Maybe this is just my personal opinion, but I think it should be neither; I think wikis should just be neutral in tone and deliver facts without bias. Sure, people are entitled to voice opinions, but I don't think wikis are the time/place for it. I've never seen a wiki more loaded with blatant bias overtones than TFwiki. I've also never seen a wiki loaded with more spelling and grammatical errors than Tardis wikia. Lemme put it this way, I find Wikipedia has better standards than TFwiki... and it's not as if Wikipedia has terribly high standards!
^Justmyopinion.
Perhaps that reflection of difference in the command of the English language between the common Wiki-man and TFwiki contributors/TF-fans sugguests summfing..
Perhaps that reflection of difference in the command of the English language between the common Wiki-man and TFwiki contributors/TF-fans sugguests summfing..
Oh, my beef with TFwiki isn't over their use of English, that comment was directed at Tardis wikia (the Doctor Who wiki) which is absolutely littered with errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation etc. The use of language in TFwiki is mostly fine.