thrust, apart from the stabilizer packs and wing position) and when comparing the quality of the plastics, Thrust seems to have a more subtle, not-so 'strong' plastic feel to him.

    I don't know if anyone else notices this too but my Thrust doesn't fit together as tightly as Ramjet, one example is where the Rear-nose of the plane pegs into the body in Alt. mode (seen looking down on the alt. mode) - both toys have the exact same transformation and parts at this region yet Thrust just feels somewhat weaker. Maybe it's because of the colour tat Thrust is, being a nice, glossy like maroon?

    What are your thoughts?
    I'm guessing by Robots in Disguise Ramjet you mean Classics Ramjet? (Same mold different wings?)

    If that's the case I've got them both sitting here in front me me, and I have to disagree I'm afraid. My Ramjet (purchased in mid 2007) had really loose legs out of the box and the plastic feels a few notches more brittle and coarse than the norm for Hasbro. Thrust I've not got a complaint about really.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    12th Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    3,863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SharkyMcShark View Post
    I'm guessing by Robots in Disguise Ramjet you mean Classics Ramjet? (Same mold different wings?)

    If that's the case I've got them both sitting here in front me me, and I have to disagree I'm afraid. My Ramjet (purchased in mid 2007) had really loose legs out of the box and the plastic feels a few notches more brittle and coarse than the norm for Hasbro. Thrust I've not got a complaint about really.
    No need to be afraid about disagreeing. Maybe our toys are different (like maybe something happened at the factory) because my Ramjet has quite tight legs and feels tougher than my Thrust lol. I did just buy my Ramjet about a month ago from eBay MISB. Nonetheless, Thrust is a great toy that makes my seeker collection almost complete. Now I'm after that cracking in the thunder above

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th Aug 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyWarp91 View Post
    I'm a fan of Thrust too, but....

    ...I also have a Robots in Disguise Ramjet (which basically has most of the same mold as Generations Thrust, apart from the stabilizer packs and wing position) and when comparing the quality of the plastics, Thrust seems to have a more subtle, not-so 'strong' plastic feel to him.

    I don't know if anyone else notices this too but my Thrust doesn't fit together as tightly as Ramjet, one example is where the Rear-nose of the plane pegs into the body in Alt. mode (seen looking down on the alt. mode) - both toys have the exact same transformation and parts at this region yet Thrust just feels somewhat weaker. Maybe it's because of the colour tat Thrust is, being a nice, glossy like maroon?

    What are your thoughts?
    Yes, I did notice. I also compared thrust to my ramjet and something about thrust feels more, Im not sure what word to use, brittle? (In comparison)

    Also, I had had to shave down a few parts of the figure (Gunpla people call them nubs) because of excess flak/shavings. It just really bothered me but I think most people won't care.

    Could just be mine though but they were really noticable because of the colour scheme. I still like the figure, but wish it had a better finish.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    12th Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    3,863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King Atlas View Post
    Yes, I did notice. I also compared thrust to my ramjet and something about thrust feels more, Im not sure what word to use, brittle? (In comparison)

    Also, I had had to shave down a few parts of the figure (Gunpla people call them nubs) because of excess flak/shavings. It just really bothered me but I think most people won't care.

    Could just be mine though but they were really noticable because of the colour scheme. I still like the figure, but wish it had a better finish.
    Yeah, brittle is the term I looking for. I was thinking maybe the quality of the plastic is contributed by its colour. What I mean is that maybe Thrust feels more brittle because his maroon-plastic is weaker than the white-plastic on Ramjet. Something to do with plastics and chemistry? It's been so long since I did chemistry back at High School lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •