Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Encore Devastator to have new head - not Gen2 yellow

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    They used to hire a fan. His name was Ichikawa Hirofumi. I don't think he decided on which toys were reissued -- because that depends on certain factors like:

    a) What fans wanted. Remember the old reissues had those self-addressed survey cards that let you nominate up to three suggestions per card of which toys you wanted reissued? Because I know most of the toys that my friends and I asked for did get reissued.

    b) What moulds were still available. A lot of fans would've asked for Mirage, but that mould is lost/destroyed so it's not possible.

    c) What moulds are viable. e.g. Takara's always had the moulds for the Constructicons but never wanted to reissue them until the Encore reissue because there were so many KOs of Devastator out there they feared that a more expensive legit reissue couldn't compete.

    What Ichikawa Hirofumi did have a direct input into was what colours to release for the eHobby exclusives. In fact, he wrote up all their tech spec profiles and names! It was his decision to make them based on their original Diaclone and Microman colours, or based on some obscure characters that only fans would appreciate (e.g. Hauler, Sunstorm etc.). He also wrote the entire Story of Binaltech and all their profiles, plus a LOT of other stuff for Takara. It not only gave fans what they wanted, but also helped heal Takara-fan relations after the way Takara shafted Ichikawa (and fans in general) at BotCon Japan 2000.

    As for chrome Bluestreak and gold chrome Jazz... yeah, they're weird. But they were lucky draw prizes given away as freebies. I don't expect much quality from freebies.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    They used to hire a fan. His name was Ichikawa Hirofumi. I don't think he decided on which toys were reissued -- because that depends on certain factors like:

    a) What fans wanted. Remember the old reissues had those self-addressed survey cards that let you nominate up to three suggestions per card of which toys you wanted reissued? Because I know most of the toys that my friends and I asked for did get reissued.

    b) What moulds were still available. A lot of fans would've asked for Mirage, but that mould is lost/destroyed so it's not possible.

    c) What moulds are viable. e.g. Takara's always had the moulds for the Constructicons but never wanted to reissue them until the Encore reissue because there were so many KOs of Devastator out there they feared that a more expensive legit reissue couldn't compete.

    What Ichikawa Hirofumi did have a direct input into was what colours to release for the eHobby exclusives. In fact, he wrote up all their tech spec profiles and names! It was his decision to make them based on their original Diaclone and Microman colours, or based on some obscure characters that only fans would appreciate (e.g. Hauler, Sunstorm etc.). He also wrote the entire Story of Binaltech and all their profiles, plus a LOT of other stuff for Takara. It not only gave fans what they wanted, but also helped heal Takara-fan relations after the way Takara shafted Ichikawa (and fans in general) at BotCon Japan 2000.

    As for chrome Bluestreak and gold chrome Jazz... yeah, they're weird. But they were lucky draw prizes given away as freebies. I don't expect much quality from freebies.
    Is that guy stiill around after the Tomy merger? The examples you are referring to are pretty old now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    Is that guy stiill around after the Tomy merger? The examples you are referring to are pretty old now.
    Yeah, but in a far more limited capacity compared to before the merger.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    The more I look at this Devastator, the more disappointed I feel that it's not the yellow version. I frankly don't see the point of this release.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    7th Mar 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    6,605

    Default

    I agree. It does seem a bit pointless.
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain

  6. #6
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Not that I buy TF's very often these days but I would be inclined to get this set having never owned any G1 Constructicons, only the early 90's yellow, non-Devastator versions. The little bit of G1 cartoon accuracy (incredibly retroactive as it is) probably seals the deal for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Metallikato View Post
    Not that I buy TF's very often these days but I would be inclined to get this set having never owned any G1 Constructicons, only the early 90's yellow, non-Devastator versions. The little bit of G1 cartoon accuracy (incredibly retroactive as it is) probably seals the deal for me.
    I can understand the appeal of the toy if you don't already own a G1 Devastator and are a fan of the cartoon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •